Methods Inf Med 2002; 41(02): 134-140
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634297
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Systems Analysis in Health Care: Framework and Example

E. Ammenwerth
1   Department of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Germany
,
F. Ehlers
1   Department of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Germany
,
R. Eichstädter
2   Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Germany
,
R. Haux
1   Department of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Germany
,
U. Pohl
3   Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Germany
,
F. Resch
2   Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 22 February 2001

Accepted 05 November 2001

Publication Date:
07 February 2018 (online)

Summary

Objectives: Due to the high complexity of structures and processes in health care, thorough systems analyses in health care run the risk of becoming very complex and difficult to handle. Therefore, we aimed to support systematic systems analysis in health care by developing a comprehensive framework that presents and describes potential areas of analysis.

Methods: A framework for systems analysis in health care was developed and applied in a health care setting. To provide a clear structure, the framework describes the potential views and levels of systems analyses in a health care environment.

Results: The framework comprises five views (roles and responsibilities, information processing and tools, communication, business processes, teams structure and cooperation) and five levels of analysis (overall organization, organizational unit, staff member, role, task). The framework was successfully applied in an analysis of the structures and processes of the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry of the University Medical Center Heidelberg.

Conclusions: The proposed comprehensive framework aims to structure the views and levels of systems analysis in the complex health care environment. Our first experiences support the usefulness of such a framework.

 
  • References

  • 1 Haux R, Knaup P, Bauer A, Herzog W, Reinhardt E, Überla K. et al. Information Processing in Healthcare at the Start of the third Millennium: Potential and Limitations. Methods Inf Med 2001; 40: 156-62.
  • 2 WHO.. Design and implementation of health information systems. ISBN 9241561998, Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000
  • 3 Vassilacopoulos G, Paraskevopoulou E. A Process Model Basis for Evolving Hospital Information Systems. J Med Sys 1997; 21 (Suppl. 03) 141-53.
  • 4 Fessler J, Grémy F. Ethical problems in health information systems. Methods Inf Med 2001; 40: 359-61.
  • 5 Lorenzi N, Riley R. eds. Organizational Aspects of Health Informatics – Managing Technological Change. Computers in Health Care. New York: Springer; 1995
  • 6 Winter A, Ammenwerth E, Bott O, Brigl B, Buchauer A, Gräber S. et al. Strategic Information Management Plan: The Basis for systematic Information Management in Hospitals. Int J Med Inf 2001; 64 2-3 99-109.
  • 7 Krallmann H, Frank H, Gronau G. Systemanalyse im Unternehmen. München, Wien: Olden-bourg; 1999
  • 8 Friedman C, Wyatt JC. Evaluation Methods in Medical Informatics. New York: Springer; 1997
  • 9 Heeks R, Mundy D, Salazar A. Why Health Care Information Systems Succeed or Fail. Report No. 9, Working Paper Series “Information Systems for Public Sector Management”, Institute for Development Policy and Management University of Manchester; Manchester: 1999
  • 10 Beynon-Davies P, Lloyd-Williams M. When health information systems fail. Top Health Inf Manage 1999; 20 (Suppl. 01) 66-79.
  • 11 Sicotte C, Denis J, Lehoux P. The Computer Based Patient Record:A Strategic Issue in Process Innovation. J Med Syst 1998; 22 (Suppl. 06) 431-43.
  • 12 Scheer A. ARIS. In: Handbook on Architectures of Information Systems. Bernus P, Mer-tins K, Schmidt G. eds. Berlin: Springer; 1998: 541-66.
  • 13 Zachman J. A framework for information systems architecture. IBM systems journal 1999; 38 2&3 454-470 (Reprint). More Information at http://www.zifa.com.
  • 14 Pons.. Pons Collins Dictionary of the English Language. Glasgow: HarperCollins; 1998
  • 15 Timpka T, Nyce JM. Dilemmas at a primary health care center: a baseline study for computer-supported cooperative health care work. Methods Inf Med 1992; 31 (Suppl. 03) 204-9.
  • 16 Bricon-Souf N, Beuscart R, Renard JM, Geib JM. An asynchronous co-operative model for co-ordinating medical unit activities. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1997; 54 1-2 77-83.
  • 17 Dunckel H, Volpert W, Zölch M, Kreutner U, Pleiss C, Hennes K. Kontrastive Aufgabenanalyse im Büro – Der KABA-Leitfaden. Zürich: vdf; 1993
  • 18 Rumbaugh J, Jacobson I, Booch G. The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1999
  • 19 Winter A, Haux R. A Three-Level Graph-Based Model for the Management of Hospital Information Systems. Methods Inf Med 1995; 34: 378-96.
  • 20 Schäl T. Workflow Management Systems for Process Organisations. Berlin: Springer; 1996
  • 21 Ammenwerth E, Ehlers F, Eichstädter R, Haux R, Kruppa B, Parzer P. et al. Unterstützung der Organisation des Behandlungsprozesses – Vorgehensplan. Report No. 1/2000, Dept. of Medical Informatics University Medical Center Heidelberg; 2000
  • 22 Ehlers F, Ammenwerth E, Eichstädter R, Haux R, Kruppa B, Parzer P. et al. Unterstützung der Organisation des Behandlungsprozesses in der Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie – Ist- und Schwachstellenanalyse – Studienprotokoll. Ergebnisse und Empfehlungen, Report No. 5/2001, Dept. of Medical Informatics University Medical Center Heidelberg; 2001. http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/1780.