Comparison of Computer-based Information Support to Clinical Research in Chinese and Japanese Hospitals

Summary

Objectives: The objectives of this research are to examine the current situation of computer-based information support of clinical research in hospitals and to determine the expectations of clinicians toward clinical research support functions of hospital information systems (HISs) in both China and Japan.

Methods: 172 clinicians from 42 major hospitals in China (2 groups), and 568 clinicians from 79 university hospitals in Japan (2 groups), were surveyed by postal questionnaire during July and August, 1999. The Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to analyze the differences among the groups.

Results: The total response rate was 66.9%. The result shows that 94.8% of the Japanese clinicians, 3.5 times more than those in China, use computers almost every day. High significance was shown for the frequency of non-HIS based information resources used by clinicians between China and Japan (p <0.001), whereas no significance for the frequency of HIS use by clinicians between the China I and Japan I groups (p = 0.725) was found. 33.3% clinicians in China thought they could obtain 30-50% of the necessary patient data for clinical research from the HIS, about 2 times more than in Japan (p = 0.009).

Conclusions: Although the degree of computer involvement among clinicians in Japan is much higher than in China, the computer-based hospital information systems have not been developed well for supporting clinical research in both countries. The clinicians expect comprehensive computerized patient records (CPRs) and full use of patient related information in the existing HISs to support their clinical research.

Keywords

Hospital information systems - information storage and retrieval - clinical medicine - research - questionnaires

• References

• 1 Hubbs PR, Rindfleisch TC, Godin P. et al. Medical information on the Internet. JAMA 1998; 280: 1363 (editorials).
• 2 Hersh WR, Hickam DH. How well do physicians use electronic information retrieval systems? A framework for investigation and systematic review. JAMA 1998; 280: 1347-52.
• 3 Lindberg DAB, Humphreys BL. The promise: a time of change for medical informatics in USA. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 1999. IMIA. Stuttgart-New York; Schattauer: 1999: 53-7.
• 4 Satya-Murti S. Hospital information systems: The physician-computer connection: a practical guide to physician involvement in hospital information system. JAMA 1993; 270 (Suppl. 07) 885-6.
• 5 Dorda W, Wrba Th, Duftschmid G. et al. ArchiMed: A medical information and retrieval system. Methods Inf Med 1999; 38: 16-24.
• 6 Sata H, Hori M. Medical information system in near future: requests from physicians. The proceedings of the 18th joint conference on medical informatics in Japan. 1998: 15. (In Japanese).
• 7 Sakon M, Monden M. Problems in hospital information system and its future: the viewpoints from surgeons. The proceedings of the 18th joint conference on medical informatics in Japan. 1998: 18. (In Japanese).
• 8 Kaihara S. The promise of medical informatics in Asia. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 1999. IMIA. Stuttgart-New York: Schattauer; 1999: 61-4.
• 9 Kaihara S. Realisation of the computerised patient record: relevance and unsolved problems. Med Inf 1998; 49: 1-8.
• 10 Yang MJ, Cao L, Lin F. et al. Rational thoughts on the development of medical informatics in China for new century. Proceedings of the first China-Japan-Korea joint symposium on medical informatics. Academy press; 1999. Beijing:
• 11 Haruki Y, Ogushi Y, Okada Y. et al. Status and perspective of hospital information system in Japan. Methods Inf Med 1999; 38: 200-6.
• 12 Ball MJ, Peterson H, Douglas JV. The computerized patient record: A global view. MD Computing 1999: 40-6.
• 13 Wang JZ. Recent trends and challenges of HIS in China: The growth potential using M and Cache. Proceedings of the first China-Japan-Korea joint symposium on medical informatics Academy press; 1999. Beijing.:
• 14 de Groen PC, Barry JA, Schaller WJ. Applying World Wide Web technology to the study of patients with rare diseases. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129: 107-13.
• 15 Smith R. What clinical information do doctors need?. BMJ 1996; 313 7074 1062-8.
• 16 Covell DG, Uman GC, Manning PR. Information needs in office practice: are they being met?. Ann Intern Med 1985; 103: 596-9.
• 17 Williamson JW, German PS, Weiss R. et al. Health science information management and continuing education of physicians. A survey of US primary care practitioners and their opinion leaders. Ann Intern Med 1989; 110: 151-60.
• 18 Mckinley RK, Manku-Scott T, Hastings AM. et al. Reliability and validity of a new measure of patient satisfaction with out of hours primary medical care in the united kingdom: development of a patient questionnaire. BMJ 1997; 314: 193.
• 19 Friedman CP, Wyatt JC. Evaluation methods in medical informatics. Springer-Verlag Press; 2000