Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2003; 42(05): 509-518
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634377
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Quality of Health Care: Informatics Foundations[*]

A. Hasman
1   Department of Medical Informatics, University Maastricht, The Netherlands
,
C. Safran
2   Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA and Clinician Support Technology, Framingham, MA, USA
,
H. Takeda
3   Department of Medical Information Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2, Yamada-oka, Suita, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objective: To discuss in what ways computer systems can contribute to the quality of healthcare and on which principles of informatics successful systems are based.

Methods: Part of the information was obtained via a literature search and part is based on the knowledge of the authors.

Results: The results of the literature search are reported. The answers to the questions whether decision support is useful and which factors determine its success, the foundations of computerized guidelines systems and applications of physician order entry and medical risk management are presented. Conclusions: Despite many publications concerning diagnostic support systems their use in clinical practice is limited. Reminder systems do appear to have an impact on health outcomes. Standards for guideline models are being developed for effective sharing of guidelines across systems. Electronic patient records and physician order entry systems are useful aids in medical risk management.

Keywords

Literature review - decision support - risk management - computerized guideline systems - guideline models - physician order entry systems - decision support methods

* Updated version of an invited review paper that appeared in Haux, R., Kulikowski, E. (eds.) (2003). IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2003: Quality of Health Care: The Role of Informatics, pp. 143-152, Stuttgart: Schattauer


 

  • References

  • 1 Miller RA, Pople HE, Myers JD. INTERNIST-1, an experimental computer-based diagnostic consultant for general internal medicine. N Engl J Med 1982; 307: 468-76.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Berman L, Miller RA. Problem area formation as an element of computer aided diagnosis: a comparison of two strategies within Quick Medical Reference (QMR). Methods Inf Med 1991; 30: 90-5.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lau LM, Warner HR. Performance of a diagnostic system (Iliad) as a tool for quality assurance. Comput Biomed Res 1992; 25: 314-23.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Feldman MJ, Barnett GO. An approach to evaluating the accuracy of Dxplain. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1991; 35: 261-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Blois MS. Information and medicine. The nature of medical descriptions. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1984
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. (eds). To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health Care System. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Staender S, Davies J, Helmreich B, Sexton B, Kaufmann BM. The anaesthesia critical incident reporting system: an experience based database. Int J Med Inf 1997; 47: 87-90.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Fox J, Das S. Safe and sound: artificial intelligence in hazardous applications. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press/ The MIT Press; 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Kobus DA, Amundson D, Moses JD, Rascona D, Gubler KD. A computerized medical incident reporting system for errors in the intensive care unit: initial evaluation of interrater agreement. Mil Med 2001; 166: 350-3.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Stanhope N, Crowley-Murphy M, Vincent C, O’Connor AM, Taylor-Adams SE. An evaluation of adverse incident reporting. J Eval Clin Pract 1999; 5: 1-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Deming W. Out of the Crisis. Boston: MIT Press; 1982
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Blumenthal D, Scheck AC. Improving Clinical Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Berner ES, Webster GD, Shugerman AA. et al. Performance of four computer-based diagnostic systems. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 1792-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Elstein AE, Friedman CP, Wolf FM. et al. Effects of a decision support system on the diagnostic accuracy of users: a preliminary report. JAMIA 1996; 3: 422-8.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Friedman CP, Elstein AE, Wolf FM. et al. Enhancement of clinician’s diagnostic reasoning by computer based consultation. A multi-site study of 2 systems. JAMA 1999; 282: 1851-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Balas EA, Austin SM, Mitchell JA, Ewigman BG, Bopp KD, Brown GD. The clinical value of computerized information services. A review of 98 randomized clinical trials. Arch Fam Med 1996; 5: 271-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Shea S, Dumouchel W, Bahamonde L. A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting. JAMIA 1996; 3 (Suppl. 06) 399-409.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Austin SM, Balas EA, Mitchel JA, Ewigman BG. Effect of physician reminders on preventive care: meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. JAMIA 1994; 1 suppl 121-4.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Johnston ME, Langton KB, Haynes RB, Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinical performance and patient outcome. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120: 135-42.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes. JAMA 1998; 280: 1339-46.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Balas EA, Weingarten S, Garb CT, Blumenthal D, Boren SA, Brown GD. Improving preventive care by prompting physicians. Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160: 301-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, Haynes RB. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. Can Med Assoc J 1995; 153 (Suppl. 10) 1423-31.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Field MJ, Lohr KN. (eds). Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1990
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Grimshaw JM, Russel IT. Effects of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluation. Lancet 1993; 342: 1317-22.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Field MJ, Lohr KN. (eds). Guidelines for clinical practice guidelines: from development to use. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Payne TH. Computer decision support systems. Chest 2000; 118: 47S-52S.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Teich JM, Wrinn MM. Clinical decision support systems come of age. MD computing 2000; 17 (Suppl. 01) 43-6.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Reggia JA, Tuhrim S. Computer-assisted medical decision making. Volumes 1 and 2. New York: Springer Verlag; 1985
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Miller PL. Selected topics in medical artificial intelligence. New York: Springer Verlag; 1988
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Wang D, Peleg M, Tu SW. et al. Representation primitives, process models and patient data in computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines: a literature review of guideline representation models. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2002; 68: 59-70.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Hripcsak G, Ludemann P, Pryor TA, Wigertz OB, Clayon PD. Rationale for the Arden Syntax. Comput Biomed Res 1994; 27 (Suppl. 04) 291-324.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Ohno-Machado L, Gennari JH, Murphy S, Jain NL, Tu SW. et al. The Guideline Interchange Format: A model for representing guidelines. JAMIA 1998; 5 (Suppl. 04) 357-72.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Peleg M, Boxwala A, Ogunyemi O, Zeng Q, Tu SW. et al. GLIF3: the evolution of a guideline representation format. In: Proc AMIA Annual Symposium. 2000: 645-9.
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Fox J, Johns N, Lyons C, Rahmanzadeh A. et al. PROforma: a general technology for clinical decision support systems. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1997; 54 1-2 59-67.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Shahar Y, Miksch S, Johnson P. The Asgaard project: a task specific framework for the application and critiquing of time-oriented clinical guidelines. Artif Intell Med 1998; 14 1-2 29-51.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Musen MA, Tu SW, Das AK, Shahar Y. EON: a component based approach to automation of protocol-directed therapy. JAMIA 1996; 3 (Suppl. 06) 367-88.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Grosso WE, Eriksson H, Fergerson RW, Gennari JH, Tu SW, Musen MA. Knowledge Modeling at the Millennium (The Design and Evolution of Protégé-2000). Twelfth Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management (KAW ’99); 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 38 De Clercq PA, Hasman A, Blom JA, Korsten HHM. Design and implementation of a framework to support the development of clinical guidelines. Int J Med Inf 2001; 64 2-3 285-318.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 McDonald CJ, Overhage JM, Tierney WM. et al. The Regenstrief Medical Record System: a quarter century experience. Int J Med Inf 1999; 54 (Suppl. 03) 225-53.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ. et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA 1998; 280 (Suppl. 15) 1311-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Lee F, Teich JM, Spurr CD, Bates DW. Implementation of physician order entry: user satisfaction and self-reported usage patterns. JAMIA 1996; 3 (Suppl. 01) 42-55.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Overhage JM, Perkins S, Tierney WM, McDonald CJ. Control trial of direct physician order entry. JAMIA 2001; 8: 361-71.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Matsumura Y, Takeda H, Inoue M. Implementation of the totally integrated hospital information system (HUMANE) in Osaka university hospital,. In: Greenes RA, Peterson AH, Prottie DJ. (eds) Medinfo ’95; North-Holland, Amsterdam;: 1995: 590-3.
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Sittig DF, Stead WW. Computer-based physician order entry: the state of the art. JAMIA 1994; 1: 108-23.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Haruki Y, Ogushi Y, Okada Y, Kimura M, Kumamoto I, Sekita Y. Status and perspective of hospital information systems in Japan. Methods Inf Med 1999; 38: 200-6.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 43, Making Health Care Safer: A Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices, AHRQ Publication No. 01-E058.
    PubMed
  • 47 Nakajima K, Kuwata S, Matsumura SY, Oshima H, Takeda H. Operation and effects of computerized incident reporting system for prevention of medical adverse events. J Japanese Medical Informatics Assoc 2001; 21: 77-82.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Takeda H, Matsumura Y, Okada T, Kuwata S, Inoue M. A Japanese approach to establish an electronic patient record system in an intelligent hospital. Int J Med Inform 1998; 49: 45-51.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Matsumura Y, Takeda H, Okada T, Kuwata S, Hiroaki N, Hazumi N, Inoue M. Devices for structured data entry in electronic patient record. In: Cesnik B, McCray AT, Scerrer JR. (eds) IOS Press, Amsterdam, Medinfo ’98.; 1998: 85-8.
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Matsumura Y, Kuwata S, Kusuoka H, Takahashi Y, Onishi H, Kawamoto T, Takeda H. Dynamic Viewer of Medical Events in Electronic Medical Record. In: Patel VL, Rogers R, Haux R. (eds) IOS Press; Amsterdam: Medinfo 2001 2001: 648-52.
    Google Scholar
  • 51 Kondoh H, Takeda H, Matsumura Y, Kuwata S, Yoshimua H, Narumi Y, Nakamura H, Okura Y, Inamura K, Washiashi T, Okada S. PACS linked to EPR. In: Patel VL, Rogers R, Haux R. (eds) IOS Press, Amsterdam, Medinfo 2001; 2001: 915-8.
    Google Scholar
  • 52 Bates DW, Scott Evans R, Murff H. et al. Detecting adverse events using information technology. JAMIA 2003; 10: 115-28.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar