Endoscopy 2018; 50(04): S63-S64
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1637215
ESGE Days 2018 oral presentations
20.04.2018 – Best care session 2
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

CARBON DIOXIDE INSUFFLATION DURING ENDOSCOPIC RESECTION OF LARGE COLORECTAL POLYPS CAN REDUCE POST-PROCEDURE ABDOMINAL PAIN

JW Chung
1   Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, Divison of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon, Korea, Republic of
,
SY Kim
1   Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, Divison of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon, Korea, Republic of
,
JH Kim
1   Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, Divison of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon, Korea, Republic of
,
YJ Kim
1   Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, Divison of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon, Korea, Republic of
,
KO Kim
1   Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, Divison of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon, Korea, Republic of
,
KA Kwon
1   Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, Divison of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon, Korea, Republic of
,
DK Park
1   Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, Divison of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon, Korea, Republic of
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 March 2018 (online)

 

Aims:

Compared to air insufflation, carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation reduces abdominal pain after endoscopic procedures. However, studies of the use of CO2 insufflation during endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps (LCPs) are lacking. This study evaluated the impact of CO2 insufflation on pain after endoscopic resection of LCPs.

Methods:

In a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT), 132 patients were randomly assigned to groups that underwent endoscopic resection with CO2 insufflation (CO2 group, n = 66) or air insufflation (air group, n = 66). The primary outcome was abdominal pain post-procedure (PP), recorded using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes were abdominal distension, rates of technical success, amounts of sedatives prescribed, use of analgesics, and adverse events.

Results:

Baseline patient characteristics were similar between the groups. The mean VAS score for abdominal pain was 12.3 in the CO2 group vs. 17.5 in the air group at 1h PP (P= 0.047), 9.0 vs. 11.2 at 3h PP (P= 0.440), 4.2 vs. 6.9 at 6h PP (P= 0.307), and 1.6 vs. 3.1 at 24h PP (P= 0.294). At 1h PP, no pain was reported by 41.9% of patients in the CO2 group vs. 19.7% in the air group (P= 0.008). The secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusions:

The results of this RCT demonstrate the superiority of CO2 insufflation for endoscopic resection of LCPs in terms of decreasing PP abdominal pain.