Endoscopy 2018; 50(04): S95-S96
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1637312
ESGE Days 2018 oral presentations
21.04.2018 – Towards extreme endoscopy
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

PREDICTORS OF SUCCESS AND RESCUE OPTIONS OF EUS-GUIDED RENDEZVOUS (EUS-RV) FOR BILIARY ACCESS AFTER FAILED ERCP CANNULATION

M Cimavilla
1   Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
,
J García-Alonso
1   Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
,
R Torres
1   Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
,
A Carbajo
1   Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
,
M De Benito
1   Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
,
I Peñas
1   Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
,
S Sevilla
1   Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
,
N Mora
1   Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
,
P GIl-Simon
1   Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
,
C De la Serna
1   Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
,
M Pérez-Miranda
1   Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 March 2018 (online)

 

Aims:

Failed cannulation occurs in 3% of ERCPs. EUS-RV can overcome failure. We aimed to identify predictors of success and rescue options of EUS-RV.

Methods:

Review of prospective database on 6843 consecutive ERCPs between 2010 – 2017. Inclusion: patients with biliary obstruction and failed cannulation undergoing EUS-RV.

Results:

79 consecutive EUS-RV (57% male, median age 76.5, 69.5% benign). Procedural variables shown in Table-1. Primary technical success was 63.3% (3.5% failed biliary puncture, 65.5% failed guidewire placement, 31% failed cannulation). Variables associated with technical success in univariate analysis were flexible RV (antegrade passage of the guidewire through a catheter across papilla/stricture) versus rigid RV (through needle) (89.9% vs. 56.7% p = 0,01), transgastric versus transduodenal access (94.1 vs. 54.8%, p = 0.003), intrahepatic versus extrahepatic access (83,3 vs. 57,4%, p = 0,05), and benign stricture (25%, versus remainder indications 67.6%, p = 0,02). In multivariate analysis, transgastric access and indication other than benign stricture remained significant. In 75.9% (22/29) of failed EUS-RV, rescue biliary drainage was achieved during the same session (40% transmural-EUS, 32% methylene-blue cholangiography, and 12% re-ERCP), final technical success rate of 91%. 68 EUS-RV patients had one-month follow-up available; 6 complications occurred in 5 procedures (8.8%): bleeding 2, perforation 2, acute pancreatitis 1, biliary leakage 1; 3 of them were severe, requiring surgery (1 death).

Tab. 1

Access

- Transgastric, (21,5%)

- Transduodenal, (78,5%)

Target

- Intrahepatic-bile-duct, (22,8%)

- Extrahepatic-bile-duct, (77,2%)

Target dilation

- Present, (70,3%)

- Absent, (29,7%)

Cannulation

- Parallel, (46.2%)

- Over-the-wire, (53,8%)

RV rigid/flexible

- Rigid, (76,9%)

- Flexible, (23,1%)

Conclusions:

Primary success rates of EUS-RV remain low. Flexible catheters to direct antegrade passage of the guidewire could improve them. 75% of failed EUS-RV can be rescued in the same session either by transmural-EUS or reattempted ERCP following methylene-blue/contrast EUS-cholangiography, resulting in 91% final technical success rates.