CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology 2018; 01(01): 033-040
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1673317
Original Article
Indian Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology

Computed Tomography Enterography: Better Luminal Distension with a Shorter Ingestion Time Protocol in an Indian Population

Ambika R.
1   Department of Radiodiagnosis, Columbia Asia Referral Hospital, Yeshwanthpur, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
,
Vidhya Rani Reddy
1   Department of Radiodiagnosis, Columbia Asia Referral Hospital, Yeshwanthpur, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 09 August 2018

Accepted after revision: 18 August 2018

Publication Date:
18 June 2019 (online)

Abstract

Aim This article prospectively evaluates the adequacy of bowel distension in computed tomography enterography (CTE) with a 45-minute contrast ingestion time and compares it with the most widely used protocol in the literature of 1 hour 20 minutes.

Materials and Methods The CTE was performed in 42 consecutive patients divided into two groups—A and B. Group A patients were instructed to drink 2 L of polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution over 1 hour 20 minutes. Group B patients were instructed to do the same over 45 minutes. At the end of contrast ingestion, plain and contrast CT abdomen was performed and CTE images were reviewed. Manual quantitative analysis of degree of small bowel distension was performed in the following manner: on coronal images, the abdominal cavity was divided into four quadrants: right upper, left upper, right lower, and left lower quadrants. The maximum small bowel lumen diameter (inner-to-inner wall) was measured in five different loops within each of the four quadrants. If four or more measurements in a quadrant ≥ 1.8 cm (considered “adequate luminal distension”), a score of 1 was assigned to that quadrant. If less than 4 measurements in the quadrant > 1.8 cm, a score of 0 was assigned to that quadrant. The ensuing sum of scores from all four quadrants resulted in the distension grade for that CTE study (Grades 1–4).

Results There was a statistically significant difference in the degree of small bowel distension between the two groups with better distension seen in group B (p < 0.001).

Conclusion Indians have a rapid gut transit time compared with Western populations. Hence, CTE contrast ingestion time protocols optimized in Western populations may not be suitable in Indians. The shorter 45-minute ingestion protocol provided consistently better luminal distension in our population than the longer 1 hour 20-minute protocol described in the literature. To the best of our knowledge, there are no other studies comparing CTE ingestion time protocols in a given population.

 
  • References

  • 1 Gore R, Levine M. Barium examinations of small intestine. Textbook of Gastrointestinal Radiology. 3rd ed.. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2007: 735-897
  • 2 Wold PB, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Sandborn WJ. Assessment of small bowel Crohn disease: noninvasive peroral CT enterography compared with other imaging methods and endoscopy--feasibility study. Radiology 2003; 229 (01) 275-281
  • 3 Paulsen SR, Huprich JE, Fletcher JG. et al. CT enterography as a diagnostic tool in evaluating small bowel disorders: review of clinical experience with over 700 cases. Radiographics 2006; 26 (03) 641-657 discussion 657–662
  • 4 Ilangovan R, Burling D, George A, Gupta A, Marshall M, Taylor SA. CT enterography: review of technique and practical tips. Br J Radiol 2012; 85 1015 876-886
  • 5 Macari M, Balthazar EJ. CT of bowel wall thickening: significance and pitfalls of interpretation. Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176 (05) 1105-1116
  • 6 Upegui J Daniel, Mendoza B, Oscar D, Segura C, Wilber O, Heredia S, Fabian M, Galvis RGerman, Fuentes Jorge E. Use of CT enterography forsmall bowel pathology: experience and findings in 90 patients. Revisit colombiana de Radiologia 2010; 21 (01) 2818-2825
  • 7 Megibow AJ, Babb JS, Hecht EM. et al. Evaluation of bowel distention and bowel wall appearance by using neutral oral contrast agent for multi-detector row CT. Radiology 2006; 238 (01) 87-95
  • 8 Prakashini K, Kakkar C, Sambhaji C, Shetty CM, Rao VR. Quantitative and qualitative bowel analysis using mannitol, water and iodine-based endoluminal contrast agent on 64-row detector CT. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2013; 23 (04) 373-378
  • 9 Young BM, Fletcher JG, Booya F. et al. Head-to-head comparison of oral contrast agents for cross-sectional enterography: small bowel distention, timing, and side effects. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008; 32 (01) 32-38
  • 10 Ghoshal UC, Gupta D, Kumar A, Misra A. Colonic transit study by radio-opaque markers to investigate constipation: validation of a new protocol for a population with rapid gut transit. Natl Med J India 2007; 20 (05) 225-229
  • 11 Jayanthi V, Chacko A, Gani IK, Mathan VI. Intestinal transit in healthy southern Indian subjects and in patients with tropical sprue. Gut 1989; 30 (01) 35-38
  • 12 Sadik R, Abrahamsson H, Stotzer PO. Gender differences in gut transit shown with a newly developed radiological procedure. Scand J Gastroenterol 2003; 38 (01) 36-42
  • 13 Metcalf AM, Phillips SF, Zinsmeister AR, MacCarty RL, Beart RW, Wolff BG. Simplified assessment of segmental colonic transit. Gastroenterology 1987; 92 (01) 40-47
  • 14 Arhan P, Devroede G, Jehannin B. et al. Segmental colonic transit time. Dis Colon Rectum 1981; 24 (08) 625-629
  • 15 Pai CG, Kurian G. A modified radiographic method for estimating segmental colonic transit time in subjects with rapid gut transit. Indian J Med Res 1999; 110: 22-26
  • 16 Panigrahi MK, Kar SK, Singh SP, Ghoshal UC. Defecation frequency and stool form in a coastal eastern Indian population. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013; 19 (03) 374-380
  • 17 Thankappan KR, Narendranathan M. Normal bowel habits: results of a study in Kerala. Indian J Gastroenterol 1992; 11 (Suppl. 01) A3
  • 18 Solem CA, Loftus Jr EV, Fletcher JG. et al. Small-bowel imaging in Crohn's disease: a prospective, blinded, 4-way comparison trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68 (02) 255-266
  • 19 Minordi LM, Vecchioli A, Mirk P, Bonomo L. CT enterography with polyethylene glycol solution vs CT enteroclysis in small bowel disease. Br J Radiol 2011; 84 (998) 112-119
  • 20 Huprich JE, Fletcher JG, Filder JL, Liano E. Obscure GI bleeding: the role of multiphase CT enterography. Appl Radiol 2011; 40 (12) 16-20
  • 21 Sodhi JS, Zargar SA, Rashid W. et al. 64-section multiphase CT enterography as a diagnostic tool in the evaluation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Indian J Gastroenterol 2012; 31 (02) 61-68