The Journal of Hip Surgery 2019; 03(01): 048-052
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1678745
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Cementless Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Trabecular Titanium Implant: Results at Short-to-Medium-Term Follow-Up

Andrea Bertagnon
1   Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano, Italy
,
Luca Celotti
2   School of Medicine, Università degli Studi dell'Insubria, Varese, Lombardia, Italy
,
Fabio D'Angelo
3   Division of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Azienda Socio Sanitarie Territoriale dei Sette Laghi, Varese, Lombardia, Italy
,
Steven Harwin
4   Leni & Peter W. May Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
,
Ettore Vulcano
4   Leni & Peter W. May Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
,
Michele Francesco Surace
5   DBSV - Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, Università degli Studi dell'Insubria, Varese, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

26 April 2018

06 November 2018

Publication Date:
01 March 2019 (online)

Abstract

Over the last two decades, cementless hip prostheses gained increasing popularity. Highly porous, trabecular coatings and their promising bone-friendly properties also came to a wider diffusion. As a consequence, this study was aimed to evaluate clinical and radiographic results at short-to-medium term of cementless prosthetic implants with trabecular titanium cup and titanium femoral metaphyseal stem highly porous coatings. From September 2012 to June 2015 213, cementless total hip arthroplasties were performed in 200 patients. All patients received a cementless Accolade II stem and Tritanium cup with UHMWPE Trident X3 Bearing Technology polyethylene liner. All surgeries were performed using a tissue-sparing modified posterolateral approach. All patients underwent prophylaxis for heterotopic ossifications. For every patient, the following data were collected: age, gender, height, weight, body mass index, blood loss, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin, surgical time, and complications. Harris Hip Score was obtained for every patient. Radiographic measurements were performed using a freeware software (TraumaCAD 2.0). The computed parameters were inclination and anteversion of acetabular cup and presence of heterotopic ossification. The mean follow-up was 37.7 months from surgery. Data were analyzed by SPSS software v 24.0. The postoperative average Harris Hip Score was 87.4 points (range, 40.5–95.7) and 91 patients scored excellent results, with more than 90 points (52.4%). Heterotopic ossifications were seen in 12 patients (6.9%) and correlated to patient weight, surgical timing, and hemoglobin values. There were three cases of dislocation (1.7%) that significantly correlated with cup inclination (R 2 = 17.9; p = 0.018). One cup underwent early revision because of undersizing of the component and subsequent lack of integration, thus leading to an overall survivorship of 99.4%. In conclusion, excellent medium-term functional outcome, patient satisfaction, and low complications rate were observed for the studied implant. A higher incidence of heterotopic ossifications was significantly correlated to patient weight, surgical time, blood loss, and transfusions. Also, inclination of the acetabular cup proved to be correlated to hip dislocation.

 
  • References

  • 1 Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Zhao K, Kelly M, Bozic KJ. Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467 (10) 2606-2612
  • 2 Canadian Institute for Health Information, Canadian Joint Replacement Registry (CJRR) 2007 Annual Report–Hip and Knee Replacements in Canada. Ottawa, Canada: CIHI; 2008
  • 3 Naziri Q, Issa K, Pivec R, Harwin SF, Delanois RE, Mont MA. Excellent results of primary THA using a highly porous titanium cup. Orthopedics 2013; 36 (04) e390-e394
  • 4 Carli AV, Warth LC, de Mesy Bentley KL, Nestor BJ. Short to midterm follow-up of the tritanium primary acetabular component: a cause for concern. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (02) 463-469
  • 5 DiGioia III AM, Blendea S, Jaramaz B, Levison TJ. Less invasive total hip arthroplasty using navigational tools. Instr Course Lect 2004; 53: 157-164
  • 6 Morrey BF, Adams RA, Kessler M. A conservative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000; 82 (07) 952-958
  • 7 Briem D, Schneider M, Bogner N. , et al. Mid-term results of 155 patients treated with a collum femoris preserving (CFP) short stem prosthesis. Int Orthop 2011; 35 (05) 655-660
  • 8 Ettinger M, Ettinger P, Lerch M. , et al. The NANOS short stem in total hip arthroplasty: a mid term follow-up. Hip Int 2011; 21 (05) 583-586
  • 9 Kan SL, Yang B, Ning GZ. , et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as prophylaxis for heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94 (18) e828
  • 10 Romanò CL, Duci D, Romanò D, Mazza M, Meani E. Celecoxib versus indomethacin in the prevention of heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19 (01) 14-18
  • 11 Fijn R, Koorevaar RT, Brouwers JR. Prevention of heterotopic ossification after total hip replacement with NSAIDs. Pharm World Sci 2003; 25 (04) 138-145
  • 12 Lavernia CJ, Contreras JS, Villa JM, Rossi MD. Celecoxib and heterotopic bone formation after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (02) 390-392
  • 13 Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969; 51 (04) 737-755
  • 14 Bono JV. Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A (Suppl 2): 118-22
  • 15 Amaro AJ, Amado F, Mendes A. , et al. Radiographic geometric measures of the hip joint and abductor muscle function in patients after total hip replacement. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2007; 17: 437-443
  • 16 Hug KT, Alton TB, Gee AO. Classifications in brief: Brooker classification of heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (06) 2154-2157
  • 17 Pierce TP, Jauregui JJ, Kapadia BH. , et al. Second-generation versus first-generation cementless tapered wedge femoral stems. Orthopedics 2015; 38 (09) 550-554
  • 18 Kolisek FR, Chughtai M, Mistry JB. , et al. Outcomes of Second-Generation Tapered Wedge Femoral Stem. Surg Technol Int 2016; 28: 275-279
  • 19 Surace MF, Fagetti A, Fozzato S, Cherubino P. Lumbar spinal stenosis treatment with Aperius perclid interspinous system. Eur Spine J 2012; 21 (Suppl. 01) S69-S74
  • 20 Cohn RM, Schwarzkopf R, Jaffe F. Heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 2011; 40 (11) E232-E235
  • 21 Hierton C, Blomgren G, Lindgren U. Factors associated with heterotopic bone formation in cemented total hip prostheses. Acta Orthop Scand 1983; 54 (05) 698-702
  • 22 Eggli S, Woo A. Risk factors for heterotopic ossification in total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2001; 121 (09) 531-535
  • 23 Fransen M, Neal B, Cameron ID. , et al; HIPAID Collaborative Group. Determinants of heterotopic ossification after total hip replacement surgery. Hip Int 2009; 19 (01) 41-46
  • 24 Surace MF, Monestier L, D'Angelo F, Bertagnon A. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis of risk factors at 7 to 10 years follow-up. Surg Technol Int 2016; 30: 274-278
  • 25 Surace MF, Regazzola GM, Vulcano E, Monestier L, Cherubino P. Anterior longitudinal osteotomy of the greater trochanter in total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2015; 38 (08) 490-493