Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology 2019; 02(02): 098-106
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1692021
Review Article
Indian Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology

Tumor Response Criteria in Oncoimaging: RECIST Criteria and beyond—Part 1

1   Department of Radiodiagnosis, Delhi State Cancer Institute, New Delhi, India
,
Akshay D. Baheti
2   Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Anurima Patra
2   Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Sree Harsha Tirumani
3   Department of Imaging, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
4   Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received: 03. März 2019

Accepted after revision: 26. März 2019

Publikationsdatum:
22. Juli 2019 (online)

Preview

Abstract

The rapid recent advances in oncology have made the dream of precision oncology a reality, with targeted therapy available for various tumors depending on the molecular genotype. This has led to the corresponding development of personalized radiology as well, with various tumor response criteria used to characterize disease response/progression depending on chemotherapy used. In these two review articles, we review the various tumor response criteria widely applied in both research and clinical settings. These include the classic size-based criteria such as RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) 1.1 and the WHO (World Health Organization) criteria, as also various other criteria such as Choi and modified Choi criteria for tumors treated by targeted therapy, EASL and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria for hepatocellular carcinomas, and immune-related response criteria (irRC) and immune RECIST (iRECIST) for patients on immunotherapy. Other clinically important criteria such as PERCIST (PET Response Criteria In Solid Tumors) for positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) and the MD Anderson criteria for evaluating bone metastases are also highlighted.