CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 24(01): e80-e85
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693139
Original Research
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

A Comparative Study of Endoscopic versus Microscopic Cartilage Type I Tympanoplasty

1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Civil Service Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
,
Arun KC
2   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal
,
Ajit Nepal
3   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Patan Academy of Health Science, Lalitpur, Nepal
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

17. April 2019

21. Mai 2019

Publikationsdatum:
04. November 2019 (online)

Abstract

Introduction The use of endoscope is rapidly increasing in otological and neuro-otological surgery in the last 2 decades. Middle ear surgeries, including tympanoplasty, have increasingly utilized endoscopes as an adjunct to or as a replacement for the operative microscope. Superior visualization and transcanal access to diseases normally managed with a transmastoid approach are touted as advantages with the endoscope.

Objectives The present study aimed to compare the outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic cartilage tympanoplasty (Type I)

Methods This was a retrospective comparative study of 70 patients (25 males and 45 females) who underwent type I tympanoplasty between March 2015 and April 2016. The subjects were classified into 2 groups: endoscopic tympanoplasty (ET, n = 35), and microscopic tympanoplasty (MT, n = 35). Tragal cartilage was used as a graft and technique used was cartilage shield tympanoplasty in both groups. Demographic data, perforation size of the tympanic membrane at the preoperative state, operation time, hearing outcome, and graft success rate were evaluated.

Results The epidemiological profiles, the preoperative hearing status, and the perforation size were similar in both groups. The mean operation time of the MT group (52.63 ± 8.68 minutes) was longer than that of the ET group (48.20 ± 10.37 minutes), but the difference was not statistically significant. The graft success rates 12 weeks postoperatively were 91.42% both in the ET and MT groups, that is, 32/35; and these values were not statistically significantly different. There was a statistically significant improvement in hearing within the groups, both pre- and postoperatively, but there was no difference between the groups.

Conclusion Endoscopic tympanoplasty is a minimally invasive surgery with similar graft success rate, comparable hearing outcomes and shorter operative time period as compared to microscopic use.

 
  • References

  • 1 Cabra J, Moñux A. Efficacy of cartilage palisade tympanoplasty: randomized controlled trial. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31 (04) 589-595
  • 2 Fukuchi I, Cerchiari DP, Garcia E, Rezende CE, Rapoport PB. Tympanoplasty: surgical results and a comparison of the factors that may interfere in their success. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2006; 72 (02) 267-271
  • 3 Dornhoffer JL. Surgical management of the atelectatic ear. Am J Otol 2000; 21 (03) 315-321
  • 4 Beutner D, Huttenbrink KB, Stumpf R. , et al. Cartilage plate tympanoplasty. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31 (01) 105-110
  • 5 Mudry A. History of myringoplasty and tympanoplasty type I. Otolaryngology—head and neck surgery: official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-. Head Neck Surg 2008; 139 (05) 613-614
  • 6 Tarabichi M. Endoscopic transcanal middle ear surgery. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 62 (01) 6-24
  • 7 Yadav SP, Aggarwal N, Julaha M, Goel A. Endoscope-assisted myringoplasty. Singapore Med J 2009; 50 (05) 510-512
  • 8 el-Guindy A. Endoscopic transcanal myringoplasty. J Laryngol Otol 1992; 106 (06) 493-495
  • 9 Bedajit RK, Mallik P, Kumar P. , et al. Endoscopic transcanal mastoidectomy with tympanoplasty. Natl J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 3 (12) 10-11
  • 10 Huang TY, Ho KY, Wang LF, Chien CY, Wang HM. A Comparative Study of Endoscopic and Microscopic Approach Type 1 Tympanoplasty for Simple Chronic Otitis Media. J Int Adv Otol 2016; 12 (01) 28-31
  • 11 Choi N, Noh Y, Park W. , et al. Comparison of endoscopic tympanoplasty to microscopic tympanoplasty. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 10 (01) 44-49
  • 12 Mokbel KM, Moneir W, Elsisi H. , et al. Endoscopic Transcanal Cartilage Myringoplasty for Repair of Subtotal Tympanic Membrane Perforation: A Method to Avoid Postauricular Incision. J Otolaryngol Rhinol 2015; 1: 010
  • 13 Jyothi AC, Shrikrishna BH, Kulkarni NH, Kumar A. Endoscopic Myringoplasty Versus Microscopic Myringoplasty in Tubotympanic CSOM: A Comparative Study of 120 Cases. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 69 (03) 357-362
  • 14 Kaya I, Sezgin B, Sergin D. , et al. Endoscopic versus microscopic type 1 tympanoplasty in the same patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274 (09) 3343-3349
  • 15 Awad OG, Hamid KA. Endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty in pediatric patients using tragal cartilage. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 141 (06) 532-538
  • 16 Özgür A, Dursun E, Erdivanli OC. , et al. Endoscopic cartilage tympanoplasty in chronic otitis media. J Laryngol Otol 2015; 129 (11) 1073-1077
  • 17 Kanona H, Virk JS, Owa A. Endoscopic ear surgery: A case series and first United Kingdom experience. World J Clin Cases 2015; 3 (03) 310-317
  • 18 Kuo CH, Wu HM. Comparison of endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274 (07) 2727-2732
  • 19 Anschuetz L, Bonali M, Guarino P. , et al. Management of bleeding in exclusive endoscopic ear surgery: pilot clinical experience. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 157 (04) 700-706