Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2019; 41(12): 718-725
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1700587
Original Article
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

The Impact of Systematic Laparoscopic Skills and Suture Training on Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Outcomes in a Brazilian Teaching Hospital

O impacto do treinamento laparoscópico sistematizado de habilidades e sutura nos resultados da histerectomia laparoscópica em hospital universitário brasileiro
Anna Luiza Lobão Gonçalves 
1   Gynecological Endoscopy and Endometriosis Sector, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Helizabet Abdala Ayroza-Ribeiro
1   Gynecological Endoscopy and Endometriosis Sector, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Raquel Ferreira Lima
1   Gynecological Endoscopy and Endometriosis Sector, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Aline Estefane Eras Yonamine
1   Gynecological Endoscopy and Endometriosis Sector, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Fabio Ohara
1   Gynecological Endoscopy and Endometriosis Sector, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Paulo Augusto Galvão Ayroza-Ribeiro
1   Gynecological Endoscopy and Endometriosis Sector, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

15 May 2019

16 September 2019

Publication Date:
19 December 2019 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the impact of systematic laparoscopic skills and suture training (SLSST) on the total laparoscopic hysterectomy intra- and postoperative outcomes in a Brazilian teaching hospital.

Methods A cross-sectional observational study in which 244 charts of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) patients operated from 2008 to 2014 were reviewed. Patient-specific (age, parity, previous cesarean sections, abdominal surgeries and endometriosis) and surgery-related variables (hospital stay, operative time, uterine volume and operative complications) were analyzed in three different time-frame groups: 2008-09 (I-1) – TLHs performed by senior attending physicians; 2010-11 (I-2) – TLHs performed by residents before the implementation of the SLSST program; and 2012-14 (I-3) – TLHs performed by residents after the implementation of the SLSST program.

Results A total of 244 TLH patients (mean age: 45.93 years) were included: 24 (I-1), 55 (I-2), and 165 (I-3). The main indication for TLH was uterine myoma (66.4%). Group I-3 presented a decrease in surgical time compared to group I-2 (p = 0.010). Hospital stay longer than 2 days decreased in group I-3 compared to group I-2 (p = 0.010). Although we observed decreased uterine volume (154.2 cm3) in group I-2 compared to group I-1 (217.8 cm3) (p = 0.030), logistic regression did not find any association between uterine volume and surgical time (p = 0.103).

Conclusion The total operative time for laparoscopic hysterectomy was significantly shorter in the group of patients (I-3) operated after the systematic laparoscopic skills and suture training was introduced in our hospital.

Resumo

Objetivo Avaliar o impacto do treinamento laparoscópico sistematizado de habilidades e sutura (TLSHS) nos resultados intra e pós-operatórios da histerectomia laparoscópica em um hospital universitário brasileiro.

Métodos Estudo observacional transversal de revisão de 244 prontuários de pacientes submetidas a histerectomia total laparoscópica (HTL) operadas entre 2008 e 2014. Os fatores específicos das pacientes (idade, paridade, cesariana prévia, cirurgias abdominais, e endometriose) e as variáveis relacionadas à cirurgia (tempo de hospitalização, tempo de cirurgia, volume uterino e complicações operatórias) foram analisados em três grupos temporais: 2008-09 (I-1) – HTLs realizadas por médicos experientes; 2010-11 (I-2) – HTLs realizadas por residentes sem TLSHS; 2012-2014 (I-3) – HTLs realizadas por residentes após a implementação do TLSHS.

Resultados Um total de 244 pacientes submetidas a HTLs foram incluídas (média de idade de 45,93 anos): 24 operadas no período I1, 55 no I2, e 165 no I3. A principal indicação para HTL foi mioma uterino (66,4%). O grupo I-3 apresentou diminuição no tempo cirúrgico quando comparado ao grupo I-2 (p = 0,010). Hospitalização superior a 2 dias diminuiu no grupo I-3 comparado ao grupo I-2 (p = 0,010). Apesar de observarmos diminuição no volume uterino dos pacientes do grupo I-2 (154,2 cm3) em comparação com os do grupo I-1 (217,8 cm3) (p = 0,030), a regressão logística não revelou associação entre volume uterino e tempo cirúrgico (p = 0,103).

Conclusão O tempo cirúrgico na HTL foi significativamente menor no grupo de pacientes submetidas à cirurgia após a implantação do TLSHS em nosso hospital.

Keywords

hysterectomy - laparoscopic surgery - education - suture training

Palavras-chave

histerectomia - cirurgia laparoscópia - educação - treinamento de sutura

Contributors

All authors contributed with the project and the interpretation of data, the writing of the article, the critical review of the intellectual content, and with the final approval of the version to be published.


 

  • References

  • 1 Arbogast JD, Welch RA, Riza ED, Ricaurte EL, Pieper DR. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy appears to be an alternative to total abdominal hysterectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 1994; 4 (03) 185-190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Reich H. New techniques in advanced laparoscopic surgery. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 3 (03) 655-681
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ng CC, Chern BS. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a 5-year experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2007; 276 (06) 613-618 . Doi: 10.1007/s00404-007-0385-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Chapron C, Laforest L, Ansquer Y. , et al. Hysterectomy techniques used for benign pathologies: results of a French multicentre study. Hum Reprod 1999; 14 (10) 2464-2470 . Doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.10.2464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Chapron CM, Dubuisson JB, Ansquer Y. Is total laparoscopic hysterectomy a safe surgical procedure?. Hum Reprod 1996; 11 (11) 2422-2424 . Doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hohl MK, Hauser N. Safe total intrafascial laparoscopic (TAIL) hysterectomy: a prospective cohort study. Gynecol Surg 2010; 7 (03) 231-239 . Doi: 10.1007/s10397-010-0569-0
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Chapron C, Dubuisson JB. Ureteral injuries after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Hum Reprod 2000; 15 (03) 733-734 . Doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.3.733
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Shwayder JM. The learning curve for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy/laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1994; 1 (4, Part 2): S33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cavalli N, Sória HL, Galletto D, Sória-Vieira S, Bandeira CP, Fagundes DJ. Histerectomia vaginal assistida por videolaparoscopia associada à técnica intrafascial (HVALi) em 579 operações. Rev Bras Videocir 2003; 1: 128-134
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Einarsson JI, Matteson KA, Schulkin J, Chavan NR, Sangi-Haghpeykar H. Minimally invasive hysterectomies-a survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010; 17 (02) 167-175 . Doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.12.017
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cosson M, Lambaudie E, Boukerrou M, Querleu D, Crépin G. Vaginal, laparoscopic, or abdominal hysterectomies for benign disorders: immediate and early postoperative complications. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001; 98 (02) 231-236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sória HLZ, Fagundes DJ, Sória-Vieira S, Cavalli N, Santos CRC. [Hysterectomy and benign gynecological diseases: what has been performed in Medical Residency in Brazil?]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2007; 29: 67-73 . Doi: 10.1590/S0100-72032007000200002
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ministério da Saúde. Procedimentos Hospitalares do SUS – Por Local de Internação - Brasil. 2017 http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/tabcgi.exe?sih/cnv/qiuf.def . Accessed April 29, 2017.
    PubMed
  • 14 Sculpher M, Manca A, Abbott J, Fountain J, Mason S, Garry R. Cost effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with standard hysterectomy: results from a randomised trial. BMJ 2004; 328 (7432): 134 . Doi: 10.1136/bmj.37942.601331.EE
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Campo R, Molinas CR, De Wilde RL. , et al. Are you good enough for your patients? The European certification model in laparoscopic surgery. Facts Views Vis ObGyn 2012; 4 (02) 95-101
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Takeda J, Kikuchi I, Kono A, Ozaki R, Kumakiri J, Takeda S. Efficacy of short-term training for acquisition of basic laparoscopic skills. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 2016; 5: 112-115 . Doi: 10.1016/j.gmit.2015.06.001
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ahlberg G, Enochsson L, Gallagher AG. , et al. Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am J Surg 2007; 193 (06) 797-804 . Doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.050
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Fayez R, Fried GM. Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room-a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg 2010; 199 (01) 115-120 . Doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.07.035
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Clark NV, Gujral HS, Wright KN. . Impact of a fellowship-trained minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon on patient outcomes. JSLS 2017; 21 (03) e2017.00037 . Doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2017.00037
    PubMed
  • 20 Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA. , et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 2002; 236 (04) 458-463, discussion 463–464 . Doi: 10.1097/00000658-200210000-00008
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML. , et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009; 250 (02) 187-196 . Doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Liceaga A, Fernandes LF, Romeo A, Gagstatter F. Romeo's gladiator rule: knots, stitches and knot typing techniques: a tutorial based on a few simple rules; new concepts to teach suturing techniques in laparoscopic surgery. 2nd ed. Schramberg: Endo Press; 2015. .
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Nácul MP, Cavazzola LT, de Melo MC. Current status of residency training in laparoscopic surgery in Brazil: a critical review. Arq Bras Cir Dig 2015; 28 (01) 81-85 . Doi: 10.1590/S0102-67202015000100020
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Dilley SE, Straughn Jr JM, Leath III CA. The evolution of and evidence for opportunistic salpingectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130 (04) 814-824 . Doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002243
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Viganò P, Parazzini F, Somigliana E, Vercellini P. Endometriosis: epidemiology and aetiological factors. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 18 (02) 177-200 . Doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.01.007
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Nakamura-Pereira M, Esteves-Pereira AP, Gama SGN, Leal M. Elective repeat cesarean delivery in women eligible for trial of labor in Brazil. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018; 143 (03) 351-359 . Doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ferreira H, van Belle Y, Tanos V. , et al. Simulation and training of gynaecological skills. Facts Views Vis ObGyn 2018; 10 (01) 21-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Munz Y, Almoudaris AM, Moorthy K, Dosis A, Liddle AD, Darzi AW. Curriculum-based solo virtual reality training for laparoscopic intracorporeal knot tying: objective assessment of the transfer of skill from virtual reality to reality. Am J Surg 2007; 193 (06) 774-783 . Doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.022
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Thuler FR, de Freitas Jr WR, Ilias EJ, Kassab P, Malheiros CA. Laparoscopic bariatric surgery training program model: gastric bypass. BMC Surg 2014; 14: 101 . Doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Mucksavage P, Lee J, Kerbl DC, Clayman RV, McDougall EM. Preoperative warming up exercises improve laparoscopic operative times in an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. J Endourol 2012; 26 (07) 765-768 . Doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Asoğlu MR, Achjian T, Akbilgiç O, Borahay MA, Kılıç GS. The impact of a simulation-based training lab on outcomes of hysterectomy. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2016; 17 (02) 60-64 . Doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2016.16053
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Korndorffer Jr JR, Stefanidis D, Scott DJ. Laparoscopic skills laboratories: current assessment and a call for resident training standards. Am J Surg 2006; 191 (01) 17-22 . Doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.05.048
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Nickel F, Kowalewski KF, Müller-Stich BP. [Risk awareness and training for prevention of complications in minimally invasive surgery]. Chirurg 2015; 86 (12) 1121-1127 . Doi: 10.1007/s00104-015-0097-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar