J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37(01): 051-058
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3401847
Original Article

Attributes of Perforator Flaps for Prophylatic Soft Tissue Augmentation Prior to Definitive Total Knee Arthroplasty

Saïd C. Azoury
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
John T. Stranix
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Merisa Piper
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Stephen J. Kovach
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Geoffrey G. Hallock
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, St. Luke's Hospital, Sacred Heart Division, Allentown, Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background As our population ages, the demand for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) will dramatically increase to ensure an independent lifestyle with unimpeded and pain-free ambulation. Complications will be inevitable, especially in that patient with preexisting soft tissue deficits or extensive scarring in the knee region. Under these circumstances, prophylactic soft tissue augmentation should be strongly considered and be extremely beneficial.

Methods A retrospective review of all TKA procedures at our institutions over the past two decades revealed seven patients who specifically had soft tissue augmentation prior to their definitive TKA. Each had a single perforator flap used to achieve this. In no cases was a muscle flap used for this purpose. Excluded were all patients who had a flap of any kind for coverage of an exposed prosthesis or to accomplish wound healing after the TKA.

Results Seven perforator flaps were utilized in seven patients for soft tissue replacement prior to the ultimate TKA. For smaller defects in three patients, a local island medial sural artery perforator flap was used. For larger defects in four patients, an anterolateral thigh perforator free flap was necessary. All flaps were successful. The only complication was an implant infection after one anterolateral thigh free flap that required a revision arthroplasty that eventually allowed salvage. Unrestricted ambulation was possible in all patients except for one who had a preexisting contralateral below-knee amputation.

Conclusion As the number of TKA procedures in the near future increases, prevention of the absolute number of complications becomes even more important. An awareness that any knee region suboptimal soft tissue base can lead to wound breakdown and then periprosthetic infection should alert all involved that prevention of this sequela can be best achieved by prior soft tissue augmentation. Preferably, this may be possible by capturing the assets of local and free perforator flaps.

Note

This study was presented at the 2020 Meeting of the American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, January 14, 2020.




Publication History

Received: 30 August 2019

Accepted: 28 October 2019

Article published online:
26 December 2019

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Colen DL, Carney MJ, Shubinets V. et al. Soft-tissue reconstruction of the complicated knee arthroplasty: principles and predictors of salvage. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (04) 1040-1048
  • 2 Casey III WJ, Rebecca AM, Krochmal DJ. et al. Prophylactic flap reconstruction of the knee prior to total knee arthroplasty in high-risk patients. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 66 (04) 381-387
  • 3 Economides JM, DeFazio MV, Golshani K. et al. Soft tissue coverage of complex periprosthetic defects in patients with total knee arthroplasty: analysis of factors that influence reconstructive and functional outcomes. Wounds 2018; 30: 283-289
  • 4 Markovich GD, Dorr LD, Klein NE, McPherson EJ, Vince KG. Muscle flaps in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; (321) 122-130
  • 5 Hallock GG. The medial sural artery perforator island flap as a simpler alternative for prophylactic skin augmentation prior to total knee arthroplasty. Int J Orthoplastic Surg. 2019; 2: 1-4
  • 6 Daigeler A, Drücke D, Tatar K. et al. The pedicled gastrocnemius muscle flap: a review of 218 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (01) 250-257
  • 7 Maheshwari AV, Gioe TJ, Kalore NV, Cheng EY. Reinfection after prior staged reimplantation for septic total knee arthroplasty: is salvage still possible?. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25 (6, Suppl) 92-97
  • 8 Gibreel W, Bakri K, Mardini S. The Anterolateral Thigh (ALT) Flap for Lower Extremity Reconstruction. In: Hong JP, Hallock GG. eds. Lower Extremity Reconstruction: A Practical Guide. Thieme; ; In Press
  • 9 Kim ES, Hwang JH, Kim KS, Lee SY. Plantar reconstruction using the medial sural artery perforator free flap. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62 (06) 679-684
  • 10 Hallock GG. A paradigm shift in flap selection protocols for zones of the lower extremity using perforator flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (04) 233-240
  • 11 Hallock GG. The chimera flap: a quarter century odyssey. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 78 (02) 223-229
  • 12 Hallock GG. Chimeric gastrocnemius muscle and sural artery perforator local flap. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 61 (03) 306-309
  • 13 Hallock GG. The medial sural(MEDIAL GASTROCNEMIUS) perforator local flap. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 53 (05) 501-505
  • 14 Millican PG, Poole MD. Peripheral neovascularisation of muscle and musculocutaneous flaps. Br J Plast Surg 1985; 38 (03) 369-374
  • 15 Hallock GG. Local knee random fasciocutaneous flaps. Ann Plast Surg 1989; 23 (04) 289-296
  • 16 Kim JT, Ho SYM, Kim YH. An improved perforator-based island flap: the heart balloon flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (05) 1472-1475
  • 17 Hallock GG. Perforator Advancement Flaps Including the Keystone Flap. In: Hong J, Hallock GG. eds. Lower Extremity Reconstruction: A Practical Guide. Thieme; ; In Press
  • 18 Dusseldorp JR, Pham QJ, Ngo Q, Gianoutsos M, Moradi P. Vascular anatomy of the medial sural artery perforator flap: a new classification system of intra-muscular branching patterns. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (09) 1267-1275
  • 19 Daar DA, Abdou SA, Cohen JM, Wilson SC, Levine JP. Is the medial sural artery perforator flap a new workhorse flap? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143 (02) 393e-403e
  • 20 Wong CH, Wei FC, Fu B, Chen YA, Lin JY. Alternative vascular pedicle of the anterolateral thigh flap: the oblique branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (02) 571-577
  • 21 Lin CH, Zelken J, Hsu CC, Lin CH, Wei FC. The distally based, venous supercharged anterolateral thigh flap. Microsurgery 2016; 36 (01) 20-28
  • 22 Wei FC, Jain V, Celik N, Chen HC, Chuang DCC, Lin CH. Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (07) 2219-2226 , discussion 2227–2230
  • 23 Kosutic D, Pejkovic B, Anderhuber F. et al. Complete mapping of lateral and medial sural artery perforators: anatomical study with Duplex-Doppler ultrasound correlation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (11) 1530-1536
  • 24 Georgescu AV, Matei I, Ardelean F, Capota I. Microsurgical nonmicrovascular flaps in forearm and hand reconstruction. Microsurgery 2007; 27 (05) 384-394