CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Revista Fisioterapia Invasiva / Journal of Invasive Techniques in Physical Therapy 2019; 02(02): 055-061
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3402789
Special Article
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Clinical criteria for the application of percutaneous needle electrolysis in tendinopathies: An expert Consensus cocument and cross-sectional study among physical therapists

Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: English | español
Fermín Valera Garrido
1   MVClinic. Madrid, España. Universidad CEU San Pablo, Madrid. Getafe CF, Spain
,
Fernando Polidori
2   Kinesiología Polidori, Mendoza, Argentina
,
Jerónimo Benavent Canet
3   Fisio Global Sport, Valencia, Spain
,
Francesc i Sicarrats Botet
4   L'estudi Sport Vic, Barcelona. F.C.Wuhan (Superliga China), Wuhan, China
,
Pablo Martínez Ramírez
5   Valencia Basket, Valencia, España. Fisiosport, Valencia, Spain
,
Sandra Calvo
6   Grupo de investigación iPhysio. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad San Jorge. Campus Universitario, Zaragoza, Spain
,
Javier Belsué Pastora
6   Grupo de investigación iPhysio. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad San Jorge. Campus Universitario, Zaragoza, Spain
,
Francisco Minaya Muñoz
1   MVClinic. Madrid, España. Universidad CEU San Pablo, Madrid. Getafe CF, Spain
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

16. Dezember 2019

17. Dezember 2019

Publikationsdatum:
20. Dezember 2019 (online)

Abstract

Introduction Percutaneous needle electrolysis is a technique of invasive physical therapy which has been applied successfully in tendinopathies over the last decade. This study sought to explore the opinion and criteria employed by physical therapists who apply this technique in tendinopathies.

Material and Methods A cross-sectional study based on a survey of 15 questions to gather the sociodemographic characteristics of attendees and to examine four dimensions associated with the application of percutaneous needle electrolysis (indications, dosage, ultrasound-guidance, supporting therapies). The participants voted on the survey simultaneously after installing the “Votephone” App on their mobile phones or smartphones.

Results The study participants included 212 people who attended the CIFI 2018 conference and four experts. Of those who responded, 74.5% were men, who were mainly dedicated to clinical work (91.8%), and were aged between 25 and 45 years (97.6%). Electrolysis was used by 79% of respondents in their daily practice, for which 32.89% had over six years' experience. Percutaneous needle electrolysis was considered the therapy of choice in the treatment of tendinopathies for 91.03% of respondents, whereas 98.67% used it in situations of chronicity, and for tissue repair purposes (85%). Of all people surveyed, 97.74% considered that ultrasound guidance was essential for its application, employing intensities of between 2-4 mA (59.60%) and combined with therapeutic exercise (77.78%). Ultrasound in B mode (50.85%) and palpation with the needle and reproduction of symptoms (47.46%) are the criteria used to define the area of intervention.

Conclusions Percutaneous needle electrolysis is often used by physical therapists in chronic tendinopathies, applying high intensities (2-4 mA) aimed at repair of the damaged tissue. Attendees considered that the use of ultrasound for assessment and as a guide for the intervention is essential to guarantee a safe application and improve effectiveness. Percutaneous needle electrolysis is most commonly associated with therapeutic exercise.

 
  • References

  • 1 Riley G. Chronic tendon pathology: molecular basis and therapeutic implications. Expert Rev Mol Med 2005; 7 (05) 1-25
  • 2 Khan KM, Cook JL, Bonar F, Harcourt P, Åstrom M. Histopathology of common tendinopathies. Update and implications for clinical management. Sports Med 1999; 27 (06) 393-408
  • 3 Dirks RC, Warden SJ. Models for the study of tendinopathy. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2011; 11 (02) 141-149
  • 4 Barr AE, Barbe MF, Clark BD. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the hand and wrist: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and sensorimotor changes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2004; 34 (10) 610-627
  • 5 Federer AE, Steele JR, Dekker TJ, Liles JL, Adams SB. Tendonitis and Tendinopathy: What are they and how do they evolve?. Foot Ankle Clin 2017; 22 (04) 665-676
  • 6 Everhart JS, Cole D, Sojka JH. , et al. Treatment Options for Patellar Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy 2017; 33 (04) 861-872
  • 7 Valera-Garrido F, Minaya-Muñoz F, Medina-Mirapeix F. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle electrolysis in chronic lateral epicondylitis: short-term and long-term results. Acupunct Med 2014; 32 (06) 446-454
  • 8 Mani-Babu S, Morrissey D, Waugh C, Screen H, Barton C. The effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in lower limb tendinopathy: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (03) 752-761
  • 9 Zhou Y, Wang JHC. PRP Treatment Efficacy for Tendinopathy: A Review of Basic Science Studies. Biomed Res Int 2016 2016
  • 10 Abat F, Diesel WJ, Gelber PE, Polidori F, Monllau JC, Sanchez-Ibañez JM. Effectiveness of the Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis (EPI®) technique and isoinertial eccentric exercise in the treatment of patellar tendinopathy at two years follow-up. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 2014; 4 (02) 188-193
  • 11 Arias-Buriá JL, Truyols-Domínguez S, Valero-Alcaide R, Salom-Moreno J, Atín-Arratibel MA, Fernández-De-Las-Penãs C. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Electrolysis and Eccentric Exercises for Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Evidence-based Complement Altern Med 2015 2015
  • 12 Moreno C, Mattiussi G, Núñez FJ. Therapeutic results after ultrasound-guided intratissue percutaneous electrolysis (EPI®) in the treatment of rectus abdominis-related groin pain in professional footballers: a pilot study. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2016; 56 (10) 1171-1178