Endoscopy 2020; 52(S 01): S227
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1704710
ESGE Days 2020 ePoster Podium presentations
Saturday, April 25, 2020 14:30 – 15:00 FNA vs FNB for PANCREATIC CANCER ePoster Podium 3
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

PERFORMANCE OF EUS-FNA WITH A NEW FLEXIBLE 19 G NEEDLE FOR DIAGNOSING SOLID LESIONS OF THE HEAD AND UNCINATE PROCESS OF THE PANCREAS. PROSPECTIVE, MULTICENTER STUDY

G Fernández-Esparrach
1   Endoscopy Unit. Hospital Clinic. University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
2   IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
3   Ciberehd, Barcelona, Spain
,
Pietro Fusaroli
4   U.O.C. Gastroenterology AUSL, Imola, Italy
,
O Sendino
1   Endoscopy Unit. Hospital Clinic. University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
2   IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
3   Ciberehd, Barcelona, Spain
,
A Seicean
5   Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
,
AZ Gimeno-García
6   Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Gastroenterology Department, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
,
A Lisotti
4   U.O.C. Gastroenterology AUSL, Imola, Italy
,
A Cominardi
4   U.O.C. Gastroenterology AUSL, Imola, Italy
,
J Gratacós-Ginès
1   Endoscopy Unit. Hospital Clinic. University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
,
A Montenegro
1   Endoscopy Unit. Hospital Clinic. University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
,
A Ginès
1   Endoscopy Unit. Hospital Clinic. University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
2   IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
3   Ciberehd, Barcelona, Spain
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 April 2020 (online)

 

Aims Large bore needles aim to overcome the frequent unavailability of the rapid on site evaluation (ROSE) of the EUS-FNA samples. However, its rigidity causes a high failure of the technique in lesions of the head and uncinated process of the pancreas.

Objective To evaluate the technical and diagnostic success of a 19 G new nitinol needle with a multilayer coil sheath (EZ Shot 3 plus, Olympus) in solid lesions of the head and uncinated process of the pancreas.

Methods Prospective and multicenter study. A maximum of 5 passes with the study needle were allowed.

Results We included 75 patients (51% males) with lesions in the head (n = 68; 91%) and uncinated process (n = 7; 9%) (mean size: 33 ± 12 mm; number of passes: 1.8 ± 0.9). The technical success rate was 71/75 (94.7%) and the diagnosis success was 89.3% (67/75) and 94.4% (67/71) in a ITT and PP analysis, respectively. Final diagnoses were: adenocarcinoma (n = 59), TNE (n = 5), metastasis (n = 2), lymphoma (n = 2) and others (n = 7). In the 8 cases without diagnosis with the needle, it was obtained with an alternative needle of 22 or 25 G (n = 4), FNA of another lesion (n = 3), follow up (n = 1). A histological sample was obtained in 64/71 (90%) and immunohistochemistry was successfully performed in 11/13 lesions in which it was required. ROSE was performed in 40 (53%) cases with no differences between ROSE and non-ROSE groups regarding diagnostic success (87.5% vs 91%, p = 0.582) or diagnoses at the first pass (70% vs 81%, p = 0.289). The number of passes was lower in the ROSE group (1.4 ± 0.9 vs 2.2 ± 0.7, p = 0.000).

Conclusions The EZ Shot 3 plus has a high technical and diagnostic success in solid masses in the head and uncinated process of the pancreas. This new needle may be a good choice when on-site evaluation is not possible.