Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator Flap as a Workhorse Flap: Systematic Review and Meta-analysisFunding None.
Background There are various advantages and disadvantages attributed to superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap. The aim of this study is to evaluate the versatility and reliability of free SCIP flap by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature in terms of flap characteristics, pedicle types, and outcomes, including the different types of flap elevations.
Methods PubMed, Embase OVID, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched up to January 2019. All original articles and case reports published in English were included in the analysis. Anatomic descriptions, cadaveric studies, conference presentations, letter to the editors, local SCIP flaps, and review articles were excluded.
Results A total of 36 articles including 907 SCIP flaps were available for the analysis. The most frequent causes of defects were tumors (38.2%) and lower extremities were the most common recipient areas (62.7%). The average flap dimension was 73.3 ± 23.0 cm2 with a pedicle length of 5.0 ± 0.6 cm. Vessel diameter average was 0.67 ± 0.12 mm. The average number of deep branch and superficial branch used per study was 14.4 ± 8.7 (18%) and 93.3 ± 75.0 (84%), respectively. Flap failure rate and complication rate were 2.7 and 4.2%, respectively.
Conclusion SCIP flaps have been shown to be versatile in various aspects of reconstruction. The attributed disadvantages such as having short pedicle and small vessel diameter do not seem to limit the variable usage of this flap. Therefore, SCIP flap should be considered a workhorse flap.
This study presented at the 9th R&R (Research and Reconstruction) Forum held on May 9–10, 2019, in Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Received: 06 April 2020
Accepted: 17 May 2020
29 June 2020 (online)
Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
- 1 Koshima I, Nanba Y, Tsutsui T. , et al. Superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap for reconstruction of limb defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113 (01) 233-240
- 2 Iida T, Mihara M, Yoshimatsu H, Narushima M, Koshima I. Versatility of the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap in head and neck reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 72 (03) 332-336
- 3 Choi JW, Kim YC, Oh TS, Koh KS, Jeong WS. The versatile use of revisited de-epithelialization concept in superficial circumflex iliac and anterolateral thigh perforator free flap for head and neck reconstructions. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2017; 45 (06) 872-880
- 4 Hong JP, Sun SH, Ben-Nakhi M, Hong JP, Sun SH, Ben-Nakhi M. Modified superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap and supermicrosurgery technique for lower extremity reconstruction: a new approach for moderate-sized defects. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 71 (04) 380-383
- 5 Narushima M, Iida T, Kaji N. , et al. Superficial circumflex iliac artery pure skin perforator-based superthin flap for hand and finger reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (06) 827-834
- 6 Tashiro K, Yamashita S. Superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap for dorsalis pedis reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017; 5 (04) e1308
- 7 Miran B. Genel Istatistik. Bergisch Gladbach: Lambert Academic Publishing; 2018. . Available at: https://www.abebooks.com/Genel-Istatistik-Bülent-Miran-LAP-Lambert/22770092695/bd (PMID: . Accessed October 20, 2019)
- 8 Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M. Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons; 2006. . Doi: 10.1002/0470870168
- 9 Sterne JAC, Egger M, Smith GD. Systematic reviews in health care: investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. BMJ 2001; 323 (7304): 101-105
- 10 Sterne JAC, Gavaghan D, Egger M. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53 (11) 1119-1129
- 11 Friedrich JB, Pederson WC, Bishop AT, Galaviz P, Chang J. New workhorse flaps in hand reconstruction. Hand (N Y) 2012; 7 (01) 45-54
- 12 Koshima I, Nanba Y, Tsutsui T, Itoh S. Sequential vascularized iliac bone graft and a superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap with a single source vessel for established mandibular defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113 (01) 101-106
- 13 Yoshimatsu H, Yamamoto T, Iida T. Pedicle elongation technique of superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (03) e61-e62
- 14 Ma C, Tian Z, Kalfarentzos E, He Y. Superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap: a promising candidate for large soft tissue reconstruction of retromolar and lateral buccal defects after oncologic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 73 (08) 1641-1650
- 15 Sinna R, Hajji H, Qassemyar Q, Perignon D, Benhaim T, Havet E. Anatomical background of the perforator flap based on the deep branch of the superficial circumflex iliac artery (SCIP Flap): a cadaveric study. Eplasty 2010; 10: e11
- 16 Suh HSP, Jeong HH, Choi DH, Hong JPJPP. Study of the medial superficial perforator of the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap using computed tomographic angiography and surgical anatomy in 142 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (03) 738-748
- 17 Berner JE, Nikkhah D, Zhao J, Prousskaia E, Teo TC. The versatility of the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap: a single surgeon's 16-year experience for limb reconstruction and a systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (02) 93-103
- 18 Gentileschi S, Servillo M, De Bonis F. , et al. Radioanatomical study of the pedicle of the superficial circumflex iliac perforator flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (09) 669-676
- 19 Hong JP, Sun SH, Ben-Nakhi M. Modified superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap and supermicrosurgery technique for lower extremity reconstruction: a new approach for moderate-sized defects. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 71 (04) 380-383