PDF herunterladen
J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36(08): 616-624
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713668
Original Article

Perforator Variability of the Anterolateral Thigh Flap Identified on Computed Tomographic Angiography: Anatomic and Clinical Implications

Oriana D. Cohen
1   Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York
,
Salma A. Abdou
2   Department of Plastic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
,
Ian T. Nolan
1   Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York
,
Pierre B. Saadeh
1   Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background The anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap is a useful flap with minimal donor site morbidity. Preoperative computed tomographic angiography (CTA) for lower extremity reconstruction can determine vessel integrity and plan for recipient vascular targets. This study reviews lower extremity CTAs to further characterize ALT vascular anatomy and associated clinical implications thereof.

Patients and Methods Lower extremity CTA studies were retrospectively reviewed, and information on ALT cutaneous perforator location, origin, and course was collected.

Results A total of 58 lateral circumflex femoral artery (LCFA) systems in 31 patients were included. Average age was 38.8 ± 15.9 years with mean body mass index of 27.2 ± 5.7 kg/m2. The majority of patients were females (23, 74.2%). The LCFA most commonly originated from the profunda femoris artery (87.3%), followed by the distal common femoral artery (9.1%). On average, there were 1.66 ± 0.69 cm perforators per extremity, with an average of 5.38 cm between adjacent perforators. Perforators originated from the descending branch of the LCFA in 89.6% of studies. Perforator caliber was <1 mm (29, 30.2%), 1 to 2 mm (55, 57.3%), or >2 mm (12, 12.5%). Mean distance from the most proximal perforator to the anterior superior iliac spine was 20.4 ± 4.82 cm. Perforators were musculocutaneous (46.9%), septocutaneous (34.4%), or septomyocutaneous (18.8%). In 58.1% of patients, only one thigh had easily dissectable septocutaneous and/or septomyocutaneous perforators, in which case preoperative CTA aided in donor thigh selection.

Conclusion ALT flap cutaneous perforator anatomy varies considerably. Using CTA, we report on rates of septocutaneous, myocutaneous, and septomyocutaneous perforators and underscore its utility in perforator selection.

Keywords

anterolateral thigh flap - perforator flap - perforator anatomy - computed tomography angiography - microvascular reconstruction - perforator variability

Funding

None.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 01. Februar 2020

Angenommen: 17. Mai 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
08. Juli 2020

Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

 

  • References

  • 1 Nasajpour H, Steele MH. Anterolateral thigh free flap for “head-to-toe” reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 66 (05) 530-533
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wei FC, Jain V, Celik N, Chen HC, Chuang DC, Lin CH. Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (07) 2219-2226 , discussion 2227–2230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S. , et al. Anterolateral thigh flap donor-site complications and morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (03) 584-589
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ali RS, Bluebond-Langner R, Rodriguez ED, Cheng MH. The versatility of the anterolateral thigh flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (06) e395-e407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Song YG, Chen GZ, Song YL. The free thigh flap: a new free flap concept based on the septocutaneous artery. Br J Plast Surg 1984; 37 (02) 149-159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Lee YC, Chen WC, Chou TM, Shieh SJ. Anatomical variability of the anterolateral thigh flap perforators: vascular anatomy and its clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (04) 1097-1107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Rozen WM, Ashton MW, Pan WR. , et al. Anatomical variations in the harvest of anterolateral thigh flap perforators: a cadaveric and clinical study. Microsurgery 2009; 29 (01) 16-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Valdatta L, Tuinder S, Buoro M, Thione A, Faga A, Putz R. Lateral circumflex femoral arterial system and perforators of the anterolateral thigh flap: an anatomic study. Ann Plast Surg 2002; 49 (02) 145-150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Seth R, Manz RM, Dahan IJ. , et al. Comprehensive analysis of the anterolateral thigh flap vascular anatomy. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011; 13 (05) 347-354
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Wong CH, Wei FC, Fu B, Chen YA, Lin JY. Alternative vascular pedicle of the anterolateral thigh flap: the oblique branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (02) 571-577
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S, Nakatsuka T, Harii K. Anatomic variations and technical problems of the anterolateral thigh flap: a report of 74 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (05) 1517-1523
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Zhou G, Qiao Q, Chen GY, Ling YC, Swift R. Clinical experience and surgical anatomy of 32 free anterolateral thigh flap transplantations. Br J Plast Surg 1991; 44 (02) 91-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Koshima I, Fukuda H, Utunomiya R, Soeda S. The anterolateral thigh flap; variations in its vascular pedicle. Br J Plast Surg 1989; 42 (03) 260-262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Choi SW, Park JY, Hur MS. , et al. An anatomic assessment on perforators of the lateral circumflex femoral artery for anterolateral thigh flap. J Craniofac Surg 2007; 18 (04) 866-871
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Garvey PB, Selber JC, Madewell JE, Bidaut L, Feng L, Yu P. A prospective study of preoperative computed tomographic angiography for head and neck reconstruction with anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (04) 1505-1514
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Liu SC, Chiu WK, Chen SY, Lee TP, Wang HW, Chen SG. Comparison of surgical result of anterolateral thigh flap in reconstruction of through-and-through cheek defect with/without CT angiography guidance. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2011; 39 (08) 633-638
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Yang JF, Wang BY, Zhao ZH, Zhou P, Pang F, Sun WD. Clinical applications of preoperative perforator planning using CT angiography in the anterolateral thigh perforator flap transplantation. Clin Radiol 2013; 68 (06) 568-573
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kim EK, Kang BS, Hong JP. The distribution of the perforators in the anterolateral thigh and the utility of multidetector row computed tomography angiography in preoperative planning. Ann Plast Surg 2010; 65 (02) 155-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ribuffo D, Atzeni M, Saba L, Milia A, Guerra M, Mallarini G. Angio computed tomography preoperative evaluation for anterolateral thigh flap harvesting. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62 (04) 368-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Contedini F, Negosanti L, Pinto V. , et al. Tensor fascia latae perforator flap: an alternative reconstructive choice for anterolateral thigh flap when no sizable skin perforator is available. Indian J Plast Surg 2013; 46 (01) 55-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Namgoong S, Yoon YD, Yoo KH, Han SK, Kim WK, Dhong ES. Alternative choices for anterolateral thigh flaps lacking suitable perforators: a systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (07) 465-471
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lakhiani C, Lee MR, Saint-Cyr M. Vascular anatomy of the anterolateral thigh flap: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (06) 1254-1268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hubmer MG, Feigl G. Alternative vascular pedicle of the anterolateral thigh flap: does an oblique branch really exist?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (05) 1580-1581 , author reply 1581
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Deng C, Nie K, Wei Z. , et al. Is the oblique branch a preferable vascular pedicle for anterolateral thigh free flaps?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (07) 478-484
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Deng C, Li H, Wei Z. , et al. Various surgical techniques to create an aesthetic appearance at the donor site of anterolateral thigh free flaps based on the oblique branch: Twenty-one clinical case reports. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97 (07) e9885
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Duymaz A, Karabekmez FE, Vrtiska TJ, Mardini S, Moran SL. Free tissue transfer for lower extremity reconstruction: a study of the role of computed angiography in the planning of free tissue transfer in the posttraumatic setting. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (02) 523-529
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lee GK, Fox PM, Riboh J. , et al. Computed tomography angiography in microsurgery: indications, clinical utility, and pitfalls. Eplasty 2013; 13: e42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 De Beule T, Van Deun W, Vranckx J, de Dobbelaere B, Maleux G, Heye S. Anatomical variations and pre-operative imaging technique concerning the anterolateral thigh flap: guiding the surgeon. Br J Radiol 2016; 89 (1063): 20150920
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Jiang C, Guo F, Li N. , et al. Multipaddled anterolateral thigh chimeric flap for reconstruction of complex defects in head and neck. PLoS ONE 2014; 9 (09) e106326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Kim SW, Kim KN, Hong JP, Park SW, Park CR, Yoon CS. Use of the chimeric anterolateral thigh free flap in lower extremity reconstruction. Microsurgery 2015; 35 (08) 634-639
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Zhang Y, Pan X, Yang H, Yang Y, Huang H, Rui Y. Computed tomography angiography for the chimeric anterolateral thigh flap in the reconstruction of the upper extremity. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (03) 211-217
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Chiu WK, Lin WC, Chen SY. , et al. Computed tomography angiography imaging for the chimeric anterolateral thigh flap in reconstruction of full thickness buccal defect. ANZ J Surg 2011; 81 (03) 142-147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Smit JM, Klein S, Werker PM. An overview of methods for vascular mapping in the planning of free flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (09) e674-e682
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Xiao W, Li K, Kiu-Huen Ng S. , et al. A prospective comparative study of color doppler ultrasound and infrared thermography in the detection of perforators for anterolateral thigh flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 84 (5S): (Suppl. 03) S190-S195
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Wang Z, Yi X, He J. , et al. Catheter-based computed tomography angiography in anterolateral thigh perforator mapping of chinese patients. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (03) 221-228
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Rozen WM, Ribuffo D, Atzeni M. , et al. Current state of the art in perforator flap imaging with computed tomographic angiography. Surg Radiol Anat 2009; 31 (08) 631-639
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 La Padula S, Hersant B, Meningaud JP. Intraoperative use of indocyanine green angiography for selecting the more reliable perforator of the anterolateral thigh flap: a comparison study. Microsurgery 2018; 38 (07) 738-744
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Lim S, Atwi N, Long S, Toshav A, Lau FH. Variations in the anterolateral thigh flap's vascular anatomy in African Americans. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (04) 300-306
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Zachara M, Drozdowski P, Wysocki M, Siewiera I, Wójcicki P. Anatomical variability of the anterolateral thigh flap perforators between sexes: a cadaveric study. Eur J Plast Surg 2013; 36 (03) 179-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Watanabe M, Murakami R, Miyauchi R, Amano N, Moriuchi Y, Imachi K. Utility of preoperative multidetector-row computed tomographic angiography after sublingual nitroglycerin with three-dimensional reconstruction in planning of the anterolateral thigh flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (02) 407e-411e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Lu D, Chan P, Ferris S, Shayan R, Angliss M, Bruscino-Raiola F. Anatomic symmetry of anterolateral thigh flap perforators: a computed tomography angiographic study. ANZ J Surg 2019; 89 (05) 584-588
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Artero GE, Ulla M, Neligan PC, Angrigiani CH. Bilateral anatomic variation of anterolateral thigh flap in the same individual. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (05) e1677
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Steve AK, White CP, Alkhawaji A, Hayakawa TEJ, Buchel EW, Morris SF. Computed tomographic angiography used for localization of the cutaneous perforators and selection of anterolateral thigh flap “bail-out” branches. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 81 (01) 87-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar