CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology 2021; 04(01): 003-007
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716605
Original Article

Yield and Safety of Transjugular Versus Percutaneous Liver Biopsies in Suspected Cases of Diffuse Liver Disease and Correlation of Yield of Transjugular Liver Biopsy with Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient

Mousam Dey
1   Division of Radiodiagnosis, Department of Intervention Radiology, Indian Institute of Liver and Digestive Sciences, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Simi Das
2   Department of Radiodiagnosis, Ruby General Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Argha Chatterjee
3   Department of Radiology and Imaging, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Agnibha Dutta
4   Division of General Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, IPGMER and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Ranajoy Ghosh
5   Department of Pathology, GI Pathology, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, IPGMER, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Jayanta Dasgupta
6   Department of Gastroenterology, Indian Institute of Liver and Digestive Sciences, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
› Author Affiliations


Background Liver biopsy is indicated in both diagnosis and prognosis of diffuse liver diseases. Conventionally, percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) is used, as it is easily available, affordable and has a shorter procedure time, whereas transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) is used in the setting of ascites and coagulopathy. Our aim is to evaluate the diagnostic yield of TJLB in comparison to PLB with tract embolization. Our secondary aims were to evaluate whether there is any difference in rate of major and minor complications between the two procedures and evaluate whether there is any correlation between diagnostic yield of TJLB and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG).

Methods In this retrospective study, we included a total of consecutive 123 patients who underwent liver biopsy through percutaneous (n = 97) and transjugular route (n = 26). We compared the yield of the specimen based on the number of complete portal tracts (CPT).

Results There was no significant difference between mean CPT in TJLB and PLB specimens (mean CPT of TJLB and PLB were 10.9 ± 2.7 and 11.6 ±2.5, respectively [p = 0.566]). There was a moderate but significant negative correlation between the total number of CPT and HVPG in the TJLB group (Spearman’s rho − 0.58) (p = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference in minor complication between the two procedures. Only one patient who underwent PLB developed major complication and none of TLJB procedure had any major complication.

Conclusion Yield of tissue and complication rates are comparable in TJLB and PLB groups. Yield of tissue in TJLB have intermediate but significant negative correlation with HVPG.

Publication History

Article published online:
10 September 2020

© 2020. Indian Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

  • References

  • 1 Guido M, Rugge M. Liver biopsy sampling in chronic viral hepatitis. Semin Liver Dis 2004; 24 (01) 89-97
  • 2 Meng HC, Lin HC, Huang CC. et al. Transjugular liver biopsy: comparison with percutaneous liver biopsy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1994; 9 (05) 457-461
  • 3 Kalambokis G, Manousou P, Vibhakorn S. et al. Transjugular liver biopsy–indications, adequacy, quality of specimens, and complications–a systematic review. J Hepatol 2007; 47 (02) 284-294
  • 4 Cholongitas E, Senzolo M, Standish R. et al. A systematic review of the quality of liver biopsy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 2006; 125 (05) 710-721
  • 5 Miraglia R, Maruzzelli L, Minervini MI. et al. Transjugular liver biopsy in liver transplant patients using an 18-gauge automated core biopsy needle. Eur J Radiol 2011; 80 (03) e269-e272
  • 6 Kis B, Pamarthi V, Fan CM, Rabkin D, Baum RA. Safety and utility of transjugular liver biopsy in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24 (01) 85-89
  • 7 Govender P, Jonas MM, Alomari AI. et al. Sonography-guided percutaneous liver biopsies in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201 (03) 645-650 (AJR)
  • 8 Potter C, Hogan MJ, Kendjorsky H, Balint J, Barnard JA. Safety of percutaneous liver biopsy by interventional radiologists. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2001; 53: 202-205
  • 9 Pathak K, Gopinath M, Salgotra KR. Transjugular liver biopsy. Med J Armed Forces India 2013; 69 (04) 384-387
  • 10 Sawyerr AM, McCormick PA, Tennyson GS. et al. A comparison of transjugular and plugged-percutaneous liver biopsy in patients with impaired coagulation. J Hepatol 1993; 17 (01) 81-85
  • 11 Atar E, Ben Ari Z, Bachar GN. et al. A comparison of transjugular and plugged-percutaneous liver biopsy in patients with contraindications to ordinary percutaneous liver biopsy and an “in-house” protocol for selecting the procedure of choice. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2010; 33 (03) 560-564
  • 12 Jana M, Gamanagatti S. Transjugular liver biopsy: tips and tricks. Trop Gastroenterol 2012; 33 (03) 168-172
  • 13 Lee K, Taylor A, Bartolome B. et al. Left is alright: outcomes of transjugular liver biopsy in patients with left-lobe-only liver transplants. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 28 (02) 94-95