Psychosocial Well-Being of Adults Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing
Background Psychosocial well-being can interfere with engagement in activities of daily life. Consideration of psychosocial domains within hearing health care can expand audiologists' ability to understand treatment barriers and provide an opportunity to jointly address challenges.
Purpose This study explored psychosocial well-being and predictors among adults who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH).
Research Design Cross-sectional survey.
Study Sample Two-hundred and sixty-nine surveys were included in the analysis.
Data Collection and Analysis Data were collected online. Backward elimination regression analyses were used to identify significant predictors of psychosocial well-being.
Results Findings indicated most (∼70–80%) of the respondents' scores were below clinical cut-off for psychological distress, self-efficacy, quality of life, overall well-being, functioning, and relationship satisfaction, with the remainder falling between mild to severe clinical cut-offs. Psychological distress was predicted by more psychological inflexibility, presence of additional disabilities, and younger age. Increased functional impairment was predicted by psychological inflexibility.
Conclusion The majority of adults who are DHH in this study had positive indicators for psychosocial well-being. Screening patients for psychological flexibility could be included in standard hearing health care practices to help clinicians identify individuals who may benefit from additional or different support.
Portions of this paper were presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association convention in 2019.
Received: 15 April 2020
Accepted: 18 June 2020
09 December 2020 (online)
© 2020. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
- 1 Center for Disease Control. Well-being concepts. 2018 . Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/wellbeing.htm . Accessed September 1, 2020
- 2 Healthy People. Health-related quality of life & well-being. 2020 . Available at: at https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/health-related-quality-of-life-well-being . Accessed on February 12, 2020
- 3 World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). 2018 . Available at: https://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/ . Accessed September 1, 2020
- 4 Nachtegaal J, Smit JH, Smits C. et al. The association between hearing status and psychosocial health before the age of 70 years: results from an internet-based national survey on hearing. Ear Hear 2009; 30 (03) 302-312
- 5 Bosdriesz JR, Stam M, Smits C, Kramer SE. Psychosocial health of cochlear implant users compared to that of adults with and without hearing aids: results of a nationwide cohort study. Clin Otolaryngol 2018; 43 (03) 828-834
- 6 Preminger JE, Meeks S. The influence of mood on the perception of hearing-loss related quality of life in people with hearing loss and their significant others. Int J Audiol 2010; 49 (04) 263-271
- 7 Barker AB, Leighton P, Ferguson MA. Coping together with hearing loss: a qualitative meta-synthesis of the psychosocial experiences of people with hearing loss and their communication partners. Int J Audiol 2017; 56 (05) 297-305
- 8 Grenness C, Hickson L, Laplante-Lévesque A, Davidson B. Patient-centred care: a review for rehabilitative audiologists. Int J Audiol 2014; 53 (Suppl. 01) S60-S67
- 9 Ekberg K, Grenness C, Hickson L. Addressing patients' psychosocial concerns regarding hearing aids within audiology appointments for older adults. Am J Audiol 2014; 23 (03) 337-350
- 10 Coleman CK, Muñoz K, Ong CW, Butcher GM, Nelson L, Twohig M. Opportunities for audiologists to use patient-centered communication during hearing device monitoring encounters. Semin Hear 2018; 39 (01) 32-43
- 11 Convery E, Meyer C, Keidser G, Hickson L. Assessing hearing loss self-management in older adults. Int J Audiol 2018; 57 (04) 313-320
- 12 Henry JD, Crawford JR. The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol 2005; 44 (Pt 2): 227-239
- 13 Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M. eds. Measures in Health Psychology: A User's Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs. Windsor, England: NFER-NELSON; 1995: 35-37
- 14 Schwarzer R. Everything you wanted to know about the General Self-Efficacy Scale but were afraid to ask. 2014 . Available at: http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/∼health/faq_gse.pdf . Accessed October 3, 2019
- 15 Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The rand 36-item health survey 1.0. Health Econ 1993; 2 (03) 217-227
- 16 Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated; 2000
- 17 Keyes CL. Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. J Consult Clin Psychol 2005; 73 (03) 539-548
- 18 Westerhof GJ, Keyes CL. Mental illness and mental health: the two continua model across the lifespan. J Adult Dev 2010; 17 (02) 110-119
- 19 Mundt JC, Marks IM, Shear MK, Greist JH. The Work and Social Adjustment Scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatry 2002; 180 (05) 461-464
- 20 Maroufizadeh S, Omani-Samani R, Almasi-Hashiani A, Navid B, Sobati B, Amini P. The Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS) in infertile patients: a reliability and validity study. Middle East Fertil Soc J 2018; 23 (04) 471-475
- 21 Dinkel A, Balck F. An evaluation of the German Relationship Assessment Scale. Swiss J Psychol 2005; 64 (04) 259-263
- 22 Marcus DA, Richards KL, Chambers JF, Bhowmick A. Fibromyalgia family and relationship impact exploratory survey. Musculoskelet Care 2013; 11 (03) 125-134
- 23 Wachholtz A, Bhowmick A, Herbert LB, Marcus D. More is not always better: an epidemiological assessment of migraine frequency and the impact on relationships. J Pain Manag Med 2017; 3 (02) 126
- 24 Hendrick SS, Dicke A, Hendrick C. The Relationship Assessment Scale. J Soc Pers Relat 1998; 15 (01) 137-142
- 25 Ong CW, Whicker JJ, Muñoz K, Twohig MP. Measuring Psychological Inflexibility in Adult and Child Hearing Loss. 2019 . Available at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2798&context=psych_facpub . Accessed September 1, 2020
- 26 Hayes SC, Strosahl K, Wilson KG. et al. Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. Psychol Rec 2004; 54 (04) 553-578
- 27 Sandoz EK, Wilson KG, Merwin RM, Kellum K. Assessment of body image flexibility: The Body Image-Acceptance and Action Questionnaire. J Contextual Behav Sci 2013; 2 (1-2): 39-48
- 28 McCracken LM, Vowles KE, Eccleston C. Acceptance of chronic pain: component analysis and a revised assessment method. Pain 2004; 107 (1-2): 159-166
- 29 Gifford EV, Kohlenberg BS, Hayes SC, Antonuccio DO, Piasecki MM, Rasmussen-Hall ML, Palm KM. Acceptance-based treatment for smoking cessation. Behav Ther 2004; 35 (04) 689-705
- 30 Westin V, Hayes SC, Andersson G. Is it the sound or your relationship to it? The role of acceptance in predicting tinnitus impact. Behav Res Ther 2008; 46 (12) 1259-1265
- 31 Muñoz K, McLeod H, Pitt C, Preston E, Shelton T, Twohig M. Recognizing emotional challenges of hearing loss. Hear J 2017; 70 (01) 34-37
- 32 Molander P, Hesser H, Weineland S. et al. Internet-based acceptance and commitment therapy for psychological distress experienced by people with hearing problems: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Cogn Behav Ther 2018; 47 (02) 169-184
- 33 Gabay G. Perceived control over health, communication and patient-physician trust. Patient Educ Couns 2015; 98 (12) 1550-1557
- 34 McGuire LC. Remembering what the doctor said: organization and adults' memory for medical information. Exp Aging Res 1996; 22 (04) 403-428