Hemiboronic Acid-Catalyzed Reduction of α,β-Unsaturated Ketones with Reagent-Controlled Chemoselectivity

Jason P. G. Rygus; Daniel B. Boateng; Dennis G. Hall

doi:10.1055/s-0040-1720074

Synlett, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Synlett 2023; 34(18): 2215-2219
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1720074

cluster

Modern Boron Chemistry: 60 Years of the Matteson Reaction

Hemiboronic Acid-Catalyzed Reduction of α,β-Unsaturated Ketones with Reagent-Controlled Chemoselectivity

Authors

Jason P. G. Rygus
Daniel B. Boateng
Dennis G. Hall∗

Abstract

Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik

Dedicated to Professor Donald Matteson in recognition of his seminal contributions to organoboron chemistry.

Abstract

The use of an air-stable cationic hemiboronic acid catalyst for the chemoselective reduction of enones is described. By changing the identity and stoichiometry of the silane reducing agent, either the conjugate reduction products or the fully reduced products can be obtained in high selectivity. In contrast to analogous reactions catalyzed by air- and moisture-sensitive borane catalysts, the hemiboronic acid catalyzed protocol can be performed under ambient conditions. Profiling studies revealed that global reduction proceeds via a rapid initial 1,4-addition, followed by ketone deoxygenation with a rate that is highly silane-dependent.

Key words

boronic acid catalysis - hemiboronic acids - reduction - deoxygenation - silanes

Volltext

Referenzen

References and Notes
1 Shenvi RA, O’Malley DP, Baran PS. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009; 42: 530
2 Clarke JJ, Basemann K, Romano N, Lee SJ, Gagné MR. Org. Lett. 2022; 24: 4135
3 Black WC, Bayly C, Belley M, Chan C.-C, Charleson S, Denis D, Gauthier JY, Gordon R, Guay D, Kargman S, Lau CK, Leblanc Y, Mancini J, Ouellet M, Percival D, Roy P, Skorey K, Tagari P, Vickers P, Wong E, Xu L, Prasit P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1996; 6: 725
4 Cheenpracha S, Karalai C, Ponglimanont C, Subhadhirasakul S, Tewtrakul S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006; 14: 1710
5 Puchalska P, Crawford PA. Cell Metab. 2017; 25: 262
6 Foley DJ, Waldmann H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022; 51: 4094
7 Nagai Y. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 1980; 12: 13
8 Larson GL, Fry JL. Org. React. (N. Y.) 2008; 71: 1
9 Rendler S, Oestreich M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007; 46: 498
10 Larson GL, Liberatore RJ. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2021; 25: 1719
11 Deutsch C, Krause N, Lipshutz BH. Chem. Rev. 2008; 108: 2916
12 Lipshutz BH, Chrisman W, Noson K, Papa P, Sclafani JA, Vivian RW, Keith JW. Tetrahedron 2000; 56: 2779
13 Jurkauskas V, Sadighi JP, Buchwald SL. Org. Lett. 2003; 5: 2417
14 Lipshutz BH, Servesko JM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003; 42: 4789
15 Rainka MP, Aye Y, Buchwald SL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004; 101: 5821
16 Otsuka H, Shirakawa E, Hayashi T. Chem. Commun. 2007; 1819
17 Keinan E, Greenspoon N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986; 108: 7314
18 Sumida Y, Yorimitsu H, Oshima K. J. Org. Chem. 2009; 74: 7986
19 Keinan E, Perez D. J. Org. Chem. 1987; 52: 2576
20 Magnus P, Waring MJ, Scott DA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000; 41: 9731
21 Ojima I, Kogure T. Organometallics 1982; 1: 1390
22 Kanazawa Y, Tsuchiya Y, Kobayashi K, Shiomi T, Itoh J.-i, Kukuchi M, Yamamoto T, Nishiyama H. Chem. Eur. J. 2006; 12: 63
23 Miller SP, Morken JP. Org. Lett. 2002; 4: 2743
24 Fang H, Oestreich M. Chem. Sci. 2020; 11: 12604
25 Parks DJ, Piers WE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996; 118: 9440
26 Mahdi T, Stephan DW. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 8511
27 Chandrasekhar S, Reddy CR, Babu BN. J. Org. Chem. 2002; 67: 9080
28 Bajracharya GB, Nogami T, Jin T, Matsuda K, Gevorgyan V, Yamamoto Y. Synthesis 2004; 308
29 Chadwick RC, Kardelis V, Lim P, Adronov A. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 79: 7728
30 Greb L, Oña-Burgos P, Kubas A, Falk FC, Breher F, Fink K, Paradies J. Dalton Trans. 2012; 41: 9056
31 Kim Y, Chang S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 218
32 Ren X, Han C, Feng X, Du H. Synlett 2017; 28: 2421
33 Zhan X.-Y, Zhang H, Dong Y, Yang J, He S, Shi Z.-C, Tang L, Wang J.-Y. J. Org. Chem. 2020; 85: 6578
34 Nicholson K, Langer T, Thomas SP. Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 2498
35 Li Y, de la Torre JA. M, Grabow K, Bentrup U, Junge K, Zhou S, Brückner A, Beller M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 11577
36 Hall DG. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019; 48: 3475
37 Rygus JP. G, Hall DG. Nat. Commun. 2023; 14: 2563
38 Zhuang C, Zhang W, Sheng C, Zhang W, Xing C, Miao Z. Chem. Rev. 2017; 117: 7762
39 Pesti J, Larson GL. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2016; 20: 1164
40 Pérez JM, Maquilón C, Ramón DJ, Baeza A. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2017; 6: 1440

41a 4-(3-Phenylpropanoyl)phenyl acrylate (3h); Typical Procedure Under air, a vial was charged with enone 2h (111 mg, 0.400 mmol), catalyst 1 (4.0 mg, 0.020 mmol, 5 mol%), Et₃SiH (80 μL, 0.50 mmol, 1.25 equiv), and HFIP (1.6 mL). The mixture was stirred at rt for 24 h, then concentrated by rotary evaporation. Purification by column chromatography [silica gel, hexane–EtOAc (gradient 30:1 to 20:1)] gave a viscous oil; yield: 92 mg (83%). FTIR (microscope): 3063 (w), 3028 (w), 2927 (w), 1743 (m), 1686 (m), 1599 (m), 1405 (m), 1204 (s), 1146 (s), 980 (m), 799 (w), 750 (w) cm^–1. ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 8.03 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.33–7.30 (m, 2 H), 7.27–7.21 (m, 5 H), 6.65 (dd, J = 17.4, 1.3 Hz, 1 H). 6.34 (dd, J = 17.4, 10.5 Hz, 1 H), 6.07 (dd, J = 10.4, 1.2 Hz, 1 H). 3.31 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2 H), 3.09 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2 H). ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 198.1, 164.1, 154.4, 141.3, 134.6, 133.4, 129.8, 128.7, 128.6, 127.7, 126.3, 121.9, 40.6, 30.2. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd for C₁₈H₁₆NaO₃: 303.0992; found: 303.0993.

Zusatzmaterial

Supporting Information (PDF)