CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 26(04): e519-e523
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1722160
Update Manuscript

Functional Changes of the Upper Esophageal Sphincter in Gastroesophageal Reflux

1   Department of Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto SP, Brazil
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction The upper esophageal sphincter (UES) is a muscular structure located at the transition from the pharynx to the esophagus, with the cricopharyngeal muscle as the most important component. During gastroesophageal reflux, the pressure in the UES elevates, which is apparently a protective mechanism to prevent esophagopharyngeal reflux and airway aspiration. In gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), there may be functional changes in the UES.

Objective The objective of the present review was to determine UES functional changes in GERD.

Data Synthesis In healthy individuals, gastroesophageal reflux causes an increase in the UES pressure. This response of the sphincter is at least partially impaired in patients with GERD. In the disease, the UES has a reduced length and decreased resting pressure. However, other publications found that in chronic gastroesophageal reflux the basal sphincter pressure increase, differences which may be consequent to the measurement method or to disease severity. The UES opening during swallowing has a smaller diameter, and the bolus transit time through the sphincter is longer.

Conclusion The UES of patients with GERD does not open as expected and the bolus flow through the sphincter is longer. This behavior may be associated with dysphagia, a frequent complaint in patients with GERD.



Publication History

Received: 13 November 2019

Accepted: 22 October 2020

Article published online:
28 July 2021

© 2021. Fundação Otorrinolaringologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • References

  • 1 Lang IM, Shaker R. Anatomy and physiology of the upper esophageal sphincter. Am J Med 1997; 103 (5A): 50S-55S
  • 2 Lang IM. Upper esophageal sphincter. GI Motility Online, Part 1: Oral cavity, pharynx and esophagus,. 2006
  • 3 Perera L, Kern M, Hofmann C. et al. Manometric evidence for a phonation-induced UES contractile reflex. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2008; 294 (04) G885-G891
  • 4 Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Dent J, Haeberle B, Hogan WJ, Arndorfer RC. Effect of sleep, spontaneous gastroesophageal reflux, and a meal on upper esophageal sphincter pressure in normal human volunteers. Gastroenterology 1987; 92 (02) 466-471
  • 5 Andreollo NA, Thompson DG, Kendall GPN, Earlam RJ. Functional relationships between cricopharyngeal sphincter and oesophageal body in response to graded intraluminal distension. Gut 1988; 29 (02) 161-166
  • 6 Andreollo NA, Thompson DG, Kendall GP, McIntyre AS, Earlam RJ. Motor responses of the upper esophageal sphincter and body to intraluminal acid. Braz J Med Biol Res 1989; 22 (01) 51-60
  • 7 Gerhardt DC, Shuck TJ, Bordeaux RA, Winship DH. Human upper esophageal sphincter. Response to volume, osmotic, and acid stimuli. Gastroenterology 1978; 75 (02) 268-274
  • 8 Bitnar P, Stovicek J, Andel R. et al. Leg raise increases pressure in lower and upper esophageal sphincter among patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2016; 20 (03) 518-524
  • 9 Gyawali CP, Kahrilas PJ, Savarino E. et al. Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus. Gut 2018; 67 (07) 1351-1362
  • 10 Vaezi MF, Sifrim D. Assessing old and new diagnostic test for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 2018; 154 (02) 289-301
  • 11 Richter JE. The many manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease: presentation, evaluation, and treatment. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2007; 36 (03) 577-599 , viii–ix
  • 12 Cook IJ, Dodds WJ, Dantas RO. et al. Opening mechanisms of the human upper esophageal sphincter. Am J Physiol 1989; 257 (5 Pt 1): G748-G759
  • 13 Torrico S, Kern M, Aslam M. et al. Upper esophageal sphincter function during gastroesophageal reflux events revisited. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2000; 279 (02) G262-G267
  • 14 Miller S, Ptok M, Jungheim M. Influence of acid swallows on the dynamics of the upper esophageal sphincter. Dysphagia 2020
  • 15 Kuribayashi S, Massey BT, Hafeezullah M. et al. Upper esophageal sphincter and gastroesophageal junction pressure changes act to prevent gastroesophageal and esophagopharyngeal reflux during apneic episodes in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 2010; 137 (04) 769-776
  • 16 Nadaleto BF, Herbella FAM, Pinna BR, Patti MG. Upper esophageal sphincter motility in gastroesophageal reflux disease in the light of the high-resolution manometry. Dis Esophagus 2017; 30 (04) 1-5
  • 17 Benjamin T, Zackria S, Lopez R, Richter J, Thota PN. Upper esophageal sphincter abnormalities and high-resolution esophageal manometry findings in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux. Scand J Gastroenterol 2017; 52 (08) 816-821
  • 18 Passaretti S, Mazzoleni G, Vailati C, Testoni PA. Oropharyngeal acid reflux and motility abnormalities of the proximal esophagus. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22 (40) 8991-8998
  • 19 Bognár L, Vereczkei A, Papp A, Jancsó G, Horváth ÖP. Gastroesophageal reflux disease might induce certain – supposedly adaptative – changes in the esophagus: a hipothesis. Dig Dis Sci 2018; 63 (10) 2529-2535
  • 20 Nativ-Zeltzer N, Rameau A, Kuhn MA, Kaufman M, Belafsky PC. The relationship between hiatal hernia and cricopharyngeus dysfunction. Dysphagia 2019; 34 (03) 391-396
  • 21 Mendell DA, Logemann JA. A retrospective analysis of the pharyngeal swallow in patients with a clinical diagnosis of GERD compared with normal controls: a pilot study. Dysphagia 2002; 17 (03) 220-226
  • 22 Cassiani RA, Mota GA, Dantas RO. Oral and pharyngeal bolus transit in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Esophagus 2015; 12 (04) 345-351
  • 23 Cassiani RA, Dantas RO. Oral and pharyngeal transit in functional heartburn. Arq Gastroenterol 2020; 57 (02) 150-153
  • 24 Kidambi T, Toto E, Ho N, Taft T, Hirano I. Temporal trends in the relative prevalence of dysphagia etiologies from 1999-2009. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18 (32) 4335-4341
  • 25 Triadafilopoulos G. Nonobstructive dysphagia in reflux esophagitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1989; 84 (06) 614-618
  • 26 Batista AO, Nascimento WV, Cassiani RA. et al. Prevalence of non-obstructive dysphagia in patients with heartburn and regurgitation. Clinics (São Paulo) 2020; 75: e1556
  • 27 Baredes S, Shah CS, Kaufman R. The frequency of cricopharyngeal dysfunction on videofluoroscopic swallowing studies in patients with dysphagia. Am J Otolaryngol 1997; 18 (03) 185-189
  • 28 Koidou I, Kollias N, Sdravou K, Groios G. Dysphagia: a short review of the current state. Educ Gerontol 2013; 39 (11) 812-817
  • 29 Kim HI, Hong SJ, Han JP. et al. Specific movement of esophagus during transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation in gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013; 19 (03) 332-337
  • 30 Alkan Z, Demir A, Yigit O. et al. Cricopharyngeal muscle electromyography findings in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 147 (02) 295-301
  • 31 Dantas RO, Aprile LRO. Esophageal striated muscle contractions in patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Dig Dis Sci 2002; 47 (11) 2586-2590
  • 32 Babaei A, Venu M, Naini SR. et al. Impaired upper esophageal sphincter reflexes in patients with supraesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 2015; 149 (06) 1381-1391
  • 33 Vardar R, Sweis R, Anggiansah A, Wong T, Fox MR. Upper esophageal sphincter and esophageal motility in patients with chronic cough and reflux: assessment by high-resolution manometry. Dis Esophagus 2013; 26 (03) 219-225
  • 34 Mei L, Dua A, Kern M. et al. Older age reduces upper esophageal sphincter and esophageal body responses to simulated slow and ultraslow reflux events and post-reflux residue. Gastroenterology 2018; 155 (03) 760-770.e1
  • 35 Lang IM, Medda BK, Shaker R. Effects of esophageal acidification on esophageal reflexes controlling the upper esophageal sphincter. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2019; 316 (01) G45-G54
  • 36 Kendall KA. Airway closure delay: the predominant pathophysiology in reflux-associated dysphagia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 160 (05) 885-890
  • 37 Shaker R. Reflex interation of pharynx, esophagus, and airways. . GI Motility Online, Part 1: Oral cavity, pharynx and esophagus, 2006
  • 38 Sato H, Ikarashi S, Terai S. A rare case involving the inability to belch. Intern Med 2019; 58 (07) 929-931
  • 39 Bastian RW, Smithson ML. Inability to belch and associated symptoms due to retrograde cricopharyngeal dysfunction: diagnosis and treatment. OTO Open 2019; 3 (01) X19834553
  • 40 Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Dent J, Wyman JB, Hogan WJ, Arndorfer RC. Upper esophageal sphincter function during belching. Gastroenterology 1986; 91 (01) 133-140
  • 41 Hunt R, Armstrong D, Katelaris P. et al; Review Team. World Gastroenterology Organisation global guidelines. GERD global perspective on gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 2017; 51 (06) 467-478
  • 42 Richter JE, Rubenstein JH. Presentation and epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 2018; 154 (02) 267-276
  • 43 Vakil NB, Traxler B, Levine D. Dysphagia in patients with erosive esophagitis: prevalence, severity, and response to proton pump inhibitor treatment. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2 (08) 665-668
  • 44 Dantas RO, Kern MK, Massey BT. et al. Effect of swallowed bolus variables on oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing. Am J Physiol 1990; 258 (5 Pt 1): G675-G681
  • 45 Katzka DA, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. Phenotipes of gastroesopageal reflux disease. Where Rome, Lyon, and Montreal meet. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18 (04) 767-776