Download PDF
Semin Plast Surg 2021; 35(01): 054-062
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1726102
Review Article

Failure in Lumbar Spinal Fusion and Current Management Modalities

Alex Cruz
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
Alexander E. Ropper
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
David S. Xu
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
Michael Bohl
3   Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
,
Edward M. Reece
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
4   Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
Sebastian J. Winocour
4   Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
Edward Buchanan
4   Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
5   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
,
Geoffrey Kaung
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
› Author Affiliations Funding Dr. Ropper receives consulting fees from Globus Medical and Stryker, but these fees have no conflict with this report.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Lumbar spinal fusion is a commonly performed procedure to stabilize the spine, and the frequency with which this operation is performed is increasing. Multiple factors are involved in achieving successful arthrodesis. Systemic factors include patient medical comorbidities—such as rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis—and smoking status. Surgical site factors include choice of bone graft material, number of fusion levels, location of fusion bed, adequate preparation of fusion site, and biomechanical properties of the fusion construct. Rates of successful fusion can vary from 65 to 100%, depending on the aforementioned factors. Diagnosis of pseudoarthrosis is confirmed by imaging studies, often a combination of static and dynamic radiographs and computed tomography. Once pseudoarthrosis is identified, patient factors should be optimized whenever possible and a surgical plan implemented to provide the best chance of successful revision arthrodesis with the least amount of surgical risk.

Keywords

lumbar spinal fusion - neurosurgery - spine surgery - pseudoarthrosis


Publication History

Article published online:
10 May 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Albee FH. Transplantation of a portion of the tibia into the spine for Pott's disease. J Am Med Assoc 2007; 460: 14-6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Rajaee SS, Bae HW, Kanim LE, Delamarter RB. Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine 2012; 37 (01) 67-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Burchardt H, Enneking WF. Transplantation of bone. Surg Clin North Am 1978; 58 (02) 403-427
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kalfas IH. Principles of bone healing. Neurosurg Focus 2001; 10 (04) E1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Khan SN, Cammisa Jr FP, Sandhu HS, Diwan AD, Girardi FP, Lane JM. The biology of bone grafting. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005; 13 (01) 77-86
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Berman D, Oren JH, Bendo J, Spivak J. The effect of smoking on spinal fusion. Int J Spine Surg 2017; 11 (04) 29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Daftari TK, Whitesides Jr TE, Heller JG, Goodrich AC, McCarey BE, Hutton WC. Nicotine on the revascularization of bone graft. An experimental study in rabbits. Spine 1994; 19 (08) 904-911
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Theiss SM, Boden SD, Hair G, Titus L, Morone MA, Ugbo J. The effect of nicotine on gene expression during spine fusion. Spine 2000; 25 (20) 2588-2594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Glassman SD, Anagnost SC, Parker A, Burke D, Johnson JR, Dimar JR. The effect of cigarette smoking and smoking cessation on spinal fusion. Spine 2000; 25 (20) 2608-2615
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Carlson BB, Burton DC, Jackson RS, Robinson S. Recidivism rates after smoking cessation before spinal fusion. Orthopedics 2016; 39 (02) e318-e322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kurd MF, Kreitz T, Schroeder G, Vaccaro AR. The role of multimodal analgesia in spine surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2017; 25 (04) 260-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kinsella J, Moffat AC, Patrick JA, Prentice JW, McArdle CS, Kenny GN. Ketorolac trometamol for postoperative analgesia after orthopaedic surgery. Br J Anaesth 1992; 69 (01) 19-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Li J, Ajiboye RM, Orden MH, Sharma A, Drysch A, Pourtaheri S. The effect of ketorolac on thoracolumbar posterolateral fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Spine Surg 2018; 31 (02) 65-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Pradhan BB, Tatsumi RL, Gallina J, Kuhns CA, Wang JC, Dawson EG. Ketorolac and spinal fusion: does the perioperative use of ketorolac really inhibit spinal fusion?. Spine 2008; 33 (19) 2079-2082
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Prolo DJ. Biology of bone fusion. Clin Neurosurg 1990; 36: 135-146
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Grabowski G, Cornett CA. Bone graft and bone graft substitutes in spine surgery: current concepts and controversies. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2013; 21 (01) 51-60
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ong KL, Villarraga ML, Lau E, Carreon LY, Kurtz SM, Glassman SD. Off-label use of bone morphogenetic proteins in the United States using administrative data. Spine 2010; 35 (19) 1794-1800
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Simmonds MC, Brown JV, Heirs MK. et al. Safety and effectiveness of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for spinal fusion: a meta-analysis of individual-participant data. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158 (12) 877-889
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Fu R, Selph S, McDonagh M. et al. Effectiveness and harms of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in spine fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158 (12) 890-902
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Bodalia PN, Balaji V, Kaila R, Wilson L. Effectiveness and safety of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for adults with lumbar spine pseudarthrosis following spinal fusion surgery: a systematic review. Bone Joint Res 2016; 5 (04) 145-152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, Weiner BK. A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: emerging safety concerns and lessons learned. Spine J 2011; 11 (06) 471-491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Carragee EJ, Chu G, Rohatgi R. et al. Cancer risk after use of recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2 for spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (17) 1537-1545
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Cahill KS, McCormick PC, Levi AD. A comprehensive assessment of the risk of bone morphogenetic protein use in spinal fusion surgery and postoperative cancer diagnosis. J Neurosurg Spine 2015; 23 (01) 86-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A. Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine 2002; 27 (11) 1131-1141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, Brower R, Montgomery DM, Kurz LT. 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine 1997; 22 (24) 2807-2812
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Matz PG, Meagher RJ, Lamer T. et al. Guideline summary review: an evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine J 2016; 16 (03) 439-448
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Santoni BG, Hynes RA, McGilvray KC. et al. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. Spine J 2009; 9 (05) 366-373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Tortolani PJ, Stroh DA. Cortical bone trajectory technique for posterior spinal instrumentation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2016; 24 (11) 755-761
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Cunningham BW, Sefter JC, Hu N, Kim SW, Bridwell KH, McAfee PC. Biomechanical comparison of iliac screws versus interbody femoral ring allograft on lumbosacral kinematics and sacral screw strain. Spine 2010; 35 (06) E198-E205
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 How NE, Street JT, Dvorak MF. et al. Pseudarthrosis in adult and pediatric spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of incidence, characteristics, and risk factors. Neurosurg Rev 2019; 42 (02) 319-336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Kaiser MG, Eck JC, Groff MW. et al. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 17: bone growth stimulators as an adjunct for lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2014; 21 (01) 133-139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg 2015; 1 (01) 2-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Ghogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler WE. et al. Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 2016; 374 (15) 1424-1434
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR. Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 2006; 6 (04) 435-443
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kwon B, Kim DH. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion: Indications, outcomes and complications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2016; 24 (02) 96-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Silvestre C, Mac-Thiong JM, Hilmi R, Roussouly P. Complications and morbidities of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lumbar interbody fusion in 179 patients. Asian Spine J 2012; 6 (02) 89-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Quillo-Olvera J, Lin GX, Jo HJ, Kim JS. Complications on minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion at L2-L5 levels: a review of the literature and surgical strategies. Ann Transl Med 2018; 6 (06) 101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Zdeblick TA. A prospective, randomized study of lumbar fusion. Preliminary results. Spine 1993; 18 (08) 983-991
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Christensen FB, Hansen ES, Eiskjaer SP. et al. Circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with Brantigan cage versus posterolateral fusion with titanium Cotrel–Dubousset instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study of 146 patients. Spine 2002; 27 (23) 2674-2683
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Chun DS, Baker KC, Hsu WK. Lumbar pseudarthrosis: a review of current diagnosis and treatment. Neurosurg Focus 2015; 39 (04) E10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Teng I, Han J, Phan K, Mobbs R. A meta-analysis comparing ALIF, PLIF, TLIF and LLIF. J Clin Neurosci 2017; 44: 11-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Kornblum MB, Fischgrund JS, Herkowitz HN, Abraham DA, Berkower DL, Ditkoff JS. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis. Spine 2004; 29 (07) 726-733 , discussion 733–734
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Carpenter CT, Dietz JW, Leung KY, Hanscom DA, Wagner TA. Repair of a pseudarthrosis of the lumbar spine. A functional outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78 (05) 712-720
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Choudhri TF, Mummaneni PV, Dhall SS. et al. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 4: radiographic assessment of fusion status. J Neurosurg Spine 2014; 21 (01) 23-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Brodsky AE, Kovalsky ES, Khalil MA. Correlation of radiologic assessment of lumbar spine fusions with surgical exploration. Spine 1991; 16 (6, Suppl): S261-S265
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar