J Pediatr Genet 2021; 10(03): 173-193
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731036
Review Article

Monogenic Syndromes with Congenital Heart Diseases in Newborns (Diagnostic Clues for Neonatologists): A Critical Analysis with Systematic Literature Review

1   Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, San Marco Hospital, Policlinico “G. Rodolico - San Marco” University Hospital, Catania, Italy
,
1   Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, San Marco Hospital, Policlinico “G. Rodolico - San Marco” University Hospital, Catania, Italy
,
Maria Giovanna Aguglia
1   Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, San Marco Hospital, Policlinico “G. Rodolico - San Marco” University Hospital, Catania, Italy
,
Janette Mailo
2   Neonatal Neurology and Perinatal Stroke Stollery, Children's Hospital, Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
,
Maria Grazia Longo
1   Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, San Marco Hospital, Policlinico “G. Rodolico - San Marco” University Hospital, Catania, Italy
,
Federica Natacci
3   Genetic Unit, Genetics Department, University of Milan, IRCCS Ca' Granda – Policlinico Hospital, Milan, Italy
,
Martino Ruggieri
4   Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Unit of Rare Diseases of the Nervous System in Childhood, Section of Pediatrics and Child Neuropsychiatry, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Congenital heart disease (CHD), the most common major congenital anomaly, is associated with a genetic syndrome (chromosomal anomalies, genomic disorders, or monogenic disease) in 30% of patients. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate if, in the neonatal setting, clinical clues that orient the diagnostic path can be identified. For this purpose, we revised the most frequent dysmorphic features described in newborns with CHD, comparing those associated with monogenic syndromes (MSG) with the ones reported in newborns with genomic disorders. For this systematic review according to PRISMA statement, we used PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, Scopus database, and search terms related to CHD and syndrome. We found a wide range of dysmorphisms (ocular region, ears, mouth, and/or palate and phalangeal anomalies) detected in more than half of MSGs were found to be associated with CHDs, but those anomalies are also described in genomic rearrangements syndromes with equal prevalence. These findings confirmed that etiological diagnosis in newborns is challenging, and only the prompt and expert recognition of features suggestive of genetic conditions can improve the selection of appropriate, cost-effective diagnostic tests. However, in general practice, it is crucial to recognize clues that can suggest the presence of a genetic syndrome, and neonatologists often have the unique opportunity to be the first to identify abnormalities in the neonate.

Authors' Contributions

R.F. conceived the concept of the review. V.G. wrote the draft manuscript. F.N. contributed to genetic part. J.M. edited the paper. M.R. approved the manuscript. M.G.A. and M.G.L. contributed to the completion of the manuscript.


Note

The authors declare that research was conducted ethically in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.




Publication History

Received: 11 November 2020

Accepted: 14 April 2021

Article published online:
10 July 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Jones KL, Adam MP. Evaluation and diagnosis of the dysmorphic infant. Clin Perinatol 2015; 42 (02) 243-261
  • 2 Marelli AJ, Mackie AS, Ionescu-Ittu R, Rahme E, Pilote L. Congenital heart disease in the general population: changing prevalence and age distribution. Circulation 2007; 115 (02) 163-172
  • 3 Digilio MC, Marino B. What is new in genetics of congenital heart defects?. Front Pediatr 2016; 4: 120
  • 4 Ko JM. Genetic Syndromes associated with Congenital Heart Disease. Korean Circ J 2015; 45 (05) 357-361
  • 5 Murad MH, Sultan S, Haffar S, Bazerbachi F. Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports. BMJ Evid Based Med 2018; 23 (02) 60-63
  • 6 Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G. et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ 2017; 358: j4008
  • 7 Beck A, Hudgins L. Congenital cardiac malformations in the neonate: isolated or syndromic. Neoreviews 2003; 4: e105-e110
  • 8 Mangili G, Garzoli E, Sadou Y. Feeding dysfunctions and failure to thrive in neonates with congenital heart diseases. Pediatr Med Chir 2018; 40 (01) 196
  • 9 Formigari R, Michielon G, Digilio MC. et al. Genetic syndromes and congenital heart defects: how is surgical management affected?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 35 (04) 606-614
  • 10 Synnes AR, Berry M, Jones H, Pendray M, Stewart S, Lee SK. Canadian Neonatal Network. Infants with congenital anomalies admitted to neonatal intensive care units. Am J Perinatol 2004; 21 (04) 199-207
  • 11 Borghesi A, Mencarelli MA, Memo L. et al; their respective Scientific Societies. Intersociety policy statement on the use of whole-exome sequencing in the critically ill newborn infant. Ital J Pediatr 2017; 43 (01) 100
  • 12 Cianci P, D'Ambra A, Memo L. A clinical and diagnostic approach to a newborn with multiple congenital malformations. Journal of Pediatric and Neonatal Individualized Medicine 2018; 7 (02) e070227
  • 13 Jones KL, Smith DW. 2006. Smith's Recognizable Patterns of Human Malformation. 6th ed.. Philadelphia, US: Elsevier-Saunders;
  • 14 Passos-Bueno MR, Ornelas CC, Fanganiello RD. Syndromes of the first and second pharyngeal arches: a review. Am J Med Genet A 2009; 149A (08) 1853-1859
  • 15 Twigg SR, Wilkie AOM. New insights into craniofacial malformations. Hum Mol Genet 2015; 24 (R1): R50-R59
  • 16 Solomon BD, Muenke M. When to suspect a genetic syndrome. Am Fam Physician 2012; 86 (09) 826-833