CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 26(03): e339-e347
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731368
Original Research

Drug-induced Sleep Endoscopy: Are there Predictors for Failure of Oral Appliance Treatment?

1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
2   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
3   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
,
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
,
2   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
,
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Funding No financial support received for the present research.

Abstract

Introduction In the literature, evidence is lacking on the predictive value of drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) for oral appliance treatment (OAT).

Objectives The aim of the present study is to evaluate whether DISE with concomitant mandibular advancement maneuver can predict failure of OAT.

Methods An observational retrospective study including patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who previously received OAT. Results of DISE were analyzed in a group with documented OAT failure (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] > 10 events/hour or < 50% reduction) and a group with OAT benefit (AHI <10 events/hour or > 50% reduction). The upper airway was assessed using the velum, oropharynx, tongue base, epiglottis (VOTE) classification. Additionally, a mandibular advancement maneuver, manually protruding the mandible by performing a jaw thrust, was performed to mimic the effect of OAT.

Results The present study included 50 patients with OAT failure and 20 patients with OAT benefit. A subgroup analysis of patients with OAT failure and an AHI < 30 events/hour included 26 patients. In the OAT failure group, 74% had a negative jaw thrust maneuver. In the subgroup with an AHI < 30 events/hour, 76.9% had a negative jaw thrust maneuver. In the OAT benefit group, 25% had a negative jaw thrust maneuver (p < 0.001).

Conclusions A negative jaw thrust maneuver during DISE can be a valuable predictor for OAT failure, independent of AHI. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy should be considered as a diagnostic evaluation tool before starting OAT.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Data on study subjects was collected and stored anonymously to protect personal information.


Manuscript Approval

All authors declare that they have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.


Availability of Data and Materials

The dataset is available on request from: c.veugen@antoniusziekenhuis.nl


Authors' Contributions

Drug-induced sleep endoscopy was performed by Copper M P.. Data collection and analysis was done by Sanders R. M. C. and Veugen C. C. A. F. M.. Veugen C. C. A. F. M. wrote the manuscript. Copper M P. and Stokroos R. J. provided scientific supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.




Publication History

Received: 12 July 2020

Accepted: 19 March 2021

Article published online:
26 October 2021

© 2021. Fundação Otorrinolaringologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • References

  • 1 American Academy of Sleep Medicine Task Force. Sleep-related breathing disorders in adults: recommendations for syndrome definition and measurement techniques in clinical research. The Report of an American Academy of Sleep Medicine Task Force. Sleep 1999; 22 (05) 667-689
  • 2 Vonk PE, Beelen AMEH, de Vries N. Towards a prediction model for drug-induced sleep endoscopy as selection tool for oral appliance treatment and positional therapy in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath 2018; 22 (04) 901-907
  • 3 Vroegop AVMT, Vanderveken OM, Dieltjens M. et al. Sleep endoscopy with simulation bite for prediction of oral appliance treatment outcome. J Sleep Res 2013; 22 (03) 348-355
  • 4 Aktas O, Erdur O, Cirik AA, Kayhan FT. The role of drug-induced sleep endoscopy in surgical planning for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 272 (08) 2039-2043
  • 5 Sullivan CE, Issa FG, Berthon-Jones M, Eves L. Reversal of obstructive sleep apnoea by continuous positive airway pressure applied through the nares. Lancet 1981; 1 (8225): 862-865
  • 6 Vanderveken OM, Vroegop AV, van de Heyning PH, Braem MJ. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy completed with a simulation bite approach for the prediction of the outcome of treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with mandibular repositioning appliances. Oper Tech Otolaryngol--Head Neck Surg 2011; 22 (02) 175-182
  • 7 Lindberg E, Berne C, Elmasry A, Hedner J, Janson C. CPAP treatment of a population-based sample--what are the benefits and the treatment compliance?. Sleep Med 2006; 7 (07) 553-560
  • 8 Ferguson KA, Cartwright R, Rogers R, Schmidt-Nowara W. Oral appliances for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea: a review. Sleep 2006; 29 (02) 244-262
  • 9 Sutherland K, Vanderveken OM, Tsuda H. et al. Oral appliance treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: an update. J Clin Sleep Med 2014; 10 (02) 215-227
  • 10 Marklund M, Stenlund H, Franklin KA. Mandibular advancement devices in 630 men and women with obstructive sleep apnea and snoring: tolerability and predictors of treatment success. Chest 2004; 125 (04) 1270-1278
  • 11 Croft CB, Pringle M. Sleep nasendoscopy: a technique of assessment in snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1991; 16 (05) 504-509
  • 12 Battagel JM, Johal A, Kotecha BT. Sleep nasendoscopy as a predictor of treatment success in snorers using mandibular advancement splints. J Laryngol Otol 2005; 119 (02) 106-112
  • 13 Eichler C, Sommer JU, Stuck BA, Hörmann K, Maurer JT. Does drug-induced sleep endoscopy change the treatment concept of patients with snoring and obstructive sleep apnea?. Sleep Breath 2013; 17 (01) 63-68
  • 14 Johal A, Battagel JM, Kotecha BT. Sleep nasendoscopy: a diagnostic tool for predicting treatment success with mandibular advancement splints in obstructive sleep apnoea. Eur J Orthod 2005; 27 (06) 607-614
  • 15 De Corso E, Bastanza G, Della Marca GC, Rizotto G, Marchese MR, Fiorita A, Sergi B, Meucci D, Di Nardo W, Paludetti G, Scarano E. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy as a selection tool for mandibular advancement therapy by oral device. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2015; 35: 426-432
  • 16 Huntley C, Cooper J, Stiles M, Grewal R, Boon M. Predicting success of oral appliance therapy in treating obstructive sleep apnea using drug-induced sleep endoscopy. J Clin Sleep Med 2018; 14 (08) 1333-1337
  • 17 Kent DT, Rogers Sr R, Soose RJ. Drug-Induced Sedation Endoscopy in the Evaluation of OSA Patients with Incomplete Oral Appliance Therapy Response. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 153 (02) 302-307
  • 18 Lechner M, Wilkins D, Kotecha B. A review on drug-induced sedation endoscopy – Technique, grading systems and controversies. Vol. 41. Sleep Medicine Reviews.. W.B. Saunders Ltd; 2018: 141-148
  • 19 Kezirian EJ, Hohenhorst W, de Vries N. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy: the VOTE classification. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 268 (08) 1233-1236
  • 20 Op de Beeck S, Dieltjens M, Verbruggen AE. et al. Phenotypic labelling using drug-induced sleep endoscopy improves patient selection for mandibular advancement device outcome: A prospective study. J Clin Sleep Med 2019; 15 (08) 1089-1099
  • 21 Tan HL, Gozal D, Ramirez HM, Bandla HPR, Kheirandish-Gozal L. Overnight polysomnography versus respiratory polygraphy in the diagnosis of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep (Basel) 2014; 37 (02) 255-260
  • 22 Kirsch DB. PRO: sliding into home: portable sleep testing is effective for diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med 2013; 9 (01) 5-7
  • 23 De Vito A, Carrasco Llatas M, Ravesloot MJ. et al. European position paper on drug-induced sleep endoscopy: 2017 Update. Clin Otolaryngol 2018; 43 (06) 1541-1552
  • 24 Carrasco-Llatas M, Zerpa-Zerpa V, Dalmau-Galofre J. Reliability of drug-induced sedation endoscopy: interobserver agreement. Sleep Breath 2017; 21 (01) 173-179
  • 25 Vroegop AVMT, Vanderveken OM, Wouters K. et al. Observer variation in drug-induced sleep endoscopy: experienced versus nonexperienced ear, nose, and throat surgeons. Sleep (Basel) 2013; 36 (06) 947-953
  • 26 Kezirian EJ, White DP, Malhotra A, Ma W, McCulloch CE, Goldberg AN. Interrater reliability of drug-induced sleep endoscopy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 136 (04) 393-397