Download PDF
Semin Reprod Med 2021; 39(05/06): 200-206
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732313
Review Article

Sperm Selection Technology in ART

Catherine Martin 
1   Salisbury Fertility Centre, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, United Kingdom
,
Emma Woodland
1   Salisbury Fertility Centre, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations Funding No financial support was received for this work.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is a commonly used in vitro fertilization technique. Selection of sperm for injection is currently done using subjective assessment of morphology, which may not accurately identify the best-quality sperm. Hyaluronic acid receptors on sperm plasma membranes are a marker of maturity, and sperms which are capable of binding immobilized hyaluronic acid in vitro are of higher quality. This can be used as an advanced sperm selection technique to choose sperm for ICSI, termed physiological ICSI (PICSI). Several studies reported improved fertility treatment outcomes when using PICSI compared with conventional ICSI; however, the majority of studies are underpowered. Recently, a large, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, known as the Hyaluronic Acid Binding Sperm Selection (HABSelect) trial, found a significant reduction in miscarriage rates with PICSI, but no significant effect on live birth rate. There are still many avenues through which PICSI may provide an advantage, subject to confirmation by future research, such as improved long-term health of offspring. Other advanced sperm selection techniques include intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection, magnetic-activated cell sorting, and Zeta potential sperm selection; however, the most recent Cochrane review concluded that there is currently insufficient evidence to ascertain whether these techniques improve clinical outcomes, such as live birth rates.

Keywords

sperm selection - hyaluronic acid - PICSI - IMSI - MACS - Zeta potential


Publication History

Article published online:
13 July 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 NICE. Fertility Problems: Assessment and Treatment. London: NICE; 2017
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Dunson DB, Baird DD, Colombo B. Increased infertility with age in men and women. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103 (01) 51-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 1992; 340 (8810): 17-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Boulet SL, Mehta A, Kissin DM, Warner L, Kawwass JF, Jamieson DJ. Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. JAMA 2015; 313 (03) 255-263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 WHO. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. 5th ed.. 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Li B, Ma Y, Huang J. et al. Probing the effect of human normal sperm morphology rate on cycle outcomes and assisted reproductive methods selection. PLoS One 2014; 9 (11) e113392
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, Swanson RJ, Matta JF, Oehninger S. Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1988; 49 (01) 112-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hammadeh ME, Stieber M, Haidl G, Schmidt W. Association between sperm cell chromatin condensation, morphology based on strict criteria, and fertilization, cleavage and pregnancy rates in an IVF program. Andrologia 1998; 30 (01) 29-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Fawcett DW, Anderson WA, Phillips DM. Morphogenetic factors influencing the shape of the sperm head. Dev Biol 1971; 26 (02) 220-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Zini A, Phillips S, Courchesne A. et al. Sperm head morphology is related to high deoxyribonucleic acid stainability assessed by sperm chromatin structure assay. Fertil Steril 2009; 91 (06) 2495-2500
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Celik-Ozenci C, Jakab A, Kovacs T. et al. Sperm selection for ICSI: shape properties do not predict the absence or presence of numerical chromosomal aberrations. Hum Reprod 2004; 19 (09) 2052-2059
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Zavaczki Z, Celik-Ozenci C, Ovari L. et al. Dimensional assessment of X-bearing and Y-bearing haploid and disomic human sperm with the use of fluorescence in situ hybridization and objective morphometry. Fertil Steril 2006; 85 (01) 121-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Sakkas D, Ramalingam M, Garrido N, Barratt CL. Sperm selection in natural conception: what can we learn from Mother Nature to improve assisted reproduction outcomes?. Hum Reprod Update 2015; 21 (06) 711-726
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ergur AR, Dokras A, Giraldo JL, Habana A, Kovanci E, Huszar G. Sperm maturity and treatment choice of in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection: diminished sperm HspA2 chaperone levels predict IVF failure. Fertil Steril 2002; 77 (05) 910-918
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Tian Y, Zhang F, Zhang X. et al. Depression of HspA2 in human testis is associated with spermatogenic impairment and fertilization rate in ICSI treatment for azoospermic individuals. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014; 31 (12) 1687-1693
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Huszar G, Ozenci CC, Cayli S, Zavaczki Z, Hansch E, Vigue L. Hyaluronic acid binding by human sperm indicates cellular maturity, viability, and unreacted acrosomal status. Fertil Steril 2003; 79 (Suppl. 03) 1616-1624
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Huszar G, Jakab A, Sakkas D. et al. Fertility testing and ICSI sperm selection by hyaluronic acid binding: clinical and genetic aspects. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 14 (05) 650-663
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Dandekar P, Aggeler J, Talbot P. Structure, distribution and composition of the extracellular matrix of human oocytes and cumulus masses. Hum Reprod 1992; 7 (03) 391-398
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Witt KD, Beresford L, Bhattacharya S. et al. Hyaluronic acid binding sperm selection for assisted reproduction treatment (HABSelect): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2016; 6 (10) e012609
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Parmegiani L, Cognigni GE, Bernardi S, Troilo E, Ciampaglia W, Filicori M. “Physiologic ICSI”: hyaluronic acid (HA) favors selection of spermatozoa without DNA fragmentation and with normal nucleus, resulting in improvement of embryo quality. Fertil Steril 2010; 93 (02) 598-604
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Rashki Ghaleno L, Rezazadeh Valojerdi M, Chehrazi M, Sahraneshin Samani F, Salman Yazdi R. Hyaluronic acid binding assay is highly sensitive to select human spermatozoa with good progressive motility, morphology, and nuclear maturity. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2016; 81 (03) 244-250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Jakab A, Sakkas D, Delpiano E. et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a novel selection method for sperm with normal frequency of chromosomal aneuploidies. Fertil Steril 2005; 84 (06) 1665-1673
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Parmegiani L, Cognigni GE, Bernardi S. et al. Comparison of two ready-to-use systems designed for sperm-hyaluronic acid binding selection before intracytoplasmic sperm injection: PICSI vs. Sperm Slow: a prospective, randomized trial. Fertil Steril 2012; 98 (03) 632-637
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Parmegiani L, Cognigni GE, Ciampaglia W, Pocognoli P, Marchi F, Filicori M. Efficiency of hyaluronic acid (HA) sperm selection. J Assist Reprod Genet 2010; 27 (01) 13-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Braude P, Bolton V, Moore S. Human gene expression first occurs between the four- and eight-cell stages of preimplantation development. Nature 1988; 332 (6163): 459-461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Rehman KS, Bukulmez O, Langley M. et al. Late stages of embryo progression are a much better predictor of clinical pregnancy than early cleavage in intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization cycles with blastocyst-stage transfer. Fertil Steril 2007; 87 (05) 1041-1052
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Castillo-Baso J, Garcia-Villafaña G, Santos-Haliscak R. et al. Embryo quality and reproductive outcomes of spermatozoa selected by physiologic-ICSI or conventional ICSI in patients with Kruger <4% and >4% normo-morphology. Fertil Steril 2011; 96: S159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Liu Y, Feenan K, Chapple V, Roberts P, Matson P. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection using hyaluronic acid or polyvinylpyrrolidone: a time-lapse sibling oocyte study. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2019; 22 (01) 39-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Worrilow KC, Eid S, Woodhouse D. et al. Use of hyaluronan in the selection of sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI): significant improvement in clinical outcomes--multicenter, double-blinded and randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2013; 28 (02) 306-314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Mokánszki A, Tóthné EV, Bodnár B. et al. Is sperm hyaluronic acid binding ability predictive for clinical success of intracytoplasmic sperm injection: PICSI vs. ICSI?. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2014; 60 (06) 348-354
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Majumdar G, Majumdar A. A prospective randomized study to evaluate the effect of hyaluronic acid sperm selection on the intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome of patients with unexplained infertility having normal semen parameters. J Assist Reprod Genet 2013; 30 (11) 1471-1475
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 McDowell S, Kroon B, Ford E, Hook Y, Glujovsky D, Yazdani A. Advanced sperm selection techniques for assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (10) CD010461
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Avalos-Durán G, Cañedo-Del Ángel AME, Rivero-Murillo J, Zambrano-Guerrero JE, Carballo-Mondragón E, Checa-Vizcaíno MÁ. Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. conventional ICSI in couples with male factor: a systematic review. JBRA Assist Reprod 2018; 22 (02) 139-147
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Beck-Fruchter R, Shalev E, Weiss A. Clinical benefit using sperm hyaluronic acid binding technique in ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2016; 32 (03) 286-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Miller D, Pavitt S, Sharma V. et al. Physiological, hyaluronan-selected intracytoplasmic sperm injection for infertility treatment (HABSelect): a parallel, two-group, randomised trial. Lancet 2019; 393 (10170): 416-422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Kirkman-Brown J, Pavitt S, Khalaf Y. et al. Sperm selection for assisted reproduction by prior hyaluronan binding: the HABSelect RCT. Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation 2019; 6: 1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Lepine S, McDowell S, Searle LM, Kroon B, Glujovsky D, Yazdani A. Advanced sperm selection techniques for assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 7: CD010461
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Huszar G, Ozkavukcu S, Jakab A, Celik-Ozenci C, Sati GL, Cayli S. Hyaluronic acid binding ability of human sperm reflects cellular maturity and fertilizing potential: selection of sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 18 (03) 260-267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18 (05) 485-503
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Janecka M, Mill J, Basson MA. et al. Advanced paternal age effects in neurodevelopmental disorders-review of potential underlying mechanisms. Transl Psychiatry 2017; 7 (01) e1019-e1019
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Teixeira DM, Hadyme Miyague A, Barbosa MAP. et al. Regular (ICSI) versus ultra-high magnification (IMSI) sperm selection for assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 2: CD010167
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F. et al. Pregnancy rates are higher with intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection than with conventional intracytoplasmic injection. Fertil Steril 2003; 80 (06) 1413-1419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Teixeira DM, Barbosa MAP, Ferriani RA. et al. Regular (ICSI) versus ultra-high magnification (IMSI) sperm selection for assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (07) CD010167
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Gil M, Sar-Shalom V, Melendez Sivira Y, Carreras R, Checa MA. Sperm selection using magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 2013; 30 (04) 479-485
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Romany L, Garrido N, Motato Y, Aparicio B, Remohí J, Meseguer M. Removal of annexin V-positive sperm cells for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in ovum donation cycles does not improve reproductive outcome: a controlled and randomized trial in unselected males. Fertil Steril 2014; 102 (06) 1567-75.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Ziarati N, Tavalaee M, Bahadorani M, Nasr Esfahani MH. Clinical outcomes of magnetic activated sperm sorting in infertile men candidate for ICSI. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2019; 22 (02) 118-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Troya J, Zorrilla I. Annexin V-MACS in infertile couples as method for separation of sperm without DNA fragmentation. JBRA Assist Reprod 2015; 19 (02) 66-69
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Hasanen E, Elqusi K, ElTanbouly S. et al. PICSI vs. MACS for abnormal sperm DNA fragmentation ICSI cases: a prospective randomized trial. J Assist Reprod Genet 2020; 37 (10) 2605-2613
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Nasr Esfahani MH, Deemeh MR, Tavalaee M, Sekhavati MH, Gourabi H. Zeta sperm selection improves pregnancy rate and alters sex ratio in male factor infertility patients: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Int J Fertil Steril 2016; 10 (02) 253-260
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Pérez-Crespo M, Pintado B, Gutiérrez-Adán A. Scrotal heat stress effects on sperm viability, sperm DNA integrity, and the offspring sex ratio in mice. Mol Reprod Dev 2008; 75 (01) 40-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar