Download PDF
J Am Acad Audiol 2022; 33(01): 014-022
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1733965
Research Article

Factors Influencing the Purchase Rate of Cartilage Conduction Hearing Aids

Tadashi Nishimura
1   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck surgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
,
Hiroshi Hosoi
2   The Institute of MBT (Medicine-Based Town), Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
,
Tomoko Sugiuchi
3   Sugiuchi Clinic, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan
,
Nozomu Matsumoto
4   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
,
Takanori Nishiyama
5   Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
,
Takano Kenichi
6   Department of Otolaryngology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan
,
Satofumi Sugimoto
7   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Japan
,
Hiroaki Yazama
8   Division of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan
,
Takeshi Sato
9   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
,
Masahiro Komori
10   Department of Otolaryngology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku-shi, Kochi, Japan
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Innovated hearing aids (HAs), termed cartilage conduction hearing aids (CC-HAs), show good performance in patients with closed ears and continuous otorrhea. However, factors other than the ear condition that influence the purchase rate of CC-HAs remain unclear.

Purpose To identify the factors that influence the purchase rate of CC-HAs.

Research Design A correlational study.

Study Sample A total of 249 patients were enrolled.

Data Collection and Analysis The patients' demographics, clinical characteristics, outcomes, and CC-HA transducer types were compared. The data were analyzed for six groups classified based on the ear condition.

Results In the unilateral closed-ear group, the purchase cases were significantly younger than the nonpurchase cases (p < 0.05). Regarding the outcomes in the bilateral closed-ear group, the purchase cases showed significantly better-aided thresholds at 0.25 and 0.5 kHz than the nonpurchase cases. No significant differences in the functional gains and speech recognition scores were found between purchase and nonpurchase cases in all six groups. Regarding the transducer type, the continued-use rate of the simple transducer type was significantly lower in the bilateral chronic continuous otorrhea, bilateral open, and unilateral open groups.

Conclusion In the closed ears, no remarkable negative factors were found. Transducer type had a significant influence on the continued-use rate in the nonclosed ears including the ears with chronic continuous otorrhea, although the purchase rate of CC-HAs in the bilateral chronic continuous otorrhea group was comparable to the closed ears.

Keywords

aural atresia - bone conduction - cartilage conduction - continuous otorrhea - hearing aid

Disclaimer

Any mention of a product, service, or procedure in the Journal of the American Academy of Audiology does not constitute an endorsement of the product, service, or procedure by the American Academy of Audiology.




Publication History

Received: 25 March 2021

Accepted: 01 July 2021

Article published online:
06 May 2022

© 2022. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Hosoi H, Nishimura T, Shimokura R, Kitahara T. Cartilage conduction as the third pathway for sound transmission. Auris Nasus Larynx 2019; 46 (02) 151-159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Nishimura T, Hosoi H, Saito O. et al. Is cartilage conduction classified into air or bone conduction?. Laryngoscope 2014; 124 (05) 1214-1219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Nishimura T, Hosoi H, Saito O. et al. Cartilage conduction is characterized by vibrations of the cartilaginous portion of the ear canal. PLoS One 2015; 10 (03) e0120135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Nishimura T, Hosoi H, Saito O. et al. Effect of fixation place on airborne sound in cartilage conduction. J Acoust Soc Am 2020; a; 148 (02) 469
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Shimokura R, Hosoi H, Nishimura T, Yamanaka T, Levitt H. Cartilage conduction hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2014; 135 (04) 1959-1966
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hosoi H, Yanai S, Nishimura T. et al. Development of cartilage conduction hearing aid. Arch Mat Sci Eng 2010; 42 (02) 104-110
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Nishimura T, Hosoi H, Saito O. et al. Benefit of a new hearing device utilizing cartilage conduction. Auris Nasus Larynx 2013; 40 (05) 440-446
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Shimokura R, Hosoi H, Iwakura T. et al. Development of monaural and binaural behind-the-ear cartilage conduction hearing aids. Appl Acoust 2013; 74: 1234-1240
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lo JF, Tsang WS, Yu JY, Ho OY, Ku PK, Tong MC. Contemporary hearing rehabilitation options in patients with aural atresia. BioMed Res Int 2014; 2014: 761579
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Nishiyama T, Oishi N, Ogawa K. Who are good adult candidates for cartilage conduction hearing aids?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 278 (06) 1789-1798
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Nishiyama T, Oishi N, Ogawa K. Efficacy of cartilage conduction hearing aids in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 142 (11) 110628
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sakamoto Y, Shimada A, Nakano S. et al. Effects of FM system fitted into the normal hearing ear or cartilage conduction hearing aid fitted into the affected ear on speech-in-noise recognition in Japanese children with unilateral congenital aural atresia. J Med Invest 2020; 67 (1.2): 131-138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Nishimura T, Hosoi H, Sugiuchi T. et al. Cartilage conduction hearing aid fitting in clinical practice. J Am Acad Audiol 2021; in press
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Kodera K, Hosoi H, Okamoto M. et al. Guidelines for the evaluation of hearing aid fitting (2010). Auris Nasus Larynx 2016; 43 (03) 217-228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Cañete OM, Purdy SC, Brown CRS, Neeff M, Thorne PR. Behavioural performance and self-report measures in children with unilateral hearing loss due to congenital aural atresia. Auris Nasus Larynx 2021; 48 (01) 65-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Jensen DR, Grames LM, Lieu JE. Effects of aural atresia on speech development and learning: retrospective analysis from a multidisciplinary craniofacial clinic. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 139 (08) 797-802
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Bagatto M, Moodie S, Brown C. et al. Prescribing and verifying hearing aids applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: protocols and outcomes from the Ontario Infant Hearing Program. J Am Acad Audiol 2016; 27 (03) 188-203
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Nishimura T, Hosoi H, Saito O, Shimokura R, Yamanaka T, Kitahara T. Cartilage conduction hearing aids for severe conduction hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 2018; 39 (01) 65-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW. The bone-anchored hearing aid compared with conventional hearing aids. Audiologic results and the patients' opinions. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1995; 28 (01) 73-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Nishimura T, Hosoi H, Saito O, Shimokura R, Yamanaka T, Kitahara T. Sound localisation ability using cartilage conduction hearing aids in bilateral aural atresia. Int J Audiol 2020; b; 59 (12) 891-896
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 O'Brien A, Keidser G, Yeend I, Hartley L, Dillon H. Validity and reliability of in-situ air conduction thresholds measured through hearing aids coupled to closed and open instant-fit tips. Int J Audiol 2010; 49 (12) 868-876
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar