PDF herunterladen
Semin Reprod Med 2021; 39(05/06): 194-199
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1736261
Review Article

Sperm DNA Fragmentation

Stamatios Karavolos 
1   Department of Gynaecology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Stott Lane, Manchester, United Kingdom
› Institutsangaben Funding There are no funders to report for this submission.
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Sperm DNA fragmentation refers to the accumulation of adducts as well as single- or double-strand DNA breaks and reflects the sperm DNA quality. Current data suggest that there are differences in sperm DNA quality among individuals with high or low fertility, and this observation has led to the idea that testing sperm DNA fragmentation could be a useful test of male fertility. However, sperm DNA fragmentation has become one of the most frequently debated topics in reproductive medicine, as there is no agreement about the optimal way to test for DNA fragmentation, the clinically significant level of sperm DNA fragmentation, as well as the best therapeutic options for infertile men. This article presents current evidence related to sperm DNA fragmentation and its role in managing male infertility.

Keywords

infertility - male - sperm DNA fragmentation


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
18. Oktober 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Hotchkiss R. General considerations. In: Fertility in Men. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1944: 1
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Niederberger C, Pellicer A, Cohen J. et al. Forty years of IVF. Fertil Steril 2018; 110 (02) 185-324.e5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lewis SE, Agbaje I, Alvarez J. Sperm DNA tests as useful adjuncts to semen analysis. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2008; 54 (03) 111-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lewis SE, John Aitken R, Conner SJ. et al. The impact of sperm DNA damage in assisted conception and beyond: recent advances in diagnosis and treatment. Reprod Biomed Online 2013; 27 (04) 325-337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Aitken RJ. DNA damage in human spermatozoa; important contributor to mutagenesis in the offspring. Transl Androl Urol 2017; 6 (Suppl. 04) S761-S764
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Simon L, Aston KI, Emery BR, Hotaling J, Carrell DT. Sperm DNA damage output parameters measured by the alkaline Comet assay and their importance. Andrologia 2017;49(02):
    Google Scholar
  • 7 McQueen DB, Zhang J, Robins JC. Sperm DNA fragmentation and recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2019; 112 (01) 54-60.e3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Agarwal A, Nallella KP, Allamaneni SS, Said TM. Role of antioxidants in treatment of male infertility: an overview of the literature. Reprod Biomed Online 2004; 8 (06) 616-627
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Warren JS, Johnson KJ, Ward PA. Oxygen radicals in cell injury and cell death. Pathol Immunopathol Res 1987; 6 (5-6): 301-315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sun JG, Jurisicova A, Casper RF. Detection of deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation in human sperm: correlation with fertilization in vitro. Biol Reprod 1997; 56 (03) 602-607
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Aitken RJ, Krausz C. Oxidative stress, DNA damage and the Y chromosome. Reproduction 2001; 122 (04) 497-506
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Williams H, Martins da Silva S. Semen analysis and sperm function tests. In: Stewart JA. ed. Subfertility, Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2019: 48-54
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Sakkas D, Mariethoz E, St John JC. Abnormal sperm parameters in humans are indicative of an abortive apoptotic mechanism linked to the Fas-mediated pathway. Exp Cell Res 1999; 251 (02) 350-355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Simon L, Emery BR, Carrell DT. Review: diagnosis and impact of sperm DNA alterations in assisted reproduction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 44: 38-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hsu PC, Chen IY, Pan CH. et al. Sperm DNA damage correlates with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons biomarker in coke-oven workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2006; 79 (05) 349-356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Migliore L, Naccarati A, Zanello A, Scarpato R, Bramanti L, Mariani M. Assessment of sperm DNA integrity in workers exposed to styrene. Hum Reprod 2002; 17 (11) 2912-2918
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hales BF, Barton TS, Robaire B. Impact of paternal exposure to chemotherapy on offspring in the rat. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2005; 34 (34) 28-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Anderson D, Schmid TE, Baumgartner A, Cemeli-Carratala E, Brinkworth MH, Wood JM. Oestrogenic compounds and oxidative stress (in human sperm and lymphocytes in the Comet assay). Mutat Res 2003; 544 (2-3): 173-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Spanò M, Toft G, Hagmar L. et al; INUENDO. Exposure to PCB and p, p′-DDE in European and Inuit populations: impact on human sperm chromatin integrity. Hum Reprod 2005; 20 (12) 3488-3499
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Evenson DP, Wixon R. Environmental toxicants cause sperm DNA fragmentation as detected by the Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA). Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2005; 207 (02, Suppl): 532-537
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Aitken RJ, Buckingham DW, Brindle J, Gomez E, Baker HW, Irvine DS. Analysis of sperm movement in relation to the oxidative stress created by leukocytes in washed sperm preparations and seminal plasma. Hum Reprod 1995; 10 (08) 2061-2071
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Fernández JL, Muriel L, Rivero MT, Goyanes V, Vazquez R, Alvarez JG. The sperm chromatin dispersion test: a simple method for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation. J Androl 2003; 24 (01) 59-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Evenson DP, Tritle D. SCSA is a direct measure of sperm DNA fragmentation. Fertil Steril 2004; 82 (Suppl. 02) S174-S175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Sailer BL, Jost LK, Evenson DP. Mammalian sperm DNA susceptibility to in situ denaturation associated with the presence of DNA strand breaks as measured by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase assay. J Androl 1995; 16 (01) 80-87
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Cho CL, Agarwal A, Majzoub A, Esteves SC. The correct interpretation of sperm DNA fragmentation test. Transl Androl Urol 2017; 6 (Suppl. 04) S621-S623
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Simon L, Carrell DT. Sperm DNA damage measured by comet assay. Methods Mol Biol 2013; 927: 137-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Collins AR. The comet assay for DNA damage and repair: principles, applications, and limitations. Mol Biotechnol 2004; 26 (03) 249-261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ribas-Maynou J, García-Peiró A, Abad C, Amengual MJ, Navarro J, Benet J. Alkaline and neutral Comet assay profiles of sperm DNA damage in clinical groups. Hum Reprod 2012; 27 (03) 652-658
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Ribas-Maynou J, García-Peiró A, Fernández-Encinas A. et al. Comprehensive analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation by five different assays: TUNEL assay, SCSA, SCD test and alkaline and neutral Comet assay. Andrology 2013; 1 (05) 715-722
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Casanovas A, Ribas-Maynou J, Lara-Cerrillo S. et al. Double-stranded sperm DNA damage is a cause of delay in embryo development and can impair implantation rates. Fertil Steril 2019; 111 (04) 699-707.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Santi D, Spaggiari G, Simoni M. Sperm DNA fragmentation index as a promising predictive tool for male infertility diagnosis and treatment management - meta-analyses. Reprod Biomed Online 2018; 37 (03) 315-326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Høst E, Lindenberg S, Smidt-Jensen S. DNA strand breaks in human spermatozoa: correlation with fertilization in vitro in oligozoospermic men and in men with unexplained infertility. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79 (03) 189-193
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Saleh RA, Agarwal A, Nelson DR. et al. Increased sperm nuclear DNA damage in normozoospermic infertile men: a prospective study. Fertil Steril 2002; 78 (02) 313-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Duran EH, Morshedi M, Taylor S, Oehninger S. Sperm DNA quality predicts intrauterine insemination outcome: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod 2002; 17 (12) 3122-3128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Bungum M, Humaidan P, Axmon A. et al. Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome. Hum Reprod 2007; 22 (01) 174-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Yang XY, Zhang Y, Sun XP. et al. Sperm chromatin structure assay predicts the outcome of intrauterine insemination. [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2011; 17 (11) 977-983
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Chen Q, Zhao JY, Xue X, Zhu GX. The association between sperm DNA fragmentation and reproductive outcomes following intrauterine insemination, a meta analysis. Reprod Toxicol 2019; 86: 50-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Cissen M, Wely MV, Scholten I. et al. Measuring sperm DNA fragmentation and clinical outcomes of medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11 (11) e0165125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Evenson D, Wixon R. Meta-analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation using the sperm chromatin structure assay. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 12 (04) 466-472
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Zhang Z, Zhu L, Jiang H, Chen H, Chen Y, Dai Y. Sperm DNA fragmentation index and pregnancy outcome after IVF or ICSI: a meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015; 32 (01) 17-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Li Z, Wang L, Cai J, Huang H. Correlation of sperm DNA damage with IVF and ICSI outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 2006; 23 (9-10): 367-376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Collins JA, Barnhart KT, Schlegel PN. Do sperm DNA integrity tests predict pregnancy with in vitro fertilization?. Fertil Steril 2008; 89 (04) 823-831
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Zhao J, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Li Y. Whether sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation has an effect on pregnancy and miscarriage after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2014; 102 (04) 998-1005.e8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Osman A, Alsomait H, Seshadri S, El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on live birth rate after IVF or ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2015; 30 (02) 120-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Zini A, Boman JM, Belzile E, Ciampi A. Sperm DNA damage is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy loss after IVF and ICSI: systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2008; 23 (12) 2663-2668
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Robinson L, Gallos ID, Conner SJ. et al. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on miscarriage rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2012; 27 (10) 2908-2917
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Pacey AA. Environmental and lifestyle factors associated with sperm DNA damage. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2010; 13 (04) 189-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Salas-Huetos A, Rosique-Esteban N, Becerra-Tomás N, Vizmanos B, Bulló M, Salas-Salvadó J. The effect of nutrients and dietary supplements on sperm quality parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Adv Nutr 2018; 9 (06) 833-848
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Smits RM, Mackenzie-Proctor R, Yazdani A, Stankiewicz MT, Jordan V, Showell MG. Antioxidants for male subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 3: CD007411
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Barratt CLR, Björndahl L, De Jonge CJ. et al. The diagnosis of male infertility: an analysis of the evidence to support the development of global WHO guidance-challenges and future research opportunities. Hum Reprod Update 2017; 23 (06) 660-680
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile male: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2015; 103 (03) e18-e25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Moskovtsev SI, Jarvi K, Mullen JB, Cadesky KI, Hannam T, Lo KC. Testicular spermatozoa have statistically significantly lower DNA damage compared with ejaculated spermatozoa in patients with unsuccessful oral antioxidant treatment. Fertil Steril 2010; 93 (04) 1142-1146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Xie P, Keating D, Parrella A. et al. Sperm genomic integrity by TUNEL varies throughout the male genital tract. J Urol 2020; 203 (04) 802-808
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Esteves SC, Roque M, Bradley CK, Garrido N. Reproductive outcomes of testicular versus ejaculated sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection among men with high levels of DNA fragmentation in semen: systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2017; 108 (03) 456-467.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar