Optical diagnosis of malignant colorectal polyps: is it feasible?

Background and study aims: As colorectal cancer screening programs are being implemented worldwide, an increasing number of early (T1) cancers are being diagnosed. These cancers should be recognized during colonoscopy because they require a specific therapeutic approach. Several studies have shown that Asian experts can reliably recognize T1 cancers during colonoscopy. In daily practice, however, accurate endoscopic diagnosis of T1 cancers still seems challenging. We evaluated the performance of optical diagnosis of T1 cancers by European colonoscopy experts, general gastroenterologists and gastrointestinal fellows.

Patients and methods: We collected endoscopic images of 43 colonic lesions: 19 T1 cancers (excluding intramucosal carcinoma) and 24 benign polyps ranging from 7 mm to 30 mm in size. Seven colonoscopy experts, 7 general gastroenterologists, and 14 gastrointestinal fellows assessed these images. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) and their 95 % confidence intervals for optical diagnosis of T1 cancers.

Results: Overall sensitivity for correct diagnosis of T1 cancers was 60 % (95 % CI;45 – 72). Sensitivity was highest for experts (67 %: 95 %CI; 48 – 81), when compared to general gastroenterologists (53 %: 95 %CI; 37 – 69) and gastrointestinal fellows (59 %: 95 %CI;45 – 72). The overall NPV was 75 % (95 %CI;60 – 86); NPV was lowest for general gastroenterologists 72 % (95 %CI;57 – 83) vs 78 % (95 %CI;63 – 89) for experts and 75 % (95 %CI;60 – 85) for gastrointestinal fellows.

Conclusions: In this image-based study, both sensitivity for the optical diagnosis of a T1 cancer and NPV for excluding a T1 cancer were insufficient. Experts performed best with a sensitivity of 67 % and a NPV of 78 %, while the performance of fellows in the last year of training was comparable to that of experts. Our study indicates that training for endoscopic diagnosis for T1 cancers is urgently needed to ensure optimal clinical practice for treatment of these lesions.

• References

• 1 Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 1996; 1472-1477
• 2 Reggiani-Bonetti L, Di Gregorio C, Pedroni M et al. Incidence trend of malignant polyps through the data of a specialized colorectal cancer registry: clinical features and effect of screening. Scand J Gastroenterol 2013; 48: 1294-1301
• 3 Nivatvongs S. Surgical management of malignant colorectal polyps. Surg Clin North Am 2002; 82: 959-966
• 4 Hassan C, Zullo A, Winn S et al. The colorectal malignant polyp: Scoping a dilemma. Dig Liver Dis 2007; 39: 92-100
• 5 Gill MD, Rutter MD, Holtham SJ. Management and short-term outcome of malignant colorectal polyps in the north of England. Color Dis 2013; 15: 169-176
• 6 Watanabe T, Itabashi M, Shimada Y et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2010 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2012; 17: 1-29
• 7 Hayashi N, Tanaka S, Hewett DG et al. Endoscopic prediction of deep submucosal invasive carcinoma: validation of the Narrow-Band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification. Gastrointest Endosc. Elsevier Ltd 2013; 78: 625-632
• 8 Kobayashi N, Saito Y, Sano Y et al. Determining the treatment strategy for colorectal neoplastic lesions: Endoscopic assessment or the non-lifting sign for diagnosing invasion depth?. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 701-705
• 9 Tanaka S, Oka S, Hirata M et al. Pit pattern diagnosis for colorectal neoplasia using narrow band imaging magnification. Digestive Endoscopy 2006; 18: S52-S56
• 10 Tanaka S, Hayashi N, Oka S et al. Endoscopic assessment of colorectal cancer with superficial or deep submucosal invasion using magnifying colonoscopy. Clin Endosc 2013; 46: 138-146
• 11 Fu KI, Sano Y, Kato S et al. Chromoendoscopy using indigo carmine dye spraying with magnifying observation is the most reliable method for differential diagnosis between non-neoplastic and neoplastic colorectal lesions: A prospective study. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 1089-1093
• 12 Kudo S, Tamura S, Nakajima T et al. Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 8-14
• 13 Wada Y, ei Kudo S, Kashida H et al. Diagnosis of colorectal lesions with the magnifying narrow-band imaging system. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 522-531
• 14 Zafar A, Mustafa M, Chapman M. Colorectal polyps: When should we tattoo?. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 2012; 26: 3264-3266
• 15 Stegeman I, van Doorn SC, Mallant-Hent RC et al. The accuracy of polyp assessment during colonoscopy in FIT-screening is not acceptable on a routine basis. Endosc Int Open 2014; 3
• 16 Lambert R. Endoscopic Classification Review, Review EC. Update on the Paris Classification of Superficial Neoplastic Lesions in the Digestive Tract. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 570-578
• 17 Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 2000; 47: 251-255
• 18 Leisenring W, Pepe MS, Longton G. A marginal regression modelling framework for evaluating medical diagnostic tests. Stat Med 1997; 16: 1263-1281
• 19 Hewett DG, Kaltenbach T, Sano Y et al. Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 599-607
• 20 Hazewinkel Y, López-cerón M, East JE et al. Endoscopic features of sessile serrated adenomas : validation by international experts using high-resolution white-light endoscopy and narrow-band imaging. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 916-924
• 21 Bouwens MWE, de Ridder R, Masclee AAM et al. Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps using high-definition i-scan: An educational experience. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 4334-4343
• 22 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Online Learning Center. Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps (OLV004). http://asge.extendmed.com
• 23 Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y et al. A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 1217-1225