Open Access
Endosc Int Open 2016; 04(08): E832-E837
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-110095
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Analysis of microvascular density in early gastric carcinoma using magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging

Autoren

  • Masashi Kawamura

    1   Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Hospital, Miyagi, Japan
  • Hiroshi Naganuma

    2   Department of Pathology, Sendai City Hospital, Miyagi, Japan
  • Rie Shibuya

    2   Department of Pathology, Sendai City Hospital, Miyagi, Japan
  • Tatsuya Kikuchi

    1   Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Hospital, Miyagi, Japan
  • Yoshitaka Sakai

    1   Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Hospital, Miyagi, Japan
  • Futoshi Nagasaki

    1   Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Hospital, Miyagi, Japan
  • Eiki Nomura

    1   Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Hospital, Miyagi, Japan
  • Noriaki Suzuki

    1   Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Hospital, Miyagi, Japan
  • Eri Saito

    1   Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Hospital, Miyagi, Japan
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

submitted23. Dezember 2015

accepted after revision17. Mai 2016

Publikationsdatum:
09. August 2016 (online)

Background and study aims: Intramucosal vascular density differs between differentiated and undifferentiated type gastric carcinomas. This study aimed to evaluate the microvascular density characteristics of these two types of carcinoma using magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI).

Patients and methods: In total, 42 differentiated and 10 undifferentiated types were evaluated. The microvessels observed using ME-NBI were extracted from stored still images and the microvascular density in the two carcinoma types was analyzed. Histological vascular density in resected specimens was also evaluated using CD34 immunostaining.

Results: There were significant differences between the microvascular density in the differentiated and undifferentiated types of carcinoma (10.02 ± 4.72 % vs 4.02 ± 0.40 %; P < 0.001) using ME-NBI. Vascular density assessed histologically also differed significantly between differentiated and undifferentiated types in both the whole mucosal (5.81 ± 3.17 % vs 3.25 ± 1.21 %) and the superficial mucosal layers (0 – 100 μm) (6.38 ± 3.73 % vs 3.66 ± 1.46 %). However, the vascular density in the surrounding non-carcinomatous mucosa assessed using ME-NBI and histologically, was significantly lower in the differentiated than in the undifferentiated types (P < 0.001). There was good agreement between ME-NBI and histologically assessed microvascular density in both the whole (r = 0.740; P < 0.001) and superficial mucosal layers (r = 0.764; P < 0.001). White opaque substance (WOS) was seen in eight patients who had the differentiated type carcinoma. In almost all cases with WOS, the appearance of the carcinoma was discolored.

Conclusions: There was a close relationship between ME-NBI assessed microvascular density and histologically assessed vascular density in the mucosal layer. Microvascular density differed significantly between the differentiated and undifferentiated types of carcinoma assessed using ME-NBI.