Download PDF
Endosc Int Open 2016; 04(08): E895-E900
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-111204
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for flat or sessile colorectal neoplasia > 20 mm: A European single-center series of 182 cases

Malte Sauer
1   Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Bonn, Bonn, Germany
,
Ralf Hildenbrand
2   Institute für Pathology Bonn-Duisdorf, Bonn, Germany
,
Tsuneo Oyama
3   Department of Endoscopy, Saku Central Hospital Advanced Care Center, Nagano, Japan
,
Bernd Sido
4   Department of General and Abdominal Surgery, Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Bonn, Bonn, Germany
,
Naohisa Yahagi
5   Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
,
Franz Ludwig Dumoulin
1   Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Bonn, Bonn, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 27 February 2016

accepted after revision 13 June 2016

Publication Date:
11 August 2016 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Background and study aims: Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an attractive method for en bloc resection of larger flat neoplastic lesions. Experience with this method is limited in the Western World.

Patients and methods: A total of 182 consecutive flat or sessile colorectal lesions (cecum n = 43; right-sided colon n = 65; left-sided colon n = 11, rectum: n = 63) with a size > 20 mm (mean 41.0 ± 17.4 mm) were resected in 178 patients. The data were recorded prospectively.

Results: ESD was technically feasible in 85.2 % of patients with a mean procedure time of 127.5 min (± 99.8) min and a complication rate of 11.5 % (microperforation 9.3 %, delayed bleeding 2.7 %, no case of emergency surgery, 30-day mortality rate 0 %). For 155 successfully completed procedures the en bloc and R0 resection rates were 88.4 and 62.6 %. Efficacy was better for smaller lesions (20 mm to 49 mm; n = 131) than for larger lesions (50 mm to 140 mm; n = 51) with R0 rates of 70.8 vs. 40.5 % (P < 0.001) and procedure times of 92.7 ± 62.4 minutes vs. 217.0 ± 120.9 minutes (P < 0,001).

Conclusions: This series confirms the efficacy of ESD for en bloc resection of colorectal lesions > 20 mm. Results are satisfactory for lesions up to 50 mm. ESD for larger lesions was associated with low R0 resection rates and very long procedure times. The clinical consequences of microperforations were minor and do not argue against the spread of ESD in the West.

Meeting presentations: The data were presented in part at DDW 2014, Chicago IL, USA (Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: AB536)

 

  • References

  • 1 Pohl H, Srivastava A, Bensen SP et al. Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy-results of the complete adenoma resection (CARE) study. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 74-80.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Robertson DJ, Lieberman DA, Winawer SJ et al. Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis. Gut 2014; 63: 949-956
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hwang JH, Konda V, Abu Dayyeh BK et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 215-226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Belderbos TD, Leenders M, Moons LM et al. Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 388-402
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Knabe M, Pohl J, Gerges C et al. Standardized long-term follow-up after endoscopic resection of large, nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a prospective two-center study. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 183-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y et al. JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc 2015; 27: 417-434
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Repici A, Hassan C, De Paula Pessoa D et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 137-150
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Wang J, Zhang XH, Ge J et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 8282-8287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hayashi Y, Shinozaki S, Sunada K et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal tumors more than 50 mm in diameter. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 602-607
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Jung da H, Youn YH, Kim JH et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lateral spreading tumors larger than 10 cm: is it feasible?. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 614-620
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Tanaka S, Toyonaga T, Morita Y et al. Feasibility and Safety of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Large Colorectal Tumors. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2015;
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Arezzo A, Passera R, Saito Y et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large noninvasive rectal lesions. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 427-438
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kawaguti FS, Nahas CS, Marques CF et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the treatment of early rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 1173-1179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kiriyama S, Saito Y, Yamamoto S et al. Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection with laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery for early-stage colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 1024-1030
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Ahlenstiel G, Hourigan LF, Brown G et al. Actual endoscopic versus predicted surgical mortality for treatment of advanced mucosal neoplasia of the colon. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 668-676
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Berr F, Ponchon T, Neureiter D et al. Experimental endoscopic submucosal dissection training in a porcine model: learning experience of skilled Western endoscopists. Dig Endosc 2011; 23: 281-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Uraoka T, Parra-Blanco A, Yahagi N. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: is it suitable in western countries?. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 28: 406-414
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hurlstone DP, Atkinson R, Sanders DS et al. Achieving R0 resection in the colorectum using endoscopic submucosal dissection. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 1536-1542
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Farhat S, Chaussade S, Ponchon T et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection in a European setting. A multi-institutional report of a technique in development. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 664-670
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Probst A, Golger D, Anthuber M et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection in large sessile lesions of the rectosigmoid: learning curve in a European center. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 660-667
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Repici A, Hassan C, Pagano N et al. High efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal laterally spreading tumors larger than 3 cm. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 96-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Agapov M, Dvoinikova E. Factors predicting clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the rectum and sigmoid colon during the learning curve. Endosc Int Open 2014; 2: E235-240
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Berr F, Wagner A, Kiesslich T et al. Untutored learning curve to establish endoscopic submucosal dissection on competence level. Digestion 2014; 89: 184-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Bialek A, Pertkiewicz J, Karpinska K et al. Treatment of large colorectal neoplasms by endoscopic submucosal dissection: a European single-center study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 26: 607-615
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Rahmi G, Hotayt B, Chaussade S et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial rectal tumors: prospective evaluation in France. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 670-676
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Spychalski M, Zelga P, Dziki A. Key factors in achieving successful endoscopic dissection of rectal tumors: early results of 33 consecutive rectal endoscopic submucosal dissections in Polish academic center. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2015; 25: 173-177
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Nagata K, Shimizu M. Pathological evaluation of gastrointestinal endoscopic submucosal dissection materials based on Japanese guidelines. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 4: 489-499
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Pox C, Aretz S, Bischoff SC et al. [S3-guideline colorectal cancer version 1.0]. Z Gastroenterol 2013; 51: 753-854
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y et al. A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 1217-1225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Lee EJ, Lee JB, Lee SH et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors--1,000 colorectal ESD cases: one specialized institute's experiences. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 31-39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Tanaka S, Oka S, Kaneko I et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: possibility of standardization. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 100-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Sato K, Ito S, Kitagawa T et al. Factors affecting the technical difficulty and clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 2959-2965
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Takeuchi Y, Iishi H, Tanaka S et al. Factors associated with technical difficulties and adverse events of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: retrospective exploratory factor analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014; 29: 1275-1284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Shiga H, Kuroha M, Endo K et al. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) performed by experienced endoscopists with limited experience in gastric ESD. Int J Colorectal Dis 2015; 30: 1645-1652
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Yang DH, Jeong GH, Song Y et al. The feasibility of performing colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection without previous experience in performing gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60: 3431-3441
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar