Die OptiBIRTH-Studie: Geburten nach Sectio

Susanne Grylka-Bäschlin; Mechthild M. Groß

doi:10.1055/s-0042-111415

Hebamme, Table of Contents

Hebamme 2016; 29(04): 226-232
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-111415

SCHWERPUNKT

Forum Geburtshilfe – Geburten nach Kaiserschnitt

Hippokrates Verlag in Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

Die OptiBIRTH-Studie: Geburten nach Sectio

Authors

Susanne Grylka-Bäschlin

¹Hebamme MSc
Mechthild M. Groß

²Hebamme, Hannover

Abstract

Die Kaiserschnittraten in Europa und in Deutschland liegen größtenteils deutlich über den empfohlenen Raten von 10–15 % [[1], [2]]. Ein wichtiger Faktor zur Senkung der Kaiserschnittraten sind höhere Raten an vaginalen Geburten nach Kaiserschnitt [[3]]. Wie kann dies gelingen?

Full Text

References

Literatur
1 Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J et al. What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reprod Health 2015; 12 (57): 1-10
2 World Health Organisation (WHO). WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. 2015 [online] Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/ 10665/161442/1/WHO_RHR_15.02_eng.pdf?ua=1
3 Sabol B, Denman MA, Guise JM. Vaginal birth after cesarean: an effective method to reduce cesarean. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2015; 58 (2): 309-319
4 Europeristat. European Perinatal Health Report, Health and Care of Pregnant Women and Babies in Europe in 2010. 2013 [onlinet] Available from: http://www.europeristat.com/reports/european-perinatal-health-report-2010.html
5 Gross MM, Matterne A, Berlage S et al. Interinstitutional variations in mode of birth after a previous caesarean section: a cross-sectional study in six German hospitals. J Perinat Med 2015; 43 (2): 177-184
6 Gregory KD, Jackson S, Korst L et al. Cesarean versus Vaginal Delivery: Whose Risks? Whose Benefits?. Am J Perinatol 2012; 29: 7-18
7 Ye J, Zhang J, Mikolajczyk R et al. Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a world-wide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data. BJOG 2016; 123 (5): 745-753
8 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). „Safe Prevention of the Primary Cesarean Delivery “. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2014; 123 (3): 693-711
9 Guise JM, Denman MA, Emeis C et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115 (6): 1267-1278
10 Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2010b Mar 191: 1-397
11 Curtin SC, Gregory KD, Korst LM et al. Maternal Morbidity for Vaginal and Cesarean Deliveries, According to Previous Cesarean History: New Data From the Birth Certificate, 2013. National Vital Statistics Reports 2015 64 (4) 1-14
12 Regan J, Thompson A, DeFranco E. The influence of mode of delivery on breastfeeding initiation in women with a prior cesarean delivery: a population-based study. Breastfeed Med 2013; 8: 181-186
13 Shorten A, Shorten B. The importance of mode of birth after previous cesarean: success, satisfaction, and postnatal health. J Midwifery Womens Health 2012; 57 (2): 126-132
14 Kealy MA, Small RE, Liamputtong P. Recovery after caesarean birth: a qualitative study of women’s accounts in Victoria, Australia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010; 10: 47, 2393-2410-47
15 Tollanes MC, Moster D, Daltveit AK et al. Cesarean section and risk of severe childhood asthma: a population-based cohort study. The Journal of pediatrics 2008; 153 (1): 112-116
16 Mesquita DN, Barbieri MA, Goldani HA et al. Cesarean Section Is Associated with Increased Peripheral and Central Adiposity in Young Adulthood: Cohort Study. PLoS One 2013; 8 (6) e66827
17 Stokholm J, Thorsen J, Chawes BL et al. Cesarean section changes neonatal gut colonization. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2016; pii: S0091-6749(16)00296-7
18 Al-Zirqi I, Stray-Pedersen B, Forsen L et al. Uterine rupture: trends over 40 years. BJOG 2016; 123 (6): 1033
19 Ashwal E, Hiersch L, Melamed N et al. Pregnancy outcome after induction of labor in women with previous cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 28 (4): 386-391
20 Kok N, Ruiter L, Hof M et al. Risk of maternal and neonatal complications in subsequent pregnancy after planned caesarean section in a first birth, compared with emergency caesarean section: a nationwide comparative cohort study. BJOG 2014; 121 (2): 216-223
21 Marshall NE, Fu R, Guise JM. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 09/2011; 205 (3) 262.e1,262.e8
22 Smith GC, Pell JP, Cameron AD et al. Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies. JAMA 2002 May 22–29 287 (20): 2684-2690
23 Bickford CD, Janssen PA. Maternal and newborn outcomes after a prior cesarean birth by planned mode of delivery and history of prior vaginal birth in British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study. CMAJ Open 2015; 3 (2) E158-165
24 Scott JR. Intrapartum management of trial of labour after caesarean delivery: evidence and experience. BJOG 2014; 121 (2): 157-162
25 Dekker GA, Chan A, Luke CG et al. Risk of uterine rupture in Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean section: a retrospective population-based cohort study. BJOG 2010; 117 (11): 1358-1365
26 Fawsitt CG, Bourke J, Greene RA et al. At what price? A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing trial of labour after previous caesarean versus elective repeat caesarean delivery. PLoS One 2013; 8 (3) e58577
27 Nilsson C, van Limbeek E, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K et al. Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: Views of Women From Countries With High VBAC Rates. Qual Health Res 2015; pii: 1049732315612041
28 Lundgren I, van Limbeek E, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K et al. Clinicians’ views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a qualitative study from countries with high VBAC rates. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015; 15: 196
29 Lundgren I, Smith V, Nilsson C et al. Clinician-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015; 15: 16
30 Nilsson C, Lundgren I, Smith V et al. Women-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): A systematic review. Midwifery 2015; 31 (7): 657-663
31 Folsom S, Esplin MS, Edmunds S et al. Patient Counseling and Preferences for Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery. AJP Rep 2016; 6 (2): e226-231
32 Mikolajczyk RT, Schmedt N, Zhang J et al. Regional variation in caesarean deliveries in Germany and its causes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013; 13 (99)1: : 8
33 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ et al. Division of Vital Statistics. Births: Final Data for 2011 Natl Vital Stat Rep 2013; 62 (2): 1-90