Download PDF
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2016; 48(03): 163-169
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-113853
Übersichtsartikel
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Skelettale Verankerungselemente – wissenschaftliches Update

Skeletal Anchorage Devices – Scientific Update
B. A. Jung
1   Klinik für Kieferorthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
,
M. Kunkel
2   Plastische Operationen, Klinik für Mund, Kiefer und Gesichtschirurgie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
17 October 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Kontinuierliche Entwicklungen auf dem Gebiet der Kieferorthopädie haben zu skelettalen Verankerungselementen geführt, die es erlauben, auch in Grenzsituationen eine positionsstabile und maximale Verankerung zu erreichen. Der vorliegende Beitrag basiert auf der wissenschaftlichen Stellungnahme der DGKFO „zur kieferorthopädischen Verankerung mit Kortikalisschrauben und Gaumenimplantaten“ aus dem Jahr 2008 [1] und hat das Ziel neuere Entwicklungen auf dem Gebiet der skelettalen Verankerung vor dem Hintergrund aktueller Literatur darzustellen.

Abstract

Continuous developments in the field of orthodontics have led to skeletal anchorage elements which make it possible to achieve maximum stable anchorage even in difficult cases. This article is based on the scientific article “On orthodontic anchorage using cortical screws and palatal implants” [1] and aims to present the latest developments in the field of skeletal anchorage against the background of the current literature.

Schlüsselwörter

skelettale Verankerung – aktuelle Trends - Indikationen und neue Methoden

Key words

skeletal anchorage – update - indications and new methods
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Wehrbein H, Jung BA, Kunkel M. Wissenschaftliche Stellungnahme zur kieferorthopädischen Verankerung mit Kortikalisschrauben und Gaumenimplantaten. http://www.dgkfo-vorstand.de/veroeffentlichungen/stellungnahmen/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Jung BA, Kunkel M, Wehrbein H. Implantologie als Hilfestellung bei kieferorthopädischen Maßnahmen. Wissen Kompakt 2010; 4: 29-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Jung BA. Lückenschluss durch kieferorthopädische Verfahren. Wann und bei wem ist er sinnvoll? Wissen Kompakt 2015; 9: 125-136
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cope JB. Temporary Anchorage Devices in Orthodontics. A paradigm shift. Sem Orthod 2005; 82: 361-378
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Göllner P. Minischrauben oder Gaumenimplantat?. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 2010; 42: 131-137
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 De Clerck H, Geerinckx V, Siciliano S. The Zygoma Anchorage System. J Clin Orthod 2002; 36: 455-459
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Mommaerts MY, Nols V, De Pauw G. Long-term prospective study of an orthodontic bone anchor. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 419-426
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Brånemark PI, Zarb G, Albrektsson T. Introduction to osseointegration. In: Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. (eds.) Tissue-integrated prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985: 11-76
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Jung B. Experimentelle und klinische Untersuchungen zu Knochenlager, Osseointegration und prognoserelevanten Erfolgs- und Einflussfaktoren beim Gaumenimplantat [Habilitation]. Mainz: Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz; 2011
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Jung BA, Kunkel M, Göllner P et al. Prognostic parameters contributing to palatal implant failures: a long-term survival analysis of 239 patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 746-750
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Costa A, Raffaini M, Melsen B. Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: a preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1998; 13: 201-209
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Favero L, Brollo P, Bressan E. Orthodontic anchorage with specific fixtures: related study analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 122: 84-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Freudenthaler JW, Haas R, Bantleon HP. Bicortical titanium screws for critical orthodontic anchorage in the mandible: a preliminary report on clinical applications. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 358-363
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ohmae M, Saito S, Morohashi T et al. Ya mada S, Shibasaki Y. A clinical and histological evaluation of titanium miniimplants as anchors for orthodontic intrusion in the beagle dog. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119: 489-497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kim YH, Yang SM, Kim S et al. Midpalatal miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage: factors affecting clinical success. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 66-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 DeClerck EE, Swennen GR. Success rate of miniplate anchorage for bone anchored maxillary protraction. Angle Orthod 2011; 81: 1010-1013
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Nguyen T, De Clerck H, Wilson M et al. Effect of Class III bone anchor treatment on airway. Angle Orthod 2015; 85: 591-596
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Jung BA, Wehrbein H, Heuser L et al. Vertical palatal bone dimensions on lateral cephalometry and cone-beam computed tomography: implications for palatal implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 664-668
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Jung BA, Wehrbein H, Wagner W et al. Preoperative diagnostic for palatal implants: is CT or CBCT necessary?. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14: 400-405
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kawa D, Kunkel M, Heuser L et al. What is the best position for palatal implants? A CBCT study on bone volume in the growing maxilla. Clin Oral Invest in press
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Holm M, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Mah J et al. Bone thickness of the anterior palate for orthodontic miniscrews. Angle Orthod 2016; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/091515-622.1.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Winsauer H, Vlachojannis C, Bumann A et al. Paramedian vertical palatal bone height for mini-implant insertion: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod 2014; 36: 541-549
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Chen G, Chen S, Zhang XY et al. A new method to evaluate the positional stability of a self-drilling miniscrew. Orthod Craniofac Res 2015; 18: 125-133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Crismani AG, Bert MH, Celar AG et al. Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: review and analysis of published clinical trials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 108-113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Jung BA, Kunkel M, Göllner P et al. Prognostic parameters contributing to palatal implant failures – a long-term survival analyis of 239 patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 746-750
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Kim YH, Yang SM, Kim S et al. Midpalatal miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage: factors affecting clinical success. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 66-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Karagkiolidou A, Ludwig B, Pazera P et al. Survival of palatal miniscrews used for orthodontic appliance anchorage: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Orthod Dentaofacial Orthop 2013; 143: 767-772
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Rodriguez JC, Suarez F, Chan HL et al. Implants for orthodontic anchorage: success rates and reasons of failures. Implant Dent 2014; 23: 155-161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Cevidanes L, Baccetti T, Franchi L et al. Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthod 2010; 80: 799-806
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Nguyen T, Cevidanes L, Cornelis MA et al. Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140: 790-798
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Hong SB, Kusnoto B, Kim EJ et al. Prognostic factors associated with the success rates of posterior orthodontic miniscrew implants: A subgroup meta-analysis. Korean J Orthod 2016; 46: 111-126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Schätzle M, Männchen R, Zwahlen M et al. Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 1351-1359
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Fäh R, Schätzle M. Complications and adverse patient reactions associated with the surgical insertion and removal of palatal implants: a retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: 653-658
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B. Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131: S43-S51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Asscherickx K, Vannet BV, Wehrbein H et al. Root repair after injury from miniscrew. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 575-578
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Kuroda S, Yamada K, Deguchi T et al. Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131 (Suppl) S68-S73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Crismani AG, Bertl MH, Celar AG et al. Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: review and analysis of published clinical trials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 108-113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Ohmae M, Saito S, Morohashi T et al. A clinical and histological evaluation of titanium miniimplants as anchors for orthodontic intrusion in the beagle dog. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119: 489-497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Wiechmann S, Meyer U, Büchter A. Success rate of mini- and micro-implants used for orthodontic anchorage: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Impl Res 2007; 18: 263-267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Chang HP, Tseng YC. Miniscrew implant applications in contemporary orthodontics. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2014; 30: 111-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Garg KK, Gupta M. Assessment of stability of orthodontic mini-implants under orthodontic loading: A computed tomography study. Indian J Dent Res 2015; 26: 237-243
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Wehrbein H, Göllner P. Skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: basics and clinical appli cation. J Orofac Orthop 2007; 68: 443-461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Hänggi M, Kuhn M, Göllner P et al. Noninvasive palatal implant removal. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: 1503-1505
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Kuhn M, Göllner P, Schätzle M et al. Non-invasive removal of sandblasted and acid-etched titanium palatal implants, a retrospective study. Eur J Orthod 2015; 37: 584-588
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar