Aktuelle Neurologie 2016; 43(08): 501-510
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-116022
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Vagusnervstimulation in der Behandlung von Epilepsiepatienten

Vagus Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Epilepsy
M. Hirsch
1   Abteilung Prächirurgische Epilepsiediagnostik – Epilepsiezentrum, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Deutschland
,
P. Reinacher
2   Abteilung Stereotaktische und Funktionelle Neurochirurgie, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Deutschland
,
A. Schulze-Bonhage
1   Abteilung Prächirurgische Epilepsiediagnostik – Epilepsiezentrum, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Deutschland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 October 2016 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Weil ca. ein Drittel der Epilepsiepatienten sich als pharamakorefraktär erweist und nicht allen diesen Patienten ein epilepsiechirurgischer Eingriff angeboten werden kann, werden weitere Behandlungsmöglichkeiten benötigt. Die Vagusnervstimulation (VNS) ist seit 1994 ein fester Bestandteil in der palliativen Behandlung von Epilepsiepatienten. In 2 Studien wurde bei fokalen Epilepsien eine signifikant bessere Wirksamkeit einer 30 Hz-Stimulation gegenüber einer Applikation subtherapeutischer seltener Einzelreize nachgewiesen (Evidenzklasse I); offene Verlaufsbeobachtungen zeigen mit der Stimulationsdauer zunehmende Responderraten (bis zu 50–60% nach 2 Jahren). Die Effektivität der VNS ist damit vergleichbar mit der Gabe eines zusätzlichen Medikamentes. Eine komplette Anfallsfreiheit wird selten erreicht (2–8% der Patienten). Studien mit kleinen Fallzahlen belegen auch eine gute Wirkung der VNS bei genetischen (idiopathischen generalisierten) Epilepsien. Es wird angenommen, dass die hauptsächliche Wirkung durch eine Neuromodulation bei chronischer Intervallstimulation entfaltet wird. Zusätzlich wird von manchen Patienten eine akute Wirkung auf die Anfallsdauer bzw. Anfallsschwere der mittels eines Magneten im Anfall aktivierten zusätzlichen Stimulationen angegeben. Der aktive Einsatz eines Magneten im Anfall ist jedoch durch verschiede Faktoren limitiert. Dies war die Rationale für die Entwicklung eines closed-loop-VNS-Systems, welches einen Anfall anhand bei Epilepsiepatienten häufig auftretender iktaler Tachykardien detektieren kann und selbstständig einen Stimulationszyklus appliziert. 2 Studien wiesen eine gute Funktion dieses VNS-Systems bei geeigneten Patienten nach. Die VNS wird in der Regel gut vertragen mit hohen Langzeitretentionsraten der Anwendung. Die häufigsten stimulationsbedingten Nebenwirkungen wie Heiserkeit, Parästhesien, Husten, Dyspnoe sind mit der Zeit deutlich rückläufig. Die Raten kardialer Nebenwirkungen und die Operationsrisiken sind sehr niedrig. Vorsicht ist geboten bei Patienten mit einem Schlaf-Apnoe-Syndrom, weil die VNS die Beschwerden verschlechtern kann. Ein antidepressiver Effekt der VNS gilt als belegt, weshalb auch eine Zulassung zur Behandlung der Depression unabhängig von der Diagnose einer Epilepsie besteht. Die sensible Innervation der Concha des Ohres durch den Ramus auricularis des N. vagus ist Grundlage für die Wirkung eines neuerdings erhältlichen Gerätes zur transkutanen Vagusnervstimulation. Eine randomisierte, kontrollierte Studie zur Wirksamkeit der transkutanen VNS bei 76 Patienten konnte keine Überlegenheit der hochdosierten Stimulation gegenüber der Kontrollgruppe nachweisen, obgleich sich eine positive Wirkung abzeichnete; Die Studie verfügte zum Wirksamkeitsnachweis nicht über genügend statistische power. Auch für die transkutane VNS werden antidepressive Effekte berichtet, daneben auch positive Effekte auf die Kognition.

Abstract

Because about a third of epilepsy patients are drug resistant and epilepsy surgery can not be offered to all these patients, additional treatment options are needed. Since 1994, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been an integral part of the palliative treatment of patients with epilepsy. In 2 studies a significantly better efficacy in treatment of focal epilepsy was verified for 30 Hz Stimulation as compared to the application of subtherapeutic rare single impulses (evidence class I); open history observations show that with increasing duration of stimulation, there is an increase in responder rates (up to 50–60% after 2 years). The effectiveness of VNS is therefore comparable to administration of an additional drug. Complete seizure freedom is rarely achieved (2–8% of patients). Studies with small numbers of patients also show a good effect of VNS in genetic (idiopathic generalized) epilepsy. It is believed that the main effect results from neuromodulation through chronic interval stimulation. In addition, patients reported an acute effect on seizure duration and severity by additional stimulations activated by a magnet in the course of the seizure. The active use of a magnet during a seizure, however, is limited by various factors. This was the rationale for the development of a closed-loop VNS system that can detect ictal tachycardia that frequently occurs in patients during an epileptic seizure and independently triggers a stimulation cycle. 2 studies have demonstrated the VNS system to function well in appropriate patients. The VNS is generally well tolerated with high long-term retention rates of application. The most common stimulation-induced side effects such as hoarseness, paresthesia, cough, and dyspnea clearly decline with time. The rate of cardiac side effects and the risks of surgery are very low. Caution is advised in patients with sleep apnea syndrome because the VNS may worsen the symptoms. An antidepressant effect of VNS is considered as established so that it has received approval for treatment of depression independent of the diagnosis of epilepsy. The sensory innervation of the concha of the ear by the auricular branch of the vagus nerve is the basis for the action of a newly available device for transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation. A randomized, controlled study of the efficacy of transcutaneous VNS in 76 patients could not demonstrate superiority of high-dose stimulation compared with the control group, although there were signs of a positive effect. The proof-of-efficacy study does not have sufficient statistical power. Besides antidepressant effects, transcutaneous VNS has also been reported to have positive effects on cognition.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Kwan P, Arzimanoglou A, Berg AT et al. Definition of drug resistant epilepsy: consensus proposal by the ad hoc Task Force of the ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies. Epilepsia 2010; 51: 1069-1077
  • 2 Kwan P, Brodie MJ. Definition of refractory epilepsy: defining the indefinable?. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9: 27-29
  • 3 Englot DJ, Chang EF. Rates and predictors of seizure freedom in resective epilepsy surgery: an update. Neurosurgical review 2014; 37: 389-404 discussion 404–405
  • 4 Englot DJ, Raygor KP, Molinaro AM et al. Factors associated with failed focal neocortical epilepsy surgery. Neurosurgery 2014; 75: 648-645 discussion 655; quiz 656
  • 5 Englot DJ, Lee AT, Tsai C et al. Seizure types and frequency in patients who “fail” temporal lobectomy for intractable epilepsy. Neurosurgery 2013; 73: 838-844 quiz 844
  • 6 Engel J, Wiebe S. Who is a surgical candidate?. 2012; 108: 821-828
  • 7 Ryvlin P, Nashef L, Lhatoo SD et al. Incidence and mechanisms of cardiorespiratory arrests in epilepsy monitoring units (MORTEMUS): a retrospective study. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12: 966-977
  • 8 Lockard JS, Congdon WC, DuCharme LL. Feasibility and safety of vagal stimulation in monkey model. Epilepsia 1990; 31 (Suppl. 02) S20-S26
  • 9 Woodbury DM, Woodbury JW. Effects of vagal stimulation on experimentally induced seizures in rats. Epilepsia 1990; 31 (Suppl. 02) S7-S19
  • 10 Woodbury JW, Woodbury DM. Vagal stimulation reduces the severity of maximal electroshock seizures in intact rats: use of a cuff electrode for stimulating and recording. Pacing and clinical electrophysiology: PACE 1991; 14: 94-107
  • 11 Zabara J. Inhibition of experimental seizures in canines by repetitive vagal stimulation. Epilepsia 1992; 33: 1005-1012
  • 12 Ben-Menachem E, Mañon-Espaillat R, Ristanovic R et al. Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of partial seizures: 1. A controlled study of effect on seizures. First International Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group. Epilepsia 1994; 35: 616-626
  • 13 The Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group . A randomized controlled trial of chronic vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of medically intractable seizures. The Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group. Neurology 1995; 45: 224-230
  • 14 Uthman BM, Wilder BJ, Penry JK et al. Treatment of epilepsy by stimulation of the vagus nerve. Neurology 1993; 43: 1338-1345
  • 15 Ben-Menachem E. Vagus-nerve stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy. Lancet Neurol 2002; 1: 477-482
  • 16 Henry TR. Therapeutic mechanisms of vagus nerve stimulation. Neurology 2002; 59: S3-S14
  • 17 Beekwilder JP, Beems T. Overview of the clinical applications of vagus nerve stimulation. J Clin Neurophysiol 2010; 27: 130-138
  • 18 Walker BR, Easton A, Gale K. Regulation of limbic motor seizures by GABA and glutamate transmission in nucleus tractus solitarius. Epilepsia 1999; 40: 1051-1057
  • 19 Krahl SE, Clark KB, Smith DC et al. Locus coeruleus lesions suppress the seizure-attenuating effects of vagus nerve stimulation. Epilepsia 1998; 39: 709-714
  • 20 Vonck K, de Herdt V, Bosman T et al. Thalamic and limbic involvement in the mechanism of action of vagus nerve stimulation, a SPECT study. Seizure 2008; 17: 699-706
  • 21 Raedt R, Clinckers R, Mollet L et al. Increased hippocampal noradrenaline is a biomarker for efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in a limbic seizure model. J Neurochem 2011; 117: 461-469
  • 22 Handforth A, DeGiorgio CM, Schachter SC et al. Vagus nerve stimulation therapy for partial-onset seizures: a randomized active-control trial. Neurology 1998; 51: 48-55
  • 23 Fisher RS, Handforth A. Reassessment: vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy: a report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 1999; 53: 666-669
  • 24 Klinkenberg S, Aalbers MW Vles et al. Vagus nerve stimulation in children with intractable epilepsy: a randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol 2012; 54: 855-861
  • 25 Robinson R. Vagus nerve stimulation in children with intractable epilepsy: a randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol 2013; 55: 195
  • 26 Morris GL, Mueller WM. Long-term treatment with vagus nerve stimulation in patients with refractory epilepsy. The Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group E01–E05. Neurology 1999; 53: 1731-1735
  • 27 Tatum WO, Johnson KD, Goff S et al. Vagus nerve stimulation and drug reduction. Neurology 2001; 56: 561-563
  • 28 McHugh JC, Singh HW, Phillips J et al. Outcome measurement after vagal nerve stimulation therapy: proposal of a new classification. Epilepsia 2007; 48: 375-378
  • 29 Orosz I, McCormick D, Zamponi N et al. Vagus nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: a European long-term study up to 24 months in 347 children. Epilepsia 2014; 55: 1576-1584
  • 30 Englot DJ, Rolston JD, Wright CW et al. Rates and predictors of seizure freedom with vagus nerve stimulation for intractable Epilepsy. Neurosurgery 2015;
  • 31 Montavont A, Demarquay G, Ryvlin P et al. Efficacité de la stimulation intermittente du nerf vague dans les épilepsies pharmaco-résistantes non chirurgicales de l’adolescent et de l’adulte. Revue neurologique 2007; 163: 1169-1177
  • 32 Alexopoulos AV, Kotagal P, Loddenkemper T et al. Long-term results with vagus nerve stimulation in children with pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Seizure 2006; 15: 491-503
  • 33 Ryvlin P, Gilliam FG, Nguyen DK et al. The long-term effect of vagus nerve stimulation on quality of life in patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy: the PuLsE (Open Prospective Randomized Long-term Effectiveness) trial. Epilepsia 2014; 55: 893-900
  • 34 Kostov H, Larsson PG, Røste GK. Is vagus nerve stimulation a treatment option for patients with drug-resistant idiopathic generalized epilepsy?. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 2007; 187: 55-58
  • 35 Ng M, Devinsky O. Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory idiopathic generalised epilepsy. Seizure 2004; 13: 176-178
  • 36 Boon P, Vonck K, van Walleghem P et al. Programmed and magnet-induced vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy. J Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 18: 402-407
  • 37 Majkowska-Zwolińska B, Zwoliński P, Roszkowski M et al. Long-term results of vagus nerve stimulation in children and adolescents with drug-resistant epilepsy. Child’s nervous system: ChNS: official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery 2012; 28: 621-628
  • 38 Morris GL. A retrospective analysis of the effects of magnet-activated stimulation in conjunction with vagus nerve stimulation therapy. 4: 740-745
  • 39 Hermann BP, Trenerry MR, Colligan RC. Learned helplessness, attributional style, and depression in epilepsy. Bozeman Epilepsy Surgery Consortium. Epilepsia 1996; 37: 680-686
  • 40 Eggleston KS, Olin BD, Fisher RS. Ictal tachycardia: the head-heart connection. Seizure 2014; 23: 496-505
  • 41 Boon P, Vonck K, van Rijckevorsel K et al. A prospective, multicenter study of cardiac-based seizure detection to activate vagus nerve stimulation. Seizure 2015; 32: 52-61
  • 42 Fisher RS, Afra P, Macken M et al. Automatic Vagus Nerve Stimulation triggered by ictal tachycardia: clinical outcomes and device performance – the U.S. E-37 trial. Neuromodulation 2015;
  • 43 Hampel KG, Vatter H, Elger CE et al. Cardiac-based vagus nerve stimulation reduced seizure duration in a patient with refractory epilepsy. Seizure 2015; 26: 81-85
  • 44 Elger G, Hoppe C, Falkai P et al. Vagus nerve stimulation is associated with mood improvements in epilepsy patients. Epilepsy Res 2000; 42: 203-210
  • 45 Harden CL, Pulver MC, Ravdin LD et al. A pilot study of mood in epilepsy patients treated with vagus nerve stimulation. Epilepsy Behav: E&B 2000; 1: 93-99
  • 46 Rush AJ, Marangell LB, Sackeim HA et al. Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized, controlled acute phase trial. Biol Psychiatry 2005; 58: 347-354
  • 47 Vonck K, Raedt R, Naulaerts J et al. Vagus nerve stimulation…25 years later! What do we know about the effects on cognition?. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2014; 45: 63-71
  • 48 Klinkenberg S, Majoie HJM, van der Heijden MMAA et al. Vagus nerve stimulation has a positive effect on mood in patients with refractory epilepsy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2012; 114: 336-340
  • 49 Sjögren MJC, Hellström PTO, Jonsson MAG et al. Cognition-enhancing effect of vagus nerve stimulation in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a pilot study. J Clin Psychiatry 2002; 63: 972-980
  • 50 Sackeim HA, Keilp JG, Rush AJ et al. The effects of vagus nerve stimulation on cognitive performance in patients with treatment-resistant depression. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 2001; 14: 53-62
  • 51 Ben-Menachem E. Vagus nerve stimulation, side effects, and long-term safety. J Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 18: 415-418
  • 52 Ramsay RE, Uthman BM, Augustinsson LE et al. Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of partial seizures: 2. Safety, side effects, and tolerability. First International Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group. Epilepsia 1994; 35: 627-636
  • 53 Parhizgar F, Nugent K, Raj R. Obstructive sleep apnea and respiratory complications associated with vagus nerve stimulators. J Clin Sleep Med 2011; 7: 401-407
  • 54 Malow BA, Edwards J, Marzec M et al. Effects of vagus nerve stimulation on respiration during sleep: a pilot study. Neurology 2000; 55: 1450-1454
  • 55 Marzec M, Edwards J, Sagher O et al. Effects of vagus nerve stimulation on sleep-related breathing in epilepsy patients. Epilepsia 2003; 44: 930-935
  • 56 Hsieh T, Chen M, McAfee A et al. Sleep-related breathing disorder in children with vagal nerve stimulators. Pediatr Neurol 2008; 38: 99-103
  • 57 Gschliesser V, Högl B, Frauscher B et al. Mode of vagus nerve stimulation differentially affects sleep related breathing in patients with epilepsy. Seizure 2009; 18: 339-342
  • 58 Kahlow H, Olivecrona M. Complications of vagal nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: a single center longitudinal study of 143 patients. Seizure 2013; 22: 827-833
  • 59 Tatum WO, Moore DB, Stecker MM et al. Ventricular asystole during vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy in humans. Neurology 1999; 52: 1267-1269
  • 60 Ali II, Pirzada NA, Kanjwal Y et al. Complete heart block with ventricular asystole during left vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2004; 5: 768-771
  • 61 Ardesch JJ, Buschman HPJ, van der Burgh PH et al. Cardiac responses of vagus nerve stimulation: intraoperative bradycardia and subsequent chronic stimulation. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2007; 109: 849-852
  • 62 Schuurman PR, Beukers RJ. Ventricular asystole during vagal nerve stimulation. Epilepsia 2009; 50: 967-968
  • 63 Iriarte J, Urrestarazu E, Alegre M et al. Late-onset periodic asystolia during vagus nerve stimulation. Epilepsia 2009; 50: 928-932
  • 64 Borusiak P, Zilbauer M, Cagnoli S et al. Late-onset cardiac arrhythmia associated with vagus nerve stimulation. J Neurol 2009; 256: 1578-1580
  • 65 Amark P, Stödberg T, Wallstedt L. Late onset bradyarrhythmia during vagus nerve stimulation. Epilepsia 2007; 48: 1023-1024
  • 66 Husain MM, Stegman D, Trevino K. Pregnancy and delivery while receiving vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of major depression: a case report. Ann General Psychiatr 2005; 4: 16
  • 67 Ben-Menachem E, Hellström K, Waldton C et al. Evaluation of refractory epilepsy treated with vagus nerve stimulation for up to 5 years. Neurology 1999; 52: 1265-1267
  • 68 Stefan H, Kreiselmeyer G, Kerling F et al. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (t-VNS) in pharmacoresistant epilepsies: a proof of concept trial. Epilepsia 2012; 53: e115-e118
  • 69 Bauer S, Baier H, Baumgartner C et al. Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) for Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial (cMPsE02). Brain Stimulation 2016; 9: 356-363
  • 70 Kraus T, Hösl K, Kiess O et al. BOLD fMRI deactivation of limbic and temporal brain structures and mood enhancing effect by transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation. J Neural Transmission (Vienna) 2007; 114: 1485-1493
  • 71 Hein E, Nowak M, Kiess O et al. Auricular transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in depressed patients: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Neural Transmission (Vienna) 2013; 120: 821-827
  • 72 Trevizol AP, Shiozawa P, Taiar I et al. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) for major depressive disorder: an open label proof-of-concept trial. Brain Stimul 2016; 9: 453-454
  • 73 Rong P, Liu J, Wang L et al. Effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on major depressive disorder: A nonrandomized controlled pilot study. J Affect Disord 2016; 195: 172-179
  • 74 Jacobs HIL, Riphagen JM, Razat CM et al. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation boosts associative memory in older individuals. Neurobiol Aging 2015; 36: 1860-1867
  • 75 Tsao C. The efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in intractable epilepsy associated with nonketotic hyperglycinemia in two children. J Child Neurol 2010; 25: 375-378
  • 76 Buoni S, Zannolli R, Macucci F et al. Delayed response of seizures with vagus nerve stimulation in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Neurology 2004; 63: 1539-1540
  • 77 Englot DJ, Rolston JD, Wang DD et al. Efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in posttraumatic versus nontraumatic epilepsy. J Neurosurg 2012; 117: 970-977
  • 78 García-Navarrete E, Torres CV, Gallego I et al. Long-term results of vagal nerve stimulation for adults with medication-resistant epilepsy who have been on unchanged antiepileptic medication. Seizure 2013; 22: 9-13
  • 79 Englot DJ, Chang EF, Auguste KI. Vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy: a meta-analysis of efficacy and predictors of response. J Neurosurg 2011; 115: 1248-1255
  • 80 Labar D. Vagus nerve stimulation for intractable epilepsy in children. Dev Med Child Neurol 2000; 42: 496-499