Endosc Int Open 2016; 04(11): E1194-E1196
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-116147
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Right adrenal gland prospective evaluation through transgastric endoscopic ultrasound: an alternative approach

Pedro C. Figueiredo
1   Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Luz, Lisbon, Portugal
,
Pedro Pinto-Marques
1   Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Luz, Lisbon, Portugal
,
Ines Almeida
1   Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Luz, Lisbon, Portugal
,
Pedro C. Gomes
2   Anesthesiology Department, Hospital da Luz, Lisbon, Portugal
,
David Serra
1   Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Luz, Lisbon, Portugal
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted11 April 2016

accepted after revision19 August 2016

Publication Date:
07 October 2016 (online)

Background and aims: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided right adrenal gland (RAG) evaluation is frequently unsuccessful and, when feasible, requires a cumbersome maneuver through the duodenum. In our experience, the use of a recent ultrasound platform has enabled transgastric detection of the RAG with a simple maneuver. The aim of this study was to determine the RAG transgastric EUS detection rate and identify predictive factors for failure.

Methods: Consecutive patients referred to EUS in a single center were prospectively included over a 6-month period. Success was defined as RAG transgastric EUS detection within 180 seconds. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with failure.

Results: Among 100 patients, the success rate for RAG transgastric EUS detection was 75 %, with a median maneuver duration of 45 seconds [interquartile range, 25 – 70 seconds]. Two incidental RAG lesions were detected. Of possible demographic and anthropometric predictive factors for failure, only age (OR 1.04; P = 0.04) was statistically significant on multivariate analysis.

Conclusions: The transgastric EUS approach for RAG detection is simple, fast and effective.

 
  • References

  • 1 Kloos RT, Gross MD, Francis IR et al. Incidentally discovered adrenal masses. Endocr Rev 1995; 16: 460-484
  • 2 Zeiger MA, Thompson GB, Duh QY et al. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Association of Endocrine Surgeons medical guidelines for the management of adrenal incidentalomas. Endocr Pract 2009; 15 (Suppl. 01) 1-20
  • 3 Disibio G, French SW. Metastatic patterns of cancers: results from a large autopsy study. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2008; 132: 931-939
  • 4 Gress FG, Savides TJ. Endoscopic ultrasonography. 2nd. edn. Chichester, UK; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009
  • 5 Dietrich CF, Wehrmann T, Hoffmann C et al. Detection of the adrenal glands by endoscopic or transabdominal ultrasound. Endoscopy 1997; 29: 859-864
  • 6 Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E et al. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 1373-1379
  • 7 Long JS. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1997
  • 8 Vila JJ, Jiménez FJ, Irisarri R et al. Prospective observational study of the incidental findings on endoscopic ultrasonography: should a complete exploration always be performed?. Scand J Gastroenterol 2009; 44: 1139-1145
  • 9 Uemura S, Yasuda I, Kato T et al. Preoperative routine evaluation of bilateral adrenal glands by endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration in patients with potentially resectable lung cancer. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 195-201
  • 10 Eloubeidi MA, Morgan DE, Cerfolio RJ et al. Transduodenal EUS-guided FNA of the right adrenal gland. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 522-527