Randomized comparative evaluation of endoscopic submucosal dissection self-learning software in France and Japan
submitted 08 January 2016
accepted after revision 26 July 2016
05 October 2016 (online)
Background and study aim: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is currently the reference method to achieve an en bloc resection for large lesions; however, the technique is difficult and risky, with a long learning curve. In order to reduce the morbidity, training courses that use animal models are recommended. Recently, self-learning software has been developed to assist students in their training. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of this tool on the ESD learning curve.
Methods: A prospective, randomized, comparative study enrolled 39 students who were experienced in interventional endoscopy. Each student was randomized to one of two groups and performed 30 ESDs of 30 mm standardized lesions in a bovine colon model. The software group used the self-learning software whereas the control group only observed an ESD procedure video. The primary outcome was the rate of successful ESD procedures, defined as complete en bloc resection without any perforation and performed in less than 75 minutes.
Results: A total of 39 students performed 1170 ESDs. Success was achieved in 404 (70.9 %) in the software group and 367 (61.2 %) in the control group (P = 0.03). Among the successful procedures, there were no significant differences between the software and control groups in terms of perforation rate (22 [4.0 %] vs. 29 [5.1 %], respectively; P = 0.27) and mean (SD) procedure duration (34.1 [13.4] vs. 32.3 [14.0] minutes, respectively; P = 0.52). For the 30th procedure, the rate of complete resection was superior in the software group (84.2 %) compared with the control group (50.0 %; P = 0.01).
Conclusion: ESD self-learning software was effective in improving the quality of resection compared with a standard teaching method using procedure videos. This result suggests the benefit of incorporating such software into teaching programs.
- 1 Parra-Blanco A. Endoscopic submucosal dissection training with pig models in a Western country. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 2895
- 2 Berr F, Ponchon T, Neureiter D et al. Experimental endoscopic submucosal dissection training in a porcine model: learning experience of skilled Western endoscopists. Dig Endosc 2011; 23: 281-289
- 3 Goda K, Fujishiro M, Hirasawa K et al. How to teach and learn endoscopic submucosal dissection for upper gastrointestinal neoplasm in Japan. Dig Endosc 2012; 24: 136-142
- 4 Iacopini F, Bella A, Costamagna G et al. Stepwise training in rectal and colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection with differentiated learning curves. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 1188-1196
- 5 Kakushima N, Hirasawa K, Morita Y et al. Terminology for training of endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Endosc 2012; 24 (Suppl. 01) 133-135
- 6 Martinek J, Suchanek S, Stefanova M et al. Training on an ex vivo animal model improves endoscopic skills: a randomized, single-blind study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 367-373
- 7 Ohata K, Ito T, Chiba H et al. Effective training system in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Endosc 2012; 24 (Suppl. 01) 84-89
- 8 Tanaka S, Morita Y, Fujita T et al. Ex vivo pig training model for esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for endoscopists with experience in gastric ESD. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 1579-1586
- 9 Pioche M, Rivory J, Aguero-Garcete G et al. New isolated bovine colon model dedicated to colonic ESD hands-on training: development and first evaluation. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 3209-3215
- 10 Donner A, Piaggio G, Villar J. Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of cluster randomization trials. Stat Methods Med Res 2001; 10: 325-338
- 11 Deprez PH, Bergman JJ, Meisner S et al. Current practice with endoscopic submucosal dissection in Europe: position statement from a panel of experts. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 853-858
- 12 Pioche M, Mais L, Guillaud O et al. Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for large esophageal neoplastic lesions. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 1032-1034