CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2017; 05(01): E17-E24
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-122960
Original article
Eigentümer und Copyright ©Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in very elderly patients age 85 or older

Ko Watanabe
1   Department of Endoscopy, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
,
Takuto Hikichi
1   Department of Endoscopy, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
,
Jun Nakamura
1   Department of Endoscopy, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
,
Tadayuki Takagi
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
,
Rei Suzuki
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
,
Mitsuru Sugimoto MD
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
,
Yuichi Waragai
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
,
Hitomi Kikuchi
1   Department of Endoscopy, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
,
Naoki Konno
1   Department of Endoscopy, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
,
Hiroyuki Asama
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
,
Mika Takasumi
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
,
Katsutoshi Obara
3   Department of Advanced Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
,
Hiromasa Ohira
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 02 February 2016

accepted after revision 24 October 2016

Publication Date:
20 January 2017 (online)

Abstract

Background and study aims The safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) in very elderly patients remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ESD for EGC in patients age 85 years and older.

Patients and methods Patients who underwent ESD for EGC between September 2003 and April 2015 were divided into 3 groups: the very elderly (≥ 85 years; 43 patients), the elderly (65 – 84 years; 511 patients), and the non-elderly ( ≤ 64 years; 161 patients). Adverse events (AEs) were used as the primary endpoint to assess the safety of ESD, and the ESD treatment outcomes (i. e., en bloc resection rate, complete en bloc resection rate, and curative resection rate) and the overall survival rate after ESD were the secondary endpoints. These parameters were retrospectively evaluated in the 3 groups.

Results There were no significant differences in AEs (non-elderly, elderly, and very elderly: 7.3, 9.5, and 12.5 %, respectively, P = 0.491) or in the en bloc resection and complete en bloc resection rates among the three groups. However, there was a significant difference in the curative resection rates (non-elderly, elderly, and very elderly: 91.5, 84.1, and 77.1 %, respectively, P = 0.014). Regarding overall survival, there was a significant difference among the three groups (1-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates: non-elderly: 98.6, 90.2, and 74.7 %; elderly: 97.2, 86.2, and 61.9 %; and very elderly: 92.7, 66.8, and 34.4 %, respectively, P = 0.001). Moreover, the overall survival rate in the very elderly patients with cardiovascular disease was significantly lower than that in the very elderly patients without cardiovascular disease (P < 0.001).

Conclusions ESD is an acceptable treatment for EGC in patients 85 years of age or older in terms of safety. However, the overall survival after ESD in the very elderly patients with cardiovascular disease was short.

 
  • References

  • 1 Suzman R. Willis DP. Manton KG. Introducing the oldest old. In: Suzman R. Willis DP. Manton KG. , eds. The oldest old. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992
  • 2 Oda I. Saito D. Tada M. et al. A multicenter retrospective study of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2006; 9: 262-270
  • 3 Isomoto H. Shikuwa S. Yamaguchi N. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a large-scale feasibility study. Gut 2009; 58: 331-336
  • 4 Kakushima N. Fujishiro M. Kodashima S. et al. Technical feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms in the elderly Japanese population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 22: 311-314
  • 5 Isomoto H. Ohnita K. Yamaguchi N. et al. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in elderly patients with early gastric cancer. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 22: 311-317
  • 6 Abe N. Gotoda T. Hirasawa T. et al. Multicenter study of the long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in patients 80 years of age or older. Gastric Cancer 2012; 15: 70-75
  • 7 Tokioka S. Umegaki E. Murano M. et al. Utility and problems of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in elderly patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 27: 63-69
  • 8 Toyokawa T. Fujita I. Morikawa T. et al. Clinical outcomes of ESD for early gastric neoplasms in elderly patients. Eur J Clin Invest 2011; 41: 474-478
  • 9 Zhang Y. Huang L. Li L. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms in elderly patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2014; 24: 391-398
  • 10 Chinda D. Sasaki Y. Tatsuta T. et al. Perioperative adverse events of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in elderly Japanese patients 75 years of age or older. Intern Med 2015; 54: 267-272
  • 11 Kato M. Michida T. Kusakabe A. et al. Safety and short-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in elderly patients. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E521-E526
  • 12 Arai T. Esaki Y. Inoshita N. et al. Pathologic characteristics of gastric cancer in the elderly: a retrospective study of 994 surgical patients. Gastric Cancer 2004; 7: 154-159
  • 13 Yoshifuku Y. Oka S. Tanaka S. et al. Long-term prognosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in super-elderly patients. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 4321-4329
  • 14 Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 2011; 14: 101-112
  • 15 Man-i M. Morita Y. Fujita T. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasm in patients with co-morbidities categorized according to the ASA physical status classification. Gastric Cancer 2013; 16: 56-66
  • 16 Kim BJ. Chang TH. Kim JJ. et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in patients with comorbid diseases. Gut Liver 2010; 4: 186-191
  • 17 Tsukuma H. Oshima A. Narahara H. et al. Natural history of early gastric cancer: a non-concurrent, long term, follow up study. Gut 2000; 47: 618-621
  • 18 Fujisaki J. Nakajima T. Hirasawa T. et al. Natural history of gastric cancer–a case followed up for eight years: early to advanced gastric cancer. Clin J Gastroenterol 2012; 5: 351-354
  • 19 Gotoda T. Yanagisawa A. Sasako M. et al. Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers. Gastric Cancer 2000; 3: 219-225
  • 20 Kusano C. Iwasaki M. Kaltenbach T. et al. Should elderly patients undergo additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer? Long-term comparative outcomes. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 1064-1069
  • 21 Kiyokawa T. Hiki N. Nunobe S. et al. Feasibility of gastrectomy with standard lymphadenectomy for patients over 85 years old with gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22: 3962-3969