CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Yearb Med Inform 2022; 31(01): 011-014
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742505
Position Paper

Datafication: the Flavor and Scent of Data

Lars Botin
Department of Planning, Aalborg University, Copenhagen, Denmark
› Author Affiliations

Summary

This paper deals with data handling in health care on three distinct and different levels. The three levels can be classified in the following way: ethical level based on principles, political level based on negotiations and relations, and phenomenological level based on relation in between the physical and digital world. The paper takes an outset in a recent report, published in October 2021, from the Lancet and Financial Times Commission on governing health futures 2030 (ethical level), and a recent publication (2020) and exhibition at the Biennale of Architecture in Venice (2021) on Data Publics (political level), and finally makes an attempt to frame our being with digital technology on a philosophical and phenomenological level. It is the assumption that all these levels are needed the moment we try to appropriate and incorporate data in different arenas and worlds, might they be global, national, institutional, or/and individual.



Publication History

Article published online:
02 June 2022

© 2022. IMIA and Thieme. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Mörtenböck P, Mooshammer H. Data Publics. Data Plurality in an Era of Data Determinacy. London and New York: Routledge; 2020. p. 8-9.
  • 2 Hardt M, Negri A. Multitude: Ward and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin Press; 2004.
  • 3 Butler J. Giving an Account of Oneself. Fordham University Press; 2005.
  • 4 Jameson F. Postmodernism, Or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Duke University Press; 1991.
  • 5 Deleuze G, Guattari F. A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London and New York: Continuum; 2004.
  • 6 Kickbusch I, Piselli D, Agrawal A, Balicer R, Banner O, Adelhardt M, et al. Secretariat of the Lancet and Financial Times Commission. The Lancet and Financial Times Commission on governing health futures 2030: growing up in a digital world. Lancet 2021 Nov 6;398(10312):1727-76.
  • 7 McLuhan M. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 1994. p. 18.
  • 8 Merleau-Ponty M. The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston: Northwestern University Press; 1968. p. 391-266.
  • 9 Botin L. The Chiasm: Thinking Things and Thinging Thoughts. Our Being with Technology. In: Lindberg S, Roine H-R, editors. The Ethos of Digital Environments. Technology, Literary Theory and Philosophy. New York and London: Routledge; 2021.
  • 10 Rosa H. Resonance. A Sociology of Our Relationship to the World. Cambridge: Polity; 2019. p. 392.
  • 11 Floridi L, editor. The Onlife Manifesto. Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era. Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer; 2015. p. 6-8.
  • 12 Botin L, Bertelsen PS, Kayser L, Turner P, Villumsen S, Nøhr C. People Centeredness, Chronic Conditions and Diversity Sensitive eHealth: Exploring Emancipation of the 'Health Care System' and the 'Patient' in Health Informatics. Life (Basel) 2020 Dec 7;10(12):329.