Endoscopy 2022; 54(S 01): S170
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1745024
Abstracts | ESGE Days 2022
ESGE Days 2022 Digital poster exhibition

ENDOSCOPIST DIRECTED PROPOFOL SEDATION IN EUS: PREDICTIVE FACTORS OF SEVERE ADVERSE EVENTS

P. Huelin Álvarez
1   Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain
,
E. Pijoan Comas
2   Clínica Girona, Girona, Spain
3   Hospital de Palamós, Palamós, Spain
,
I. Miguel Salas
1   Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain
,
G. Torres Vicente
1   Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain
,
M. Alburquerque Miranda
2   Clínica Girona, Girona, Spain
3   Hospital de Palamós, Palamós, Spain
,
A. Vargas García
2   Clínica Girona, Girona, Spain
3   Hospital de Palamós, Palamós, Spain
,
M. Figa Francesch
2   Clínica Girona, Girona, Spain
,
N. Zaragoza Velasco
1   Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain
,
J.M. Reñé Espinet
1   Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain
,
F. Gonzalez-Huix Lladó
1   Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain
2   Clínica Girona, Girona, Spain
,
SEE D Working Group on Sedation
› Author Affiliations
 

Aims Severe adverse events including hypoventilation and laryngospasm during EUS are frequently related to the wider tip of the echoendoscopes.

AIM To determine predictive factors of adverse events during digestive EUS procedures in anesthesiologist or endoscopist directed propofol sedation scenario.

Methods Analysis of a prospective bicentric registry 2018-2021. Diagnostic and therapeutic EUS procedures in consecutive patients were included. Type of sedation (endoscopist or anesthesiologist), echoendoscope (radial/linear) and risk factors for complications of propofol sedation were recorded (ASA, OSAHS, Performance status, facial characteristics, obesity, and associated comorbidity).

Results 735 patients were included (age: 65±; 47% women). Propofol: 310 ml (IQR: 220-435); Midazolam 0 ml (IQR: 0-2 ml). Severe adverse events occurred in 31 (4,2%): 3% laryngospasm, 1,4% Sat02<75%. Multivariate analysis detected Retrognathia (OR: 3,17; 95%IC: 1,30-7,74), Anesthesiologist directed sedation (OR: 2,48; 95% IC: 1,15-5,34) and OSAHS (OR: 3.01; 95% IC: 1,41-6,43) as predictive factors of severe adverse events.

Conclusions A trained sedation endoscopist team can administer propofol sedation in EUS with less adverse events than anesthesiologist directed sedation.



Publication History

Article published online:
14 April 2022

© 2022. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany