Endoscopy 2022; 54(S 01): S283
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1745405
Abstracts | ESGE Days 2022
ESGE Days 2022 Digital poster exhibition

RISK FACTORS FOR NON-CURATIVE ENDOSCOPIC RESECTION OF EARLY GASTRIC CANCER

H. Uchima
1   Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, Gastroenterology, Badalona, Spain
2   Teknon Medical Center, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Barcelona, Spain
,
D. Libânio
3   Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto, Porto, Portugal, Gastroenterology Department, Porto, Portugal
,
R. Ortigão
3   Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto, Porto, Portugal, Gastroenterology Department, Porto, Portugal
,
M. Carrasco
3   Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto, Porto, Portugal, Gastroenterology Department, Porto, Portugal
,
L.P. Afonso
3   Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto, Porto, Portugal, Gastroenterology Department, Porto, Portugal
,
P. Pimentel-Nunes
3   Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto, Porto, Portugal, Gastroenterology Department, Porto, Portugal
,
M. Dinis-Ribeiro
3   Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto, Porto, Portugal, Gastroenterology Department, Porto, Portugal
› Author Affiliations
 

Aims Early gastric cancer (EGC) is defined as adenocarcinoma that invades no more deeply than the submucosa irrespective of lymph node metastasis (LNM). In selected cases of EGC with very low risk of LNM endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be curative. However, in 20% of cases there are pathological features other than the standard and expanded criteria that may lead to non-curative resection (NCR).

Aims To identify the pre-treatment risk factors for NCR curability that may improve selecting cases for ESD.

Methods Single center retrospective cohort of consecutive patients with EGC that underwent ESD (2005 – 2020). Collected data was compared between 2 groups: curative vs NCR with risk of LNM. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed.

Results 668 lesions underwent ESD for EGC, of which 82 (12%) presented NCR with risk of LNM and 586 lesions were assigned to the Curative group.

Mean age,%male sex,%en bloc ESD and mean size were 66.9, 57.3%, 97.1% and 18.95mm in the Curative Group and 68.5, 72%, 93.9%, 27.29mm in the NCR Group.

The identified risk factors were related to location, size, presence of ulceration, histology on previous endoscopic biopsies and morphology of the lesion (Table, multivariate).

Male sex was associated with NCR on univariate but not on multivariate analysis.

Table 1

Non-curative

Curative

P value

Adjusted OR (95% CI)

Location

13(13.5%)

83(86.5%)

0.189

1.74(0.76–3.40)

Upper third

42(18.1%)

190(81.9%)

0.007

2.33(1.26–4.31)

Middle

27(7.9%)

313(92.1%)

1

Lower

Size

0–20mm

29(6.3%)

429(93.7%)

1

21–30mm

36(24.3%)

112(75.7%)

0.001

2.69(1.48–4.89)

>=31mm

17(27.4%)

45(72.6%)

<0.001

4.60(2.14–9.85)

Ulceration

Present

14(37.8%)

23(62.2%)

0.018

2.80(1.19–6.55)

Absent

67(11.9%)

494(88.1%)

1

Previous Histology

LGD

5(2.0%)

251(98.0%)

1

HGD

29(12.1%)

210(87.9%)

<0.001

6.12(2.24–16.70)

Carcinoma

47(32.4%)

98(67.6%)

<0.001

14.99(5.50–40.84)

Morphology

Depressed

53(17.0%)

258(83.0%)

0.049

1.99(1.00–3.95)

Protruded

13(18.1%)

59(81.9%)

0.042

2.53(1.03–6.19)

Flat

16(5.7%)

267(94.3%)

1

Conclusions Middle gastric location, size>20mm, presence of ulceration, HGD or Carcinoma in endoscopic biopsies on previous biopsies and protruded or depressed morphology are risk factors for NCR.



Publication History

Article published online:
14 April 2022

© 2022. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany