J Am Acad Audiol 2001; 12(02): 80-85
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1745583
Original Article

Aging and Contralateral Suppression Effects on Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions

Teralandur K. Parthasarathy
Department of Special Education and Communication Disorders, Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville, Edwardsville, Illinois
› Author Affiliations


Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) were recorded in 30 normal-hearing subjects to nonlinear clicks while continuous contralateral broadband noise (CBBN) was presented at 40, 50, 60, and 70 dB HL. Thirty subjects between 20 and 79 years were divided systematically into six-decade age groups, five subjects per group. All subjects in each group had hearing thresholds of 20 dB HL or better for the test frequencies from 0.25 to 8.0 kHz and normal acoustic immittance findings. The results provide evidence that contralateral suppression at varying levels of CBBN is interactive with age. Except for subjects in the age ranges between 60 and 69 and 70 and 79 years of age, an increase in CBBN from 40 to 70 dB in 10–dB steps resulted in an average increase in suppression from about 0.5 to 3.5 dB SPL. In addition, the contralateral suppression at 60 and 70 dB HL was significantly greater for subjects between 20 and 59 years of age than for subjects between 60 and 79 years of age.

Abbreviations: ANOVA = analysis of variance, CAP = compound action potential, CBBN = contralateral broadband noise, CNS = central nervous system, MOS = medial olivocochlear system, OAEs = otoacoustic emissions, OHCs = outer hair cells, TEOAEs = transient evoked otoacoustic emissions

Publication History

Article published online:
28 February 2022

© 2001. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA


  • Belal A, Stewart TJ. (1974). Pathological changes in the middle ear joints. Ann Otol 83:159–167.
  • Berlin CI, Hood LJ, Cecola RP, Jackson DF, Szabo P. (1993a). Does type I afferent neuron dysfunction reveal itself through lack of efferent suppression? Hear Res 65:40–50.
  • Berlin CI, Hood LJ, Wen H, Szabo P, Cecola RP, Rigby P, Jackson DF. (1993b). Contralateral suppression of nonlinear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 71:1–11.
  • Berlin CI, Hood LJ, Hurley A, Wen H, Kemp DT. (1995). Bilateral noise suppresses click-evoked otoacoustic emissions more than ipsilateral or contralateral noise. Hear Res 87:96–103.
  • Bonfils P, Bertrand Y, Uziel A. (1988). Evoked otoacoustic emissions: normative data and presbycusis. Audiology 27:27–35.
  • Brant LJ, Fozard JL. (1990). Age changes in pure-tone hearing thresholds in a longitudinal study of normal human aging. J Acoust Soc Am 88:813–820.
  • Brownell WE. (1990). Outer hair cell electromotility and otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 11:82–92.
  • Castor X, Veuillet E, Morgan A, Collet L. (1994). Influence of aging on active cochlear micromechanical properties and on the medial olivocochlear system in humans. Hear Res 77:1–8.
  • Collet L, Kemp DT, Veuillet E, Duclaux R, Moulin A, Morgon A. (1990). Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects. Hear Res 43:251–262.
  • Dorn PA, Piskorski P, Keefe DH, Neely ST. (1998). On the existence of an age/threshold/frequency interaction in distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 104:964–971.
  • Galambos R. (1956). Suppression of auditory nerve activity by stimulation of efferent fibers to cochlea. J Neurophysiol 19:424–437.
  • Hood LJ, Berlin CI, Hurley A, Cecola RP, Bell B. (1996). Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans: intensity effects. Hear Res 101:113–118.
  • Johnsson L, Hawkins JE. (1972). Sensory and neural degeneration with aging, as seen in microdissection of the human inner ear. Ear Hear 10:79–89.
  • Johnstone B, Patuzzi R, Yates GK. (1986). Basilar membrane measurements and the traveling wave. Hear Res 22:147–153.
  • Kemp DT. (1978). Stimulated acoustic emissions from the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 64:1386–1391.
  • Killion MC, Wilbur LA, Gudmundsen GI. (1985). Insert earphones for more interaural attenuation. Hear Instr 36:34–36.
  • Kim DO. (1984). Functional roles of the inner- and outer-hair cell sub-system in the cochlea and brainstem. In: Berlin CI, ed. Hearing Science: Recent Advances. San Diego: College-Hill, 241–262.
  • Kimberley BP, Hernadi I, Lee AM, Brown DK. (1994). Predicting pure tone thresholds in normal and hearing impaired ears with distortion product emission and age. Ear Hear 15:199–209.
  • Liberman M. (1989). Rapid assessment of sound-evoked olivocochlear feedback: suppression of compound action potential by contralateral sound. Hear Res 38:47–56.
  • Lonsbury-Martin BL, Cutler WN, Martin GK. (1991). Evidence for the influence of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 89:1749–1759.
  • Lonsbury-Martin BL, McCoy MJ, Whitehead ML, Martin GK. (1993). Clinical testing of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1:11–22.
  • Micheyl C, Collet L. (1996). Involvement of the olivocochlear bundle in the detection of tones in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 99:1604–1609.
  • Musiek F, Hoffman D. (1990). An introduction to the neu-rochemistry of the auditory system. Ear Hear 11:395–402.
  • Parthasarathy TK. (2000). In measuring transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in adults, is age a factor? Hear J 53:40–46.
  • Puel JL, Rebillard G. (1990). Effects of contralateral sound stimulation on the distortion product 2F1–F2: evidence that the medial efferent system is involved. J Acoust Soc Am 87:1630–1635.
  • Rasmussen GL. (1946). The olivary peduncle and other fiber projections of the superior olivary complex. J Comp Neurol 84:141–219.
  • Raza A, Arneric SP, Milbrandt JC, Caspary DM. (1994). Age-related changes in brainstem auditory neurotransmitters: measures of GABA and acetylcholine function. Hear Res 77:221–230.
  • Ruggero M, Rich NC. (1991). Application of a commercially manufactured doppler shift laser velocimeter to the measurement of basilar membrane vibration. Hear Res 51:215–230.
  • Ryan S, Kemp DT, Hinchcliffe R. (1991). The influence of contralateral acoustic stimulation on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans. Br J Audiol 25:391–397.
  • Strouse AL, Ochs MT, Hall JW. (1996). Evidence against the influence of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. J Am Acad Audiol 7:339–345.
  • Stover L, Norton SJ. (1993). The effects of aging on otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 94:2670–2681.
  • Veuillet E, Collet L, Duclaux R. (1991). Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables. J Neurophysiol 65:724–735.
  • Warren E, Liberman MC. (1989). Effects of contralateral sound on auditory-nerve response. II. Dependence on stimulus variables. Hear Res 37:105–122.
  • Wen H, Berlin CI, Hood LJ, Jackson DF, Hurley A. (1993). A program for the quantification and analysis of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Abstr Assoc Res Otolaryngol 16:102.
  • Williams EA, Brookes GB, Prasher DK. (1994). Effects of olivocochlear bundle section on otoacoustic emissions in humans: efferent effects in comparison with control subjects. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 114:121–129.
  • Willot JF. (1996). Anatomic and physiologic aging: a behavioral neuroscience perspective. J Am Acad Audiol 7:141–151.
  • Wright JL, Schuknecht HF. (1972). Atrophy of the spiral ligament. Arch Otolaryngol 96:16–21.
  • Zhang S, Oertel D. (1994). Neuronal circuits associated with the output of the dorsal cochlear nucleus through fusiform cells. J Neurophysiol 71:914–930.
  • Zurek PM. (1985). Acoustic emissions from the ear: a summary of results from humans and animals. J Acoust Soc Am 78:340–344.