RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748838
New Use of an Absorbable Adhesion Barrier (INTERCEED) for Temporary Diverting Ileostomy in Minimally Invasive Rectal Surgery
Autoren
Funding The authors received no specific funding for the present article.
Abstract
Objectives Sometimes, severe adhesion occurs between the rectus abdominis muscle and the ileal intestinal limbs after temporary diverting ileostomy. This can make ileostomy reversal difficult. The aim of the present study is to assess whether absorbable adhesion barrier made of oxidized regenerated cellulose (INTERCEED) could contribute to improved surgical outcomes in stoma reversal.
Methods This was a single-institutional retrospective study. A total of 36 consecutive patients who underwent ileostomy reversal by a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. INTERCEED was inserted between the ileal limbs and the rectus abdominis muscle at the time of ileostomy creation in 12 patients. Surgical outcomes of the ileostomy reversal were compared between patients treated with and without INTERCEED.
Results The degree of adhesion formation between the ileal limbs and the rectus abdominis muscles, operating time, and estimated blood loss were significantly reduced in patients treated with INTERCEED compared with those treated by the conventional approach. None of the patients in the INTERCEED group had postoperative complications after the initial surgery and ileostomy reversal.
Conclusions INTERCEED is suitable for insertion between the ileal limbs and the rectus abdominis muscles because of its softness and flexibility. The use of INTERCEED for diverting ileostomy contributes to reduced adhesion formation, operative time, and blood loss in patients, and further research is needed to confirm our results.
Contributions to the Submitted Work
Nagasaki T. designed the study and analyzed the data. All coauthors substantially contributed to the present study and fulfilled the requirements for authorship according to the guidelines of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
Ethics
Approval code issued by the institutional review board; protocol no. 2020-GA-1051
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 12. Oktober 2021
Angenommen: 19. November 2021
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. Juni 2022
© 2022. Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
- 
            
References
 - 1 Akiyoshi T, Ueno M, Fukunaga Y. et al. Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer. Am J Surg 2011; 202 (03) 259-264
 - 2 Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Simert G, Sjödahl R. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2007; 246 (02) 207-214
 - 3 Schneider V, Lee LD, Stroux A, Buhr HJ, Ritz JP, Kreis ME. et al. Risk factors for reoperation after ileostomy reversal - Results from a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2016; 36 (Pt A): 233-9
 - 4 Tang CL, Seow-Choen F, Fook-Chong S, Eu KW. Bioresorbable adhesion barrier facilitates early closure of the defunctioning ileostomy after rectal excision: a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46 (09) 1200-1207
 - 5 Kusunoki M, Ikeuchi H, Yanagi H. et al. Bioresorbable hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose membrane (Seprafilm) in surgery for rectal carcinoma: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Surg Today 2005; 35 (11) 940-945
 - 6 Salum M, Wexner SD, Nogueras JJ. et al; Program Directors Association in Colon and Rectal Surgery. Does sodium hyaluronate- and carboxymethylcellulose-based bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm) decrease operative time for loop ileostomy closure?. Tech Coloproctol 2006; 10 (03) 187-190 , discussion 190–191
 - 7 Hu J, Fan D, Lin X. et al. Safety and Efficacy of Sodium Hyaluronate Gel and Chitosan in Preventing Postoperative Peristomal Adhesions After Defunctioning Enterostomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94 (51) e2354
 - 8 Kawamura YJ, Kakizawa N, Tan KY. et al. Sushi-roll wrap of Seprafilm for ileostomy limbs facilitates ileostomy closure. Tech Coloproctol 2009; 13 (03) 211-214
 - 9 Hsu CW, Chang MC, Wang JH, Wu CC, Chen YH. Placement of SurgiWrap® adhesion barrier film around the protective loop stoma after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery may reduce the peristomal adhesion severity and facilitate the closure. Int J Colorectal Dis 2019; 34 (03) 513-518
 - 10 Tjandra JJ, Chan MK. A sprayable hydrogel adhesion barrier facilitates closure of defunctioning loop ileostomy: a randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51 (06) 956-960
 - 11 Rajab TK, Kimonis KO, Ali E, Offodile II AC, Brady M, Bleday R. Practical implications of postoperative adhesions for preoperative consent and operative technique. Int J Surg 2013; 11 (09) 753-756
 - 12 Nagasaki T, Akiyoshi T, Fujimoto Y. et al. Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Might Improve the Prognosis of Patients with Locally Advanced Low Rectal Cancer and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Metastases. World J Surg 2017; 41 (03) 876-883
 - 13 Konishi T, Shinozaki E, Murofushi K. et al. Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy, and Laparoscopic Surgery with Selective Lateral Node Dissection for Poor-Risk Low Rectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26 (08) 2507-2513
 - 14 Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M. et al. Safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer with preoperative chemoradiation therapy. J Gastrointest Surg 2009; 13 (03) 521-525
 - 15 Onaitis MW, Noone RB, Hartwig M. et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer: analysis of clinical outcomes from a 13-year institutional experience. Ann Surg 2001; 233 (06) 778-785
 - 16 Garlipp B, Ptok H, Schmidt U, Meyer F, Gastinger I, Lippert H. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma: effects on anastomotic leak rate and postoperative bladder dysfunction after non-emergency sphincter-preserving anterior rectal resection. Results of the Quality Assurance in Rectal Cancer Surgery multicenter observational trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2010; 395 (08) 1031-1038
 - 17 Akiyoshi T, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T. et al. Complications of loop ileostomy closure in patients with rectal tumor. World J Surg 2010; 34 (08) 1937-1942
 - 18 Keller DS, Khorgami Z, Swendseid B, Khan S, Delaney CP. Identifying causes for high readmission rates after stoma reversal. Surg Endosc 2014; 28 (04) 1263-1268
 - 19 Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, Jeyarajah S, Zacharakis E, Purkayastha S. The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24 (06) 711-723
 - 20 Sharma A, Deeb AP, Rickles AS, Iannuzzi JC, Monson JR, Fleming FJ. Closure of defunctioning loop ileostomy is associated with considerable morbidity. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15 (04) 458-462
 - 21 Kaiser AM, Israelit S, Klaristenfeld D. et al. Morbidity of ostomy takedown. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12 (03) 437-441
 - 22 Man VC, Choi HK, Law WL, Foo DC. Morbidities after closure of ileostomy: analysis of risk factors. Int J Colorectal Dis 2016; 31 (01) 51-57
 - 23 Krebs B, Ivanecz A, Potrc S, Horvat M. Factors affecting the morbidity and mortality of diverting stoma closure: retrospective cohort analysis of twelve-year period. Radiol Oncol 2019; 53 (03) 331-336
 - 24 Mansfield SD, Jensen C, Phair AS, Kelly OT, Kelly SB. Complications of loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective cohort analysis of 123 patients. World J Surg 2008; 32 (09) 2101-2106
 - 25 Jeong WK, Park JW, Choi HS, Jeong SY, Oh JH. Comparison of peristomal adhesion formation between laparoscopic and open low anterior resection of rectal cancer. World J Surg 2013; 37 (11) 2683-2687
 - 26 Huang C, Ding DC. Outcomes of adhesion barriers in gynecologic surgeries: A retrospective study at a medical center. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98 (50) e18391
 - 27 Davey AK, Maher PJ. Surgical adhesions: a timely update, a great challenge for the future. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007; 14 (01) 15-22
 - 28 González-Quintero VH, Cruz-Pachano FE. Preventing adhesions in obstetric and gynecologic surgical procedures. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2009; 2 (01) 38-45
 - 29 Naito M, Ogura N, Yamanashi T. et al. Prospective randomized controlled study on the validity and safety of an absorbable adhesion barrier (Interceed®) made of oxidized regenerated cellulose for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Asian J Endosc Surg 2017; 10 (01) 7-11
 - 30 Ordoñez JL, Domínguez J, Evrard V, Koninckx PR. The effect of training and duration of surgery on adhesion formation in the rabbit model. Hum Reprod 1997; 12 (12) 2654-2657
 
    
      
        
      
    