Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU 2023; 13(03): 365-372
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1755584
Original Article

Are Clinical Pilates Exercises an Effective Treatment for Scoliosis? A Randomized Clinical Trial

Ceren Başaran Özden 
1   Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Tuğba Kuru Çolak 
2   Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Marmara University, Faculty of Healthy Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives The aim of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of clinical Pilates exercises in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

Materials and Methods The study included patients aged 15 to 30 years with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Patients were randomly separated into the following two groups: the clinical Pilates exercise group (n = 16) and the control group (n = 18). The clinical Pilates exercise group received 16 sessions of exercise. Angle of trunk rotation (scoliometer), sagittal plane alignment of the spine (inclinometer), posture (PostureScreen Mobile program), quality of life (Scoliosis Research Society-23), pain (Numerical Pain scale), and cosmetic deformity perceptions (spinal appearance questionnaire) were assessed twice.

Statistical Analysis Data obtained in the study were analyzed statistically using IBM, SPSS v. 22 software. The Shapiro–Wilks test was used to assess the conformity of data to normal distribution. In the group comparisons of angle of rotation, kyphosis and lordosis angle, and anterior shift values obtained at baseline and in the 8th week, the independent sample t-test were applied to variables with normal distribution, and the Mann–Whitney U test to variables not showing normal distribution.

Results The change in the pain score from baseline to 8 weeks was determined to be significantly superior in the Pilates group (p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was determined between the groups in respect of the amount of change in the side shift and tilt measurements in the posture evaluation, with superior improvement seen in the Pilates exercise group(p < 0.005).

Conclusions The results of this study showed that Pilates exercises did not have a significant effect on deformity, quality of life, and perception of deformity in scoliosis, but significantly reduced back and low back pain and contributed to improvements in posture.

Keywords

adolescent - exercise - scoliosis - rehabilitation

Ethics Approval

Approval for the study was granted by the Ethics Committee of Marmara University, Faculty of Medicine. All procedures were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.


Informed Consent

Informed written consent by parents and patients has been obtained. We followed the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist for the randomized clinical trials.




Publication History

Article published online:
04 October 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Moramarco M, Borsysov M, Ng SY, Weiss HR. Schroth's Textbook of scoliosis and other spinal deformities. Newcastle UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2020
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Berdishevsky H, Lebel VA, Bettany-Saltikov J. et al. Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review of seven major schools. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016; 11: 20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Burger M, Coetzee W, du Plessis LZ. et al. The effectiveness of Schroth exercises in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. S Afr J Physiother 2019; 75 (01) 904
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Monticone M, Ambrosini E, Cazzaniga D, Rocca B, Ferrante S. Active self-correction and task-oriented exercises reduce spinal deformity and improve quality of life in subjects with mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Results of a randomised controlled trial. Eur Spine J 2014; 23 (06) 1204-1214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Blum CL. Chiropractic and pilates therapy for the treatment of adult scoliosis. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2002; 25 (04) E3
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Solberg G. Postural Disorders and Musculoskelatal Dysfunction. Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment. 2n ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Muscolino JE, Cipriani S. Pilates and the “powerhouse”—I. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2004; 8 (01) 15-24
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Byrnes K, Wu PJ, Whillier S. Is Pilates an effective rehabilitation tool? A systematic review. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2018; 22 (01) 192-202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hornsby E, Johnston LM. Effect of Pilates intervention on physical function of children and youth: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2020; 101 (02) 317-328
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Campos RR, Dias JM, Pereira LM. et al. Effect of the Pilates method on physical conditioning of healthy subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2016; 56 (7-8): 864-873
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Eliks M, Zgorzalewicz-Stachowiak M, Zeńczak-Praga K. Application of Pilates-based exercises in the treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain: state of the art. Postgrad Med J 2019; 95 (1119): 41-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Emery K, De Serres SJ, McMillan A, Côté JN. The effects of a Pilates training program on arm-trunk posture and movement. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2010; 25 (02) 124-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Alves de Araújo ME, Bezerra da Silva E, Bragade Mello D, Cader SA, Shiguemi Inoue Salgado A, Dantas EH. The effectiveness of the Pilates method: reducing the degree of non-structural scoliosis, and improving flexibility and pain in female college students. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2012; 16 (02) 191-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kim G, HwangBo PN. Effects of Schroth and Pilates exercises on the Cobb angle and weight distribution of patients with scoliosis. J Phys Ther Sci 2016; 28 (03) 1012-1015
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 HwangBo PN. Psychological and physical effects of Schroth and Pilates exercise on female high school students with idiopathic scoliosis. J Kor Phys Ther 2016; 28 (06) 364-368
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Scoliosis Research Society. Definitions & Causes. Accessed 20 May 2021 at: https://www.srs.org/patients-and-families/common-questions-and-glossary/frequently-asked-questions/general-spinal-deformity-faqs
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Research Randomizer. Accessed September 6, 2019 at: http://www.randomizer.org/
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Amendt LE, Ause-Ellias KL, Eybers JL, Wadsworth CT, Nielsen DH, Weinstein SL. Validity and reliability testing of the scoliometer. Phys Ther 1990; 70 (02) 108-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hopkins BB, Vehrs PR, Fellingham GW, George JD, Hager R, Ridge ST. Validity and reliability of standing posture measurements using a mobile application. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2019; 42 (02) 132-140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Szucs KA, Brown EVD. Rater reliability and construct validity of a mobile application for posture analysis. J Phys Ther Sci 2018; 30 (01) 31-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Salamh PA, Kolber M. The reliability, minimal detectable change and concurrent validity of a gravity-based bubble inclinometer and iphone application for measuring standing lumbar lordosis. Physiother Theory Pract 2014; 30 (01) 62-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Scoliosis Research Society. SRS-23 scale. Accessed June 15, 2019 at: https://www.srs.org/professionals/online-education-and-resources/patient-outcome-questionnaires
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Carreon LY, Sanders JO, Diab M, Polly DW, Diamond BE, Sucato DJ. Discriminative properties of the spinal appearance questionnaire compared with the Scoliosis Research Society–22 Revised. Spine Deform 2013; 1 (05) 328-338
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Ferreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain 2011; 152 (10) 2399-2404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Isacowitz R, Clippinger K. Pilates Anatomy. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2020
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Coelho DM, Bonagamba GH, Oliveira AS. Scoliometer measurements of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Braz J Phys Ther 2013; 17 (02) 179-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Samuelsson L, Norén L. Trunk rotation in scoliosis. The influence of curve type and direction in 150 children. Acta Orthop Scand 1997; 68 (03) 273-276
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Rrecaj-Malaj S, Beqaj S, Krasniqi V, Qorolli M, Tufekcievski A. Outcome of 24 weeks of combined Schroth and Pilates exercises on Cobb angle, angle of trunk rotation, chest expansion, flexibility and quality of life in adolescents with idiopathic acoliosis. Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2020; 26: e920449
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Moore K. The effects of mat pilates on weight-bearing symmetry, balance, and respiratory function in a young woman with scoliosis. JYP 2019; 8 (01) 10-22
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Weiss HR, Negrini S, Rigo M. et al. SOSORT guideline committee. Indications for conservative management of scoliosis (guidelines). Scoliosis 2006; 1: 5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar