Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756326
Pipkin Type-II Femoral Head Fracture – A Biomechanical Evaluation by the Finite-Element Method[*]
Article in several languages: português | English
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the biomechanical capacity of two forms of fixation for Pipkin type-II fractures, describing the vertical fracture deviation, the maximum and minimum principal stresses, and the Von Mises equivalent stress in the syntheses used.
Materials and Methods Two internal fasteners were developed to treat Pipkin type-II fractures through finite elements: a 3.5-mm cortical screw and a Herbert screw. Under the same conditions, the vertical fracture deviation, the maximum and minimum principal stresses, and the Von Mises equivalent stress in the syntheses used were evaluated.
Results The vertical displacements evaluated were of 1.5 mm and 0.5 mm. The maximum principal stress values obtained in the upper region of the femoral neck were of 9.7 KPa and 1.3 Kpa, and the minimum principal stress values obtained in the lower region of the femoral neck were of -8.7 KPa and -9.3 KPa. Finally, the peak values for Von Mises stress were of 7.2 GPa and 2.0 GPa for the fixation models with the use of the 3.5-mm cortical screw and the Herbert screw respectively.
Conclusion The fixation system with the Herbert screw generated the best results in terms of reduction of vertical displacement, distribution of the maximum principal stress, and the peak Von Mises equivalent stress, demonstrating mechanical superiority compared to that of the 3.5-mm cortical screw in the treatment of Pipkin type-II fractures.
Financial Support
The authors declare that they have received no financial support from public, commercial, or non-profit sources pertaining to the conduction of the present study.
* Work developed at Instituto de Pesquisa e Ensino, Hospital Ortopédico e Medicina Especializada (IPE-HOME), Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Publication History
Received: 16 January 2022
Accepted: 26 July 2022
Article published online:
03 October 2022
© 2022. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
Referências
- 1
Butler JE.
Pipkin Type-II fractures of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981; 63 (08) 1292-1296
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Uzel AP,
Laflamme GY,
Rouvillain JL.
Irreducible Pipkin II femoral head fractures: Is transgluteal approach the best strategy?.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010; 96 (06) 695-701
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Wang CG,
Li YM,
Zhang HF,
Li H,
Li ZJ.
Anterior approach versus posterior approach for Pipkin I and II femoral head fractures:
A systemic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2016; 27: 176-181
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Romeo NM,
Firoozabadi R.
Classifications in Brief: The Pipkin Classification of Femoral Head Fractures. Clin
Orthop Relat Res 2018; 476 (05) 1114-1119
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Giannoudis PV,
Kontakis G,
Christoforakis Z,
Akula M,
Tosounidis T,
Koutras C.
Management, complications and clinical results of femoral head fractures. Injury 2009;
40 (12) 1245-1251
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Pipkin G.
Treatment of grade IV fracture-dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1957;
39-A (05) 1027-1042 , passim
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Kim JW,
Kim JH.
Updates on Treatment of Femoral Head Fractures. J Korean Orthop Assoc 2015; 50 (03)
171-177
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Zaizi A,
Benomar HA,
Fekhaoui MR,
Grimi T,
Boufettal M,
Berrada MS.
Bilateral posterior hip dislocation associated with right Pipkin II fracture: A case
report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2019; 61: 103-106
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Scolaro JA,
Marecek G,
Firoozabadi R,
Krieg JC,
Routt MLC.
Management and radiographic outcomes of femoral head fractures. J Orthop Traumatol
2017; 18 (03) 235-241
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Murray P,
McGee HM,
Mulvihill N.
Fixation of femoral head fractures using the Herbert screw. Injury 1988; 19 (03) 220-221
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Wang J,
Cai L,
Xie L,
Chen H,
Guo X,
Yu K.
3D printing-based Ganz approach for treatment of femoral head fractures: a prospective
analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2019; 14 (01) 338
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Stannard JP,
Harris HW,
Volgas DA,
Alonso JE.
Functional outcome of patients with femoral head fractures associated with hip dislocations.
Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; (377) 44-56
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Samsami S,
Saberi S,
Sadighi S,
Rouhi G.
Comparison of Three Fixation Methods for Femoral Neck Fracture in Young Adults: Experimental
and Numerical Investigations. J Med Biol Eng 2015; 35 (05) 566-579
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Noda M,
Saegusa Y,
Takahashi M,
Tezuka D,
Adachi K,
Naoi K.
Biomechanical Study Using the Finite Element Method of Internal Fixation in Pauwels
Type III Vertical Femoral Neck Fractures. Arch Trauma Res 2015; 4 (03) e23167
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Radcliffe IA,
Taylor M.
Investigation into the effect of varus-valgus orientation on load transfer in the
resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol,
Avon) 2007; 22 (07) 780-786
MissingFormLabel