RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1759630
Comparison of the Effects of GMCSF-Containing and Traditional Culture Media on Embryo Development and Pregnancy Success Rates

Abstract
Objective The use of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-containing medium, which is a commercial medium that is used for cultivation of embryos in in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments, has been suggested to increase the efficiency of this procedure in patients with previous multiple unsuccessful attempts. In this retrospective study, we analyzed GM-CSF-containing embryo culture media compared with traditional culture media in terms of development of embryos, pregnancy, and ongoing pregnancy success and live birth rates.
Methods This is a prospective case control study conducted in a single center. A total of 131 unexplained infertility patients were included in the study. A cohort of 69 patients whose embryos were cultured in GM-CSF-containing medium and a control group of 62 age-matched patients whose embryos were cultured in conventional Sage One Step medium were included in the study. The major study outcomes were achievement of pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rate at 12 weeks of gestation.
Results The pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates of the patients whose embryos were cultured in GM-CSF-containing medium were 39.13% and 36.23%, respectively. These were higher than the rates of the control group, which were 30.65% and 29.03%, respectively, although this difference was not statistically significant. In addition, the 5th-day embryo transfer percentage in the GM-CSF group was higher than in the control group (34.78% versus 27.4%).
Conclusion The main findings of our study were that there was no difference between the GM-CSF-enhanced medium and the control group in terms of our major study outcomes. However, blastomere inequality rate and embryo fragmentation rates were lower in the GM-CSF group.
Keywords
in vitro fertilization - embryo culture - embryo transfer - granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factorContributions
All authors participated in the concept and design of the present study; analysis and interpretation of data; draft or revision of the manuscript, and they have approved the manuscript as submitted. All authors are responsible for the reported research.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 02. Januar 2022
Angenommen: 09. September 2022
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
29. Dezember 2022
© 2022. Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
References
- 1 Simon A, Laufer N. Assessment and treatment of repeated implantation failure (RIF). J Assist Reprod Genet 2012; 29 (11) 1227-1239
- 2 Donaghay M, Lessey BA. Uterine receptivity: alterations associated with benign gynecological disease. Semin Reprod Med 2007; 25 (06) 461-475
- 3 Laird SM, Tuckerman EM, Li TC. Cytokine expression in the endometrium of women with implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 13 (01) 13-23
- 4 Robertson SA. GM-CSF regulation of embryo development and pregnancy. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2007; 18 (3-4): 287-298
- 5 Segerer S, Kammerer U, Kapp M, Dietl J, Rieger L. Upregulation of chemokine and cytokine production during pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2009; 67 (03) 145-150
- 6 Chronopoulou E, Harper JC. IVF culture media: past, present and future. Hum Reprod Update 2015; 21 (01) 39-55
- 7 Dumoulin JC, Land JA, Van Montfoort AP, Nelissen EC, Coonen E, Derhaag JG. et al. Effect of in vitro culture of human embryos on birthweight of newborns. Hum Reprod 2010; 25 (03) 605-612
- 8 Hansen PJ, Dobbs KB, Denicol AC. Programming of the preimplantation embryo by the embryokine colony stimulating factor 2. Anim Reprod Sci 2014; 149 (1-2): 59-66
- 9 Kawamura K, Chen Y, Shu Y, Cheng T, Qiao J, Behr B. et al. Promotion of human early embryonic development and blastocyst outgrowth in vitro using autocrine/paracrine growth factors. PLoS One 2012; 7 (11) e49328
- 10 Kwak SS, Jeung SH, Biswas D, Jeon YB, Hyun SH. Effects of porcine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on porcine in vitro-fertilized embryos. Theriogenology 2012; 77 (06) 1186-1197
- 11 Das M, Holzer HE. Recurrent implantation failure: gamete and embryo factors. Fertil Steril 2012; 97 (05) 1021-1027
- 12 Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C, Webb S. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 2002; 346 (10) 725-730
- 13 Agarwal A, Durairajanayagam D, du Plessis SS. Utility of antioxidants during assisted reproductive techniques: an evidence based review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014; 12: 112
- 14 Binder NK, Evans J, Gardner DK, Salamonsen LA, Hannan NJ. Endometrial signals improve embryo outcome: functional role of vascular endothelial growth factor isoforms on embryo development and implantation in mice. Hum Reprod 2014; 29 (10) 2278-2286
- 15 Colazingari S, Fiorenza MT, Carlomagno G, Najjar R, Bevilacqua A. Improvement of mouse embryo quality by myo-inositol supplementation of IVF media. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014; 31 (04) 463-469
- 16 Sjöblom C, Wikland M, Robertson SA. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor promotes human blastocyst development in vitro. Hum Reprod 1999; 14 (12) 3069-3076
- 17 Giacomini G, Tabibzadeh SS, Satyaswaroop PG, Bonsi L, Vitale L, Bagnara GP. et al. Epithelial cells are the major source of biologically active granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor in human endometrium. Hum Reprod 1995; 10 (12) 3259-3263
- 18 Agerholm I, Loft A, Hald F, Lemmen JG, Munding B, Sørensen PD, Ziebe S. Culture of human oocytes with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor has no effect on embryonic chromosomal constitution. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 20 (04) 477-484
- 19 Imakawa K, Carlson KD, McGuire WJ, Christenson RK, Taylor A. Enhancement of ovine trophoblast interferon by granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor: possible involvement of protein kinase C. J Mol Endocrinol 1997; 19 (02) 121-130
- 20 Robertson SA, Sjöblom C, Jasper MJ, Norman RJ, Seamark RF. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor promotes glucose transport and blastomere viability in murine preimplantation embryos. Biol Reprod 2001; 64 (04) 1206-1215
- 21 Sfontouris IA, Lainas GT, Anagnostara K, Kolibianakis EM, Lainas TG. Effect of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) on pregnancy rates in patients with multiple unsuccessful IVF attempts. Hum Reprod 2013; 28 (Suppl 1): i62
- 22 Sjöblom C, Roberts CT, Wikland M, Robertson SA. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor alleviates adverse consequences of embryo culture on fetal growth trajectory and placental morphogenesis. Endocrinology 2005; 146 (05) 2142-2153
- 23 Perricone R, De Carolis C, Giacomelli R, Guarino MD, De Sanctis G, Fontana L. GM-CSF and pregnancy: evidence of significantly reduced blood concentrations in unexplained recurrent abortion efficiently reverted by intravenous immunoglobulin treatment. Am J Reprod Immunol 2003; 50 (03) 232-237
- 24 Mignini Renzini M, Dal Canto M, Coticchio G. et al. Clinical efficiency and perinatal outcome of ART cycles following embryo culture in the presence of GM-CSF in patients with miscarriage or early pregnancy loss history. Hum Reprod 2013; 28 (Suppl 1): i160-i202
- 25 Siristatidis C, Vogiatzi P, Salamalekis G, Creatsa M, Vrachnis N, Glujovsky D. et al. Granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor supplementation in culture media for subfertile women undergoing assisted reproduction technologies: a systematic review. Int J Endocrinol 2013; 2013: 704967
- 26 Ziebe S, Loft A, Povlsen BB, Erb K, Agerholm I, Aasted M. et al. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in embryo culture medium for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2013; 99 (06) 1600-1609
- 27 Cutting R, Morroll D, Roberts SA, Pickering S, Rutherford A. BFS and ACE. Elective single embryo transfer: guidelines for practice British Fertility Society and Association of Clinical Embryologists. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2008; 11 (03) 131-146
- 28 Tevkin S, Lokshin V, Shishimorova M, Polumiskov V. The frequency of clinical pregnancy and implantation rate after cultivation of embryos in a medium with granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in patients with preceding failed attempts of ART. Gynecol Endocrinol 2014; 30 (Suppl 1): 9-12