Symptomatic isolated terminal ileal ulcers: etiology and clinical significance

Abstract

Background With an increasing number of ileal intubations, isolated terminal ileal ulcers (ITIU) are frequently found during colonoscopies. The present study aimed at studying the etiology and clinical significance of these ulcers in patients having gastrointestinal symptoms.

Methods This was a prospective observational study performed on consecutive patients who underwent ileocolonoscopy for various gastrointestinal symptoms between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2014. Clinical, endoscopic, and histological findings of patients with ITIUs were assessed to determine the etiology and they were treated accordingly. Symptom resolution was assessed within 3 – 6 months of initial diagnosis, and colonoscopy was repeated for consenting patients.

Results Among 74 (4.9 %) of 1497 patients who had ITIUs on ileocolonoscopy, 41 (55.4 %) had specific etiologies on initial testing. After 3 – 6 months follow-up, definitive diagnosis was ascertained in 44 (59.5 %) patients [Crohn’s disease (CD): 19 (25.7 %), NSAID-induced ulcers: 11 (14.9 %), intestinal tuberculosis (ITB): 9 (12.2 %), and eosinophilic enteritis: 5 (6.8 %)], and 30 patients (40.5 %) had nonspecific ulcers. After treatment, symptomatic and endoscopic resolution were noted in 55/60 patients (91.7 %) and 28/36 patients (77.8 %), respectively. Of 5/60 patients who remained symptomatic, three were initially diagnosed with nonspecific ulcers and two with CD, and they were finally diagnosed with CD and ITB respectively, and treated accordingly.

Conclusions In patients with gastrointestinal symptoms, more than half of the ITIUs have specific etiologies, and timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment can prevent serious complications. Nonspecific ulcers can be managed with symptomatic treatment, but need close monitoring and re-evaluation in the case of persistence of symptoms.

• References

• 1 Shah RJ, Fenoglio-Preiser C, Bleau BL. et al. Usefulness of colonoscopy with biopsy in the evaluation of patients with chronic diarrhea. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 1091-1095
• 2 Börsch DG, Schmidt G. Endoscopy of the terminal ileum. Dis Colon Rectum 1985; 28: 499-501
• 3 Yusoff IF, Ormonde DG, Hoffman NE. Routine colonic mucosal biopsy and ileoscopy increases diagnostic yield in patients undergoing colonoscopy for diarrhea. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002; 17: 276-280
• 4 Chang H-S, Lee D, Kim JC. et al. Isolated terminal ileal ulcerations in asymptomatic individuals: natural course and clinical significance. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 1226-1232
• 5 Courville EL, Siegel CA, Vay T. et al. Isolated asymptomatic ileitis does not progress to overt Crohn disease on long-term follow-up despite features of chronicity in ileal biopsies. Am J Surg Pathol 2009; 33: 1341-1347
• 6 dos Santos CHM. Ileal ulcer in asymptomatic individuals. Is this Crohn?. J Coloproctol 2012; 32: 119-122
• 7 Kedia S, Kurrey L, Pratap Mouli V. et al. Frequency, natural course and clinical significance of symptomatic terminal ileitis. J Dig Dis 2016; 17: 36-43
• 8 Jeong SH, Lee KJ, Kim YB. et al. Diagnostic value of terminal ileum intubation during colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 23: 51-55
• 9 Cherian S, Singh P. Is routine ileoscopy useful? An observational study of procedure times, diagnostic yield, and learning curve. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 2324-2329
• 10 Amarapurkar DN, Patel ND, Amarapurkar AD. et al. Tissue polymerase chain reaction in diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis and Crohn’s disease. J Assoc Physicians India 2004; 52: 863-867
• 11 Wang W, Wang Z, Yang Y. et al. Long-term follow-up of nonspecific small bowel ulcers with a benign course and no requirement for surgery: is this a distinct group?. BMC Gastroenterol 2011; 11: 51
• 12 Atkinson RJ, Save V, Hunter JO. Colonic ulceration after sodium phosphate bowel preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 2603-2605
• 13 Hixson LJ. Colorectal ulcers associated with sodium phosphate catharsis. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 101-102
• 14 Zwas FR, Cirillo NW, el Serag HB. et al. Colonic mucosal abnormalities associated with oral sodium phosphate solution. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 43: 463-466
• 15 Waugh N, Cummins E, Royle P. et al. Faecal calprotectin testing for differentiating amongst inflammatory and non-inflammatory bowel diseases: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess Winch Engl 2013; 17: XV-XIX
• 16 Larsson G, Shenoy KT, Ramasubramanian R. et al. High faecal calprotectin levels in intestinal tuberculosis are associated with granulomas in intestinal biopsies. Infect Dis Lond Engl 2015; 47: 137-143
• 17 Kane SV, Sandborn WJ, Rufo PA. et al. Fecal lactoferrin is a sensitive and specific marker in identifying intestinal inflammation. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 1309-1314
• 18 Van Assche G, Dignass A, Panes J. et al. European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO). The second European evidence-based Consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease: Definitions and diagnosis. J Crohns Colitis 2010; 4: 7-27
• 19 Munot K, Ananthakrishnan AN, Singla V. et al. Response to trial of antitubercular therapy in patients with ulceroconstrictive intestinal disease and an eventual diagnosis of Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: S159
• 20 Logan VS. Anorectal tuberculosis. Proc R Soc Med 1969; 62: 1227-1230
• 21 Paustian F. Tuberculosis of the intestine. In: Bockus HL. , ed. Bockus gastroenterology. 5th. edn. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1995: 3304
• 22 Hayashi Y, Yamamoto H, Taguchi H. et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced small-bowel lesions identified by double-balloon endoscopy: endoscopic features of the lesions and endoscopic treatments for diaphragm disease. J Gastroenterol 2009; 44 (Suppl. 19) 57-63
• 23 Lee M, Hodges WG, Huggins TL. et al. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis. South Med J 1996; 89: 189-194
• 24 Lee CM, Changchien CS, Chen PC. et al. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis: 10 years experience. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88: 70-74