Die Bedeutung randomisierter kontrollierter Studien für die Chirurgie Beispiel Bauchdeckenverschluss

• Literatur

• 1 Seidel D, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA. Treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment after surgery without fascial dehiscence by vacuum assisted closure™ (SAWHI-VAC®-study) versus standard conventional wound therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2013; 14: 394
• 2 Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JM. et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isnʼt. BMJ 1996; 312: 71-72
• 3 Diener MK, Knebel P, Fink C. et al. [Clinical trials in surgery. On the way towards evidence-based surgery]. Chirurg 2012; 83: 315-318
• 4 McLeod RS. Issues in surgical randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 1999; 23: 1210-1214
• 5 Howes N, Chagla L, Thorpe M. et al. Surgical practice is evidence based. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 1220-1223
• 6 Uhl W, Wente M, Büchler M. Chirurgisch-klinische Studien in der praktischen Durchführung. Chirurg 2000; 71: 615-625
• 7 Wolff RF, Reinders S, Barth M. et al. Distribution of country of origin in studies used in Cochrane reviews. PloS One 2011; 6: e18798
• 8 Wenner DM, Brody BA, Jarman AF. et al. Do surgical trials meet the scientific standards for clinical trials?. J Am Coll Surg 2012; 215: 722-730
• 9 Fink C, Keck T, Rossion I. et al. Beitrag des Studienzentrums der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie zur evidenzbasierten Chirurgie. Chirurg 2011; 82: 1109-1115
• 10 Knaebel HP, Diener MK, Wente MN. et al. The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society—rationale and current status. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2005; 390: 171-177
• 11 Israelsson LA, Jonsson T. Incisional hernia after midline laparotomy: a prospective study. Eur J Surg 1996; 162: 125-129
• 12 Luijendijk RW, Lemmen MH, Hop WC. et al. Incisional hernia recurrence following “vest-over-pants” or vertical Mayo repair of primary hernias of the midline. World J Surg 1997; 21: 62-66
• 13 van ʼt Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J. et al. Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 1350-1356
• 14 Seiler CM, Bruckner T, Diener MK. et al. Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial (INSECT: ISRCTN24023541). Ann Surg 2009; 249: 576-582
• 15 Rahbari NN, Knebel P, Diener MK. et al. Current practice of abdominal wall closure in elective surgery – Is there any consensus?. BMC Surg 2009; 9: 8
• 16 Diener MK, Voss S, Jensen K. et al. Elective midline laparotomy closure: the INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2010; 251: 843-856
• 17 Millbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 2009; 144: 1056-1059
• 18 Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW. et al. Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 386: 1254-1260
• 19 Fassiadis N, Roidl M, Hennig M. et al. Randomized clinical trial of vertical or transverse laparotomy for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 1208-1211
• 20 Currò G, Centorrino T, Musolino C. et al. Incisional hernia prophylaxis in morbidly obese patients undergoing biliopancreatic diversion. Obes Surg 2011; 21: 1559-1563
• 21 Nieuwenhuizen J, Eker HH, Timmermans L. et al. A double blind randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture closure with mesh augmented closure to reduce incisional hernia incidence. BMC Surg 2013; 13: 48
• 22 Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K. et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia 2015; 19: 1-24
• 23 Statistisches Bundesamt, Außenstelle Bonn. Fallpauschalenbezogene Krankenhausstatistik (DRG-Statistik) Operationen und Prozeduren der vollstationären Patientinnen und Patienten in Krankenhäusern – Ausführliche Darstellung. Bonn: Statistisches Bundesamt; 2015