Rofo 2017; 189(07): 632-639
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-107239
Abdomen
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Visceral Artery Aneurysms and Pseudoaneurysms: Retrospective Analysis of Interventional Endovascular Therapy of 43 Aneurysms

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Hannes Ruhnke
,
Thomas J. Kröncke
Further Information

Publication History

25 October 2016

08 March 2017

Publication Date:
16 May 2017 (online)

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the results of interventional endovascular therapy of incidental and symptomatic visceral artery aneurysms in the elective and emergency situation.

Materials and Methods 43 aneurysms in 38 patients (19 female, 19 male, mean age: 57 ± 16 years [18 – 82]) were treated between 2011 and 2015. The characteristics of the aneurysms (true vs. false aneurysm, size, etiology, location, symptoms) were considered. Furthermore, we evaluated the intervention with respect to technical success, embolic/occlusive agents used, therapy-associated complications and post-interventional follow-up. 

Results 23 true aneurysms (maximum diameter: 22 ± 18 mm [11 – 67 mm]) and 20 false aneurysms (maximum diameter: 9 ± 33 mm [3 – 150 mm]) were evaluated. The splenic (n = 14) and renal arteries (n = 18) were most frequently affected. The etiology was most commonly degenerative-atherosclerotic (47 %) or iatrogenic post-operative (19 %). 18/48 interventions were performed due to active bleeding. False aneurysms were associated significantly more often with active bleeding (63 vs. 25 %, p = 0.012). 41/48 treatments were technically successful. Re-intervention was necessary 6 times. In 2 cases the endovascular approach did not succeed. There was a complication rate of 10 %, whereby only 4 minor and 1 major complications occurred. No patient suffered from permanent sequelae. Aneurysms were primarily treated by using coils and if necessary additional embolic agents (liquid embolic agent or vascular plugs) (75 %). In the follow-up period, reperfusion of treated aneurysms occurred at a rate of 7 % (n = 3).

Conclusion Interventional endovascular therapy of visceral artery aneurysms is safe and effective in the elective treatment of incidental aneurysms as well as in significantly more frequent hemorrhaging false aneurysms in the emergency situation.

Key points

  • Interventional endovascular therapy of visceral artery aneurysms is safe and effective.

  • In more than 60 % of cases visceral artery pseudoaneurysms are associated significantly more often with a history of bleeding or acute bleeding. Hence, there is a need for (interventional) therapy even in small pseudoaneurysms.

  • Follow-up seems to be useful to detect reperfusion as manifestation of treatment failure.

Citation Format

  • Ruhnke H, Kröncke TJ, . Visceral Artery Aneurysms and Pseudoaneurysms: Retrospective Analysis of Interventional Endovascular Therapy of 43 Aneurysms. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2017; 189: 632 – 639

 
  • References

  • 1 Panayiotopoulos YP. Assadourian R. Taylor PR. Aneurysms of the visceral and renal arteries. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1996; 78: 412-419
  • 2 Nosher JL. Chung J. Brevetti LS. et al. Visceral and renal artery aneurysms: a pictorial essay on endovascular therapy. Radiographics 2006; 26: 1687-1704 ; quiz 1687
  • 3 Omary RA. Bettmann MA. Cardella JF. et al. Quality improvement guidelines for the reporting and archiving of interventional radiology procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: S293-S295
  • 4 Pitton MB. Dappa E. Jungmann F. et al. Visceral artery aneurysms: Incidence, management, and outcome analysis in a tertiary care center over one decade. Eur Radiol 2015; 25: 2004-2014
  • 5 Tessier DJ. Fowl RJ. Stone WM. et al. Iatrogenic hepatic artery pseudoaneurysms: an uncommon complication after hepatic, biliary, and pancreatic procedures. Ann Vasc Surg 2003; 17: 663-669
  • 6 Belli AM. Markose G. Morgan R. The role of interventional radiology in the management of abdominal visceral artery aneurysms. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012; 35: 234-243
  • 7 Cordova AC. Sumpio BE. Visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms – should they all be managed by endovascular techniques?. Ann Vasc Dis 2013; 6: 687-693
  • 8 Carroccio A. Jacobs TS. Faries P. et al. Endovascular treatment of visceral artery aneurysms. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2007; 41: 373-382
  • 9 Tarhan NC. Coskun M. Kayahan EM. et al. Regression of abdominal visceral aneurysms in polyarteritis nodosa: CT findings. Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 1617-1619
  • 10 Hemp JH. Sabri SS. Endovascular management of visceral arterial aneurysms. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 18: 14-23
  • 11 Kasirajan K. Greenberg RK. Clair D. et al. Endovascular management of visceral artery aneurysm. J Endovasc Ther 2001; 8: 150-155
  • 12 Tulsyan N. Kashyap VS. Greenberg RK. et al. The endovascular management of visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2007; 45: 276-283 ; discussion 283
  • 13 Cochennec F. Riga CV. Allaire E. et al. Contemporary management of splanchnic and renal artery aneurysms: results of endovascular compared with open surgery from two European vascular centers. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 42: 340-346
  • 14 Fankhauser GT. Stone WM. Naidu SG. et al. The minimally invasive management of visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2011; 53: 966-970
  • 15 Chiesa R. Astore D. Guzzo G. et al. Visceral artery aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 2005; 19: 42-48
  • 16 Pulli R. Dorigo W. Troisi N. et al. Surgical treatment of visceral artery aneurysms: A 25-year experience. J Vasc Surg 2008; 48: 334-342
  • 17 Messina LM. Shanley CJ. Visceral artery aneurysms. Surg Clin North Am 1997; 77: 425-442
  • 18 Mattar SG. Lumsden AB. The management of splenic artery aneurysms: experience with 23 cases. Am J Surg 1995; 169: 580-584
  • 19 Wagner WH. Allins AD. Treiman RL. et al. Ruptured visceral artery aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 1997; 11: 342-347
  • 20 Gabelmann A. Gorich J. Merkle EM. Endovascular treatment of visceral artery aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther 2002; 9: 38-47
  • 21 Roberts KJ. McCulloch N. Forde C. et al. Emergency treatment of haemorrhaging coeliac or mesenteric artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms in the era of endovascular management. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 49: 382-389
  • 22 Etezadi V. Gandhi RT. Benenati JF. et al. Endovascular treatment of visceral and renal artery aneurysms. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22: 1246-1253
  • 23 Dorigo W. Pulli R. Azas L. et al. Early and Intermediate Results of Elective Endovascular Treatment of True Visceral Artery Aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 2016; 30: 211-218
  • 24 Marone EM. Mascia D. Kahlberg A. et al. Is open repair still the gold standard in visceral artery aneurysm management?. Ann Vasc Surg 2011; 25: 936-946
  • 25 Corey MR. Ergul EA. Cambria RP. et al. The natural history of splanchnic artery aneurysms and outcomes after operative intervention. J Vasc Surg 2016; 63: 949-957
  • 26 Martegani A. Aiani L. Borghi C. Clinical Application of Contrast Ultrasound in Vascular Deseases. In: Lencioni R. Hrsg Enhancing the Role of Ultrasound with Contrast Agents. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2006: 157-161
  • 27 Chiaradia M. Novelli L. Deux JF. et al. Ruptured visceral artery aneurysms. Diagn Interv Imaging 2015; 96: 797-806