CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2017; 05(10): E987-E995
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-117947
Original article
Eigentümer und Copyright ©Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017

A health economic evaluation of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for the diagnosis of pancreatic cysts

Claude Le Pen
1   Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France
Laurent Palazzo
2   Clinique du Trocadéro, Paris, France
Bertrand Napoléon
3   Ramsay Générale de Santé, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 22 February 2017

accepted after revision 04 July 2017

Publication Date:
09 October 2017 (online)


Background and study aims The low sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), especially for the diagnosis of serous cystadenomas (SCAs), can be associated with diagnostic uncertainty that can regularly lead to unnecessary surgical procedures. Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) used with EUS-FNA improves diagnostic accuracy, helping to reduce unnecessary surgery and patient follow-up. This study was conducted to evaluate the economic benefit of EUS-FNA + nCLE.

Patients and methods Probabilities used were derived from two studies representative of the two diagnostic strategies: a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed by EUS-FNA alone and a prospective study of patients diagnosed by EUS-FNA + nCLE. Costs were based on French healthcare system rates; both private and public sector rates were included. A decision tree structure model used these probabilities and costs for two hypothetical cohorts of 1000 patients.

Results EUS-FNA + nCLE resulted in a reduction of 23 % in the total rate of surgical intervention, which translated to a reduction in clinical costs of 13 % (public sector) and 14 % (private sector). Additionally, the reduced rate of surgery would save the lives of 4 in 1000 patients. A stochastic sensitivity analysis using 100 simulations showed that in all cases the number of interventions was less for EUS-FNA + nCLE than for EUS-FNA. There was also a reduction in the incidence of false negatives using EUS-FNA + nCLE.

Conclusions EUS-FNA + nCLE results in significant economic benefits by reducing the incidence of misdiagnosis through improved diagnostic accuracy.