Risk of recurrence after endoscopic resection of early colorectal cancer with positive margins
submitted 27 March 2017
accepted after revision 16 August 2017
07 November 2017 (eFirst)
Background and study aim Additional surgery is recommended if an endoscopically resected T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) specimen shows a positive resection margin. We aimed to investigate the significance of a positive resection margin in endoscopically resected T1 CRC.
Patients and methods We enrolled 265 patients with T1 CRC who underwent endoscopic resection between January 2001 and December 2016. The inclusion criteria were: 1) complete resection by endoscopy, and 2) pathology of a positive margin. Among the 265 patients, 213 underwent additional surgery and 52 did not. In the additional surgery group, various clinicopathological factors were evaluated with respect to the presence or absence of residual tumor. The follow-up results were assessed in the group that did not undergo additional surgery.
Results In the 213 patients who underwent additional surgery, residual tumor was detected in 13 patients (6.1 %), and none of the clinicopathological factors was significantly associated with the presence of residual tumor. Among the 52 patients who did not undergo additional surgery, recurrence was detected in 4 (7.7 %), and all 4 underwent salvage surgery. Among these four patients, three had no risk factors for lymph node metastasis and recurrence was at the previous resection site; pathology was high grade dysplasia, rpT3N0M0, and rpT1N0M0, respectively.
Conclusions A positive resection margin in endoscopically resected T1 CRC is related to a relatively low incidence of residual tumor (6.1 %). Although current guidelines recommend additional surgery for such cases, surveillance and timely salvage surgery could be another option in selected cases.
- 1 Okabe S, Shia J, Nash G. et al. Lymph node metastasis in T1 adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. J Gastrointest Surg 2004; 8: 1032-1039
- 2 Tominaga K, Nakanishi Y, Nimura S. et al. Predictive histopathologic factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with nonpedunculated submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 92-100
- 3 Sohn DK, Chang HJ, Park JW. et al. Histopathological risk factors for lymph node metastasis in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma of pedunculated or semipedunculated type. J Clin Pathol 2007; 60: 912-915
- 4 Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y. et al. Risk factors for an adverse outcome in early invasive colorectal carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 385-394
- 5 Tateishi Y, Nakanishi Y, Taniguchi H. et al. Pathological prognostic factors predicting lymph node metastasis in submucosal invasive (T1) colorectal carcinoma. Mod Pathol 2010; 23: 1068-1072
- 6 Egashira Y, Yoshida T, Hirata I. et al. Analysis of pathological risk factors for lymph node metastasis of submucosal invasive colon cancer. Mod Pathol 2004; 17: 503-511
- 7 Suh JH, Han KS, Kim BC. et al. Predictors for lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 590-595
- 8 Labianca R, Nordlinger B, Beretta GD. et al. Early colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2013; 24: vi64-72
- 9 Watanabe T, Itabashi M, Shimada Y. et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2014 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2015; 20: 207-239
- 10 National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Colon Cancer. Version I. 2017. Available from: www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/colon.pdf Accessed 2016 December 13
- 11 Kobayashi H, Higuchi T, Uetake H. et al. Resection with en bloc removal of regional lymph node after endoscopic resection for T1 colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19: 4161-4167
- 12 Butte JM, Tang P, Gonen M. et al. Rate of residual disease after complete endoscopic resection of malignant colonic polyp. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55: 122-127
- 13 The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: S3-43
- 14 Haggitt RC, Glotzbach RE, Soffer EE. et al. Prognostic factors in colorectal carcinomas arising in adenomas: implications for lesions removed by endoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology 1985; 89: 328-336
- 15 Hackelsberger A, Fruhmorgen P, Weiler H. et al. Endoscopic polypectomy and management of colorectal adenomas with invasive carcinoma. Endoscopy 1995; 27: 153-158
- 16 Kawamura YJ, Sugamata Y, Yoshino K. et al. Endoscopic resection for submucosally invasive colorectal cancer: is it feasible?. Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 224-227
- 17 Watanabe T, Itabashi M, Shimada Y. et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) Guidelines 2014 for treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2015; 20: 207-239
- 18 Sakamoto T, Matsuda T, Otake Y. et al. Predictive factors of local recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol 2012; 47: 635-640
- 19 Oka S, Tanaka S, Saito Y. et al. Local recurrence after endoscopic resection for large colorectal neoplasia: a multicenter prospective study in Japan. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 697-707
- 20 Panis Y, Maggiori L, Caranhac G. et al. Mortality after colorectal cancer surgery: a French survey of more than 84,000 patients. Ann Surg 2011; 254: 738-743
- 21 Alves A, Panis Y, Mathieu P. et al. Postoperative mortality and morbidity in French patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results of a prospective multicenter study. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 278-283
- 22 Macias-Garcia F, Celeiro-Munoz C, Lesquereux-Martinez L. et al. A clinical model for predicting lymph node metastasis in submucosal invasive (T1) colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2015; 30: 761-768
- 23 Meining A, von Delius S, Eames TM. et al. Risk factors for unfavorable outcomes after endoscopic removal of submucosal invasive colorectal tumors. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 9: 590-594
- 24 Benizri EI, Bereder JM, Rahili A. et al. Additional colectomy after colonoscopic polypectomy for T1 colon cancer: a fine balance between oncologic benefit and operative risk. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012; 27: 1473-1478
- 25 Cooper GS, Xu F, Barnholtz Sloan JS. et al. Management of malignant colonic polyps: a population-based analysis of colonoscopic polypectomy versus surgery. Cancer 2012; 118: 651-659