Outcome in Childhood Stroke: Comparing Functional Outcome by Modified Rankin Scale with Neurological Outcome by Pediatric Stroke Outcome Measure

Abstract

Different scales are used as outcome predictors following arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) in children. Pediatric stroke outcome measure (PSOM) gives information about neurological deficits and function and modified Rankin scale (mRS) about functional outcome. Research examining the relationship between the two measures is scarce. The aim of this study is to correlate the two different scales and to get some information on the long course of outcomes according to these outcome measures. Sixty-one children with the diagnosis of AIS and normal neurodevelopment prior to stroke were investigated. Results of outcome measures (PSOM and mRS) from ≥ 2 years of follow-up were analyzed. Changes of neurological deficits (subcategories of PSOM) over time (discharge, 6 months, and ≥2 years) and prognostic impact on the outcome of the Pediatric National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and etiology/risk factors are presented.

Cramer's V with a coefficient of 0.836 (df-1) indicates a strong association between dichotomized total PSOM and mRS scores. The correlation between the total scales was strong (rho = 0.983, p < 0.001). The correlation coefficient was highest for sensorimotor (rho = 0.949, p < 0.001), then for language (rho = 0.464, p < 0.001) and cognitive (rho = 0.363, p = 0.004) subscales. PSOM scores improved at 6 months compared to the discharge state in sensorimotor (p<0.001) and language (p<0.026) domains, however, there was no statistically significant difference between PSOM scores at 6 months and >2 years follow-up. There was no improvement in cognitive PSOM scores during the follow-up period.

There was a high concordance level between the two scales, illustrating that long-term neurological deficits after stroke are related to poor functional outcome. Significant improvement of sensorimotor and language function happened within the period from onset to 6 months of follow-up. Thus, early mobilization of appropriate rehabilitative therapy might improve the outcome. We conclude that both outcome classifications are applicable for assessing outcome after childhood AIS.

Keywords

outcome - pediatric stroke - functional outcome - PSOM - mRS

Ethical Statement

The research proposal has been reviewed and approved by M. Iashvili Children's Central Hospital and D. Tvildiani Medical University's Ethical Committee. Informed consent was obtained from each patient/patient's parents/guardian.

Publication History

Received: 28 September 2022

Accepted: 30 December 2022

Article published online:
10 February 2023

• References

• 1 deVeber GA, Kirton A, Booth FA. et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of arterial ischemic stroke in children: the Canadian Pediatric Ischemic Stroke Registry. Pediatr Neurol 2017; 69: 58-70
• 2 Galvin J, Hewish S, Rice J, Mackay MT. Functional outcome following paediatric stroke. Dev Neurorehabil 2011; 14 (02) 67-71
• 3 Bulder MMM, Hellmann PM, van Nieuwenhuizen O, Kappelle LJ, Klijn CJM, Braun KPJ. Measuring outcome after arterial ischemic stroke in childhood with two different instruments. Cerebrovasc Dis 2011; 32 (05) 463-470
• 4 World Health Organization. “International classification of functioning, disability and health: children and youth version: ICF-CY,”. 2007 , 322
• 5 Kirton A, deVeber G. Paediatric stroke: pressing issues and promising directions. Lancet Neurol 2015; 14 (01) 92-102
• 6 Malone LA, Felling RJ. Pediatric stroke: unique implications of the immature brain on injury and recovery. Pediatr Neurol 2020; 102: 3-9
• 7 Slim M, Fox CK, Friefeld S. et al; SIPS Investigators. Validation of the pediatric stroke outcome measure for classifying overall neurological deficit. Pediatr Res 2020; 88 (02) 234-242
• 8 Aarsen FK, Paquier PF, Reddingius RE. et al. Functional outcome after low-grade astrocytoma treatment in childhood. Cancer 2006; 106 (02) 396-402
• 9 Cnossen MH, Aarsen FK, Akker SLj. et al. Paediatric arterial ischaemic stroke: functional outcome and risk factors. Dev Med Child Neurol 2010; 52 (04) 394-399
• 10 Felling RJ, Rafay MF, Bernard TJ. et al; International Pediatric Stroke Study Group. Predicting recovery and outcome after pediatric stroke: results from the International Pediatric Stroke Study. Ann Neurol 2020; 87 (06) 840-852
• 11 Kirton A, Westmacott R, deVeber G. Pediatric stroke: rehabilitation of focal injury in the developing brain. NeuroRehabilitation 2007; 22 (05) 371-382
• 12 Anderson PJ, De Luca CR, Hutchinson E, Roberts G, Doyle LW. Victorian Infant Collaborative Group. Underestimation of developmental delay by the new Bayley-III scale. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010; 164 (04) 352-356
• 13 Greenham M, Gordon A, Anderson V, Mackay MT. Outcome in childhood stroke. Stroke 2016; 47 (04) 1159-1164
• 14 Westmacott R, MacGregor D, Askalan R, deVeber G. Late emergence of cognitive deficits after unilateral neonatal stroke. Stroke 2009; 40 (06) 2012-2019
• 15 Kitchen L, Westmacott R, Friefeld S. et al. The pediatric stroke outcome measure: a validation and reliability study. Stroke 2012; 43 (06) 1602-1608
• 16 Delsing BJP, Catsman-Berrevoets CE, Appel IM. Early prognostic indicators of outcome in ischemic childhood stroke. Pediatr Neurol 2001; 24 (04) 283-289
• 17 Ottenbacher KJ, Msall ME, Lyon N. et al. The WeeFIM instrument: its utility in detecting change in children with developmental disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81 (10) 1317-1326
• 18 Fiser DH. Assessing the outcome of pediatric intensive care. J Pediatr 1992; 121 (01) 68-74
• 19 Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II. Prognosis. Scott Med J 1957; 2 (05) 200-215
• 20 Bigi S, Fischer U, Wehrli E. et al. Acute ischemic stroke in children versus young adults. Ann Neurol 2011; 70 (02) 245-254
• 21 Goeggel Simonetti B, Cavelti A, Arnold M. et al. Long-term outcome after arterial ischemic stroke in children and young adults. Neurology 2015; 84 (19) 1941-1947
• 22 Banks JL, Marotta CA. Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke 2007; 38 (03) 1091-1096
• 23 Sporns PB, Kemmling A, Lee S. et al. A prospective multicenter registry on feasibility, safety, and outcome of endovascular recanalization in childhood stroke (Save ChildS Pro). Front Neurol 2021; 12: 736092
• 24 Steinlin M, Pfister I, Pavlovic J. et al; Swiss Societies of Paediatric Neurology and Neonatology. The first three years of the Swiss Neuropaediatric Stroke Registry (SNPSR): a population-based study of incidence, symptoms and risk factors. Neuropediatrics 2005; 36 (02) 90-97
• 25 Steinlin M, Roellin K, Schroth G. Long-term follow-up after stroke in childhood. Eur J Pediatr 2004; 163 (4-5): 245-250
• 26 Vázquez López M, de Castro de Castro P, Barredo Valderrama E. et al. Outcome of arterial ischemic stroke in children with heart disease. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2017; 21 (05) 730-737
• 27 Cooper AN, Anderson V, Hearps S. et al. The pediatric stroke outcome measure: a predictor of outcome following arterial ischemic stroke. Neurology 2018; 90 (05) e365-e372
• 28 Lo W, Gordon AL, Hajek C. et al. Pediatric stroke outcome measure: predictor of multiple impairments in childhood stroke. J Child Neurol 2014; 29 (11) 1524-1530
• 29 Neuner B, von Mackensen S, Krümpel A. et al. Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with stroke, self-reports, and parent/proxies reports: cross-sectional investigation. Ann Neurol 2011; 70 (01) 70-78
• 30 Ichord RN, Bastian R, Abraham L. et al. Interrater reliability of the Pediatric National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (PedNIHSS) in a multicenter study. Stroke 2011; 42 (03) 613-617
• 31 Bernard TJ, Beslow LA, Manco-Johnson MJ. et al. Inter-rater reliability of the CASCADE criteria: challenges in classifying arteriopathies. Stroke 2016; 47 (10) 2443-2449
• 32 Bernard TJ, Manco-Johnson MJ, Lo W. et al. Towards a consensus-based classification of childhood arterial ischemic stroke. Stroke 2012; 43 (02) 371-377
• 33 Aprasidze T, Tatishvili N, Shatirishvili T, Lomidze G. Predictors of neurological outcome of arterial ischemic stroke in children. J Pediatr Neurol 2021; 19 (03) 161-165
• 34 Gordon AL, Ganesan V, Towell A, Kirkham FJ. Functional outcome following stroke in children. J Child Neurol 2002; 17 (06) 429-434
• 35 Elbers J, deVeber G, Pontigon A-M, Moharir M. Long-term outcomes of pediatric ischemic stroke in adulthood. J Child Neurol 2014; 29 (06) 782-788
• 36 Chung MG, Guilliams KP, Wilson JL. et al; International Pediatric Stroke Study Investigators. Arterial ischemic stroke secondary to cardiac disease in neonates and children. Pediatr Neurol 2019; 100: 35-41
• 37 Rafay MF, Shapiro KA, Surmava A-M. et al; International Pediatric Stroke Study (IPSS) Group. Spectrum of cerebral arteriopathies in children with arterial ischemic stroke. Neurology 2020; 94 (23) e2479-e2490
• 38 Cooper AN, Anderson V, Hearps S. et al. Trajectories of motor recovery in the first year after pediatric arterial ischemic stroke. Pediatrics 2017; 140 (02) e20163870
• 39 Westmacott R, Askalan R, MacGregor D, Anderson P, Deveber G. Cognitive outcome following unilateral arterial ischaemic stroke in childhood: effects of age at stroke and lesion location. Dev Med Child Neurol 2010; 52 (04) 386-393
• 40 Abgottspon S, Thaqi Q, Steiner L. et al. Effect of age at pediatric stroke on long-term cognitive outcome. Neurology 2022; 98 (07) e721-e729