PDF herunterladen
Semin Hear 2023; 44(S 01): S64-S74
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1764133
Review Article

Extending the High-Frequency Bandwidth and Predicting Speech-in-Noise Recognition: Building on the Work of Pat Stelmachowicz

Brian B. Monson
1   Department of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois
2   Department of Biomedical and Translational Sciences, Carle Illinois College of Medicine, Urbana, Illinois
3   Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois
,
Allison Trine
1   Department of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Recent work has demonstrated that high-frequency (>6 kHz) and extended high-frequency (EHF; >8 kHz) hearing is valuable for speech-in-noise recognition. Several studies also indicate that EHF pure-tone thresholds predict speech-in-noise performance. These findings contradict the broadly accepted “speech bandwidth” that has historically been limited to below 8 kHz. This growing body of work is a tribute to the work of Pat Stelmachowicz, whose research was instrumental in revealing the limitations of the prior speech bandwidth work, particularly for female talkers and child listeners. Here, we provide a historical review that demonstrates how the work of Stelmachowicz and her colleagues paved the way for subsequent research to measure effects of extended bandwidths and EHF hearing. We also present a reanalysis of previous data collected in our lab, the results of which suggest that 16-kHz pure-tone thresholds are consistent predictors of speech-in-noise performance, regardless of whether EHF cues are present in the speech signal. Based on the work of Stelmachowicz, her colleagues, and those who have come afterward, we argue that it is time to retire the notion of a limited speech bandwidth for speech perception for both children and adults.

Keywords

extended high frequency - speech perception - speech in noise


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
01. März 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Monson BB, Lotto AJ, Story BH. Detection of high-frequency energy level changes in speech and singing. J Acoust Soc Am 2014; 135 (01) 400-406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 French NR, Steinberg JC. Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 1947; 19 (01) 90-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ching TYC, Dillon H, Byrne D. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 103 (02) 1128-1140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index - ANSI S3.5:1997: R2007. Acoustical Society of America; 2017
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bell TS, Dirks DD, Trine TD. Frequency-importance functions for words in high- and low-context sentences. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35 (04) 950-959
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Dubno JR, Dirks DD, Schaefer AB. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85 (01) 355-364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Fausti SA, Frey RH, Erickson DA, Rappaport BZ, Cleary EJ, Brummett RE. A system for evaluating auditory function from 8000–20 000  Hz. J Acoust Soc Am 1979; 66 (06) 1713-1718
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Northern JL, Downs MP, Rudmose W, Glorig A, Fletcher JL. Recommended high‐frequency audiometric threshold levels (8000–18 000  Hz). J Acoust Soc Am 1972; 51 ( 1A): 142-142
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Stelmachowicz PG, Beauchaine KA, Kalberer A, Jesteadt W. Normative thresholds in the 8- to 20-kHz range as a function of age. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 86 (04) 1384-1391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Stelmachowicz PG, Gorga MP, Cullen JK. A calibration procedure for the assessment of thresholds above 8000  Hz. J Speech Hear Res 1982; 25 (04) 618-623
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Stevens KN, Berkovitz R, Kidd Jr G, Green DM. Calibration of ear canals for audiometry at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 81 (02) 470-484
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Stelmachowicz PG, Beauchaine KA, Kalberer A, Kelly WJ, Jesteadt W. High-frequency audiometry: test reliability and procedural considerations. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85 (02) 879-887
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Green DM, Kidd Jr G, Stevens KN. High-frequency audiometric assessment of a young adult population. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 81 (02) 485-494
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hogan CA, Turner CW. High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104 (01) 432-441
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Murray N, Byrne D. Performance of hearing-impaired and normal hearing listeners with various high-frequency cut-offs in hearing aids. Aust J Audiol 1986; 8 (01) 21-28
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Turner CW, Cummings KJ. Speech audibility for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. Am J Audiol 1999; 8 (01) 47-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kortekaas RW, Stelmachowicz PG. Bandwidth effects on children's perception of the inflectional morpheme /s/: acoustical measurements, auditory detection, and clarity rating. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000; 43 (03) 645-660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Stelmachowicz PG, Pittman AL, Hoover BM, Lewis DE. Effect of stimulus bandwidth on the perception of /s/ in normal- and hearing-impaired children and adults. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110 (04) 2183-2190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Stelmachowicz PG, Pittman AL, Hoover BM, Lewis DE, Moeller MP. The importance of high-frequency audibility in the speech and language development of children with hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130 (05) 556-562
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Stelmachowicz PG, Lewis DE, Choi S, Hoover B. Effect of stimulus bandwidth on auditory skills in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. Ear Hear 2007; 28 (04) 483-494
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Pittman AL. Short-term word-learning rate in children with normal hearing and children with hearing loss in limited and extended high-frequency bandwidths. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008; 51 (03) 785-797
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 McCreery RW, Stelmachowicz PG. The effects of limited bandwidth and noise on verbal processing time and word recall in normal-hearing children. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (05) 585-591
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 McCreery RW, Stelmachowicz PG. Audibility-based predictions of speech recognition for children and adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2011; 130 (06) 4070-4081
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Moore BCJ, Füllgrabe C, Stone MA. Effect of spatial separation, extended bandwidth, and compression speed on intelligibility in a competing-speech task. J Acoust Soc Am 2010; 128 (01) 360-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Levy SC, Freed DJ, Nilsson M, Moore BCJ, Puria S. Extended high-frequency bandwidth improves speech reception in the presence of spatially separated masking speech. Ear Hear 2015; 36 (05) e214-e224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Monson BB, Lotto AJ, Ternström S. Detection of high-frequency energy changes in sustained vowels produced by singers. J Acoust Soc Am 2011; 129 (04) 2263-2268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Monson BB, Lotto AJ, Story BH. Gender and vocal production mode discrimination using the high frequencies for speech and singing. Front Psychol 2014; 5: 1239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Monson BB, Caravello J. The maximum audible low-pass cutoff frequency for speech. J Acoust Soc Am 2019; 146 (06) EL496-EL501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Füllgrabe C, Baer T, Stone MA, Moore BCJ. Preliminary evaluation of a method for fitting hearing aids with extended bandwidth. Int J Audiol 2010; 49 (10) 741-753
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Lippmann RP. Accurate consonant perception without mid-frequency speech energy. IEEE Trans Speech Audio Process 1996; 4 (01) 66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Monson BB, Hunter EJ, Lotto AJ, Story BH. The perceptual significance of high-frequency energy in the human voice. Front Psychol 2014; 5: 587
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Vitela AD, Monson BB, Lotto AJ. Phoneme categorization relying solely on high-frequency energy. J Acoust Soc Am 2015; 137 (01) EL65-EL70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Monson BB, Rock J, Schulz A, Hoffman E, Buss E. Ecological cocktail party listening reveals the utility of extended high-frequency hearing. Hear Res 2019; 381: 107773
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Monson BB, Hunter EJ, Story BH. Horizontal directivity of low- and high-frequency energy in speech and singing. J Acoust Soc Am 2012; 132 (01) 433-441
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Trine A, Monson BB. Extended high frequencies provide both spectral and temporal information to improve speech-in-speech recognition. Trends Hear 2020; 24: 2331216520980299
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Flaherty M, Libert K, Monson BB. Extended high-frequency hearing and head orientation cues benefit children during speech-in-speech recognition. Hear Res 2021; 406: 108230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Motlagh Zadeh L, Silbert NH, Sternasty K, Swanepoel W, Hunter LL, Moore DR. Extended high-frequency hearing enhances speech perception in noise. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019; 116 (47) 23753-23759
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Badri R, Siegel JH, Wright BA. Auditory filter shapes and high-frequency hearing in adults who have impaired speech in noise performance despite clinically normal audiograms. J Acoust Soc Am 2011; 129 (02) 852-863
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Yeend I, Beach EF, Sharma M. Working memory and extended high-frequency hearing in adults: diagnostic predictors of speech-in-noise perception. Ear Hear 2019; 40 (03) 458-467
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Braza MD, Corbin NE, Buss E, Monson BB. Effect of masker head orientation, listener age, and extended high-frequency sensitivity on speech perception in spatially separated speech. Ear Hear 2022; 43 (01) 90-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Mishra SK, Saxena U, Rodrigo H. Extended high-frequency hearing impairment despite a normal audiogram: relation to early aging, speech-in-noise perception, cochlear function, and routine earphone use. Ear Hear 2022; 43 (03) 822-835
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Liberman MC, Epstein MJ, Cleveland SS, Wang H, Maison SF. Toward a differential diagnosis of hidden hearing loss in humans. PLoS One 2016; 11 (09) e0162726
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Smith SB, Krizman J, Liu C, White-Schwoch T, Nicol T, Kraus N. Investigating peripheral sources of speech-in-noise variability in listeners with normal audiograms. Hear Res 2019; 371: 66-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Couth S, Prendergast G, Guest H. et al. Investigating the effects of noise exposure on self-report, behavioral and electrophysiological indices of hearing damage in musicians with normal audiometric thresholds. Hear Res 2020; 395: 108021
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Hunter LL, Monson BB, Moore DR. et al. Extended high frequency hearing and speech perception implications in adults and children. Hear Res 2020; 397: 107922
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Bench J, Kowal A, Bamford J. The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. Br J Audiol 1979; 13 (03) 108-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Streiner DL. Regression in the service of the superego: the do's and don'ts of stepwise multiple regression. Can J Psychiatry 1994; 39 (04) 191-196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Whittingham MJ, Stephens PA, Bradbury RB, Freckleton RP. Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour?. J Anim Ecol 2006; 75 (05) 1182-1189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 2013; 4 (02) 133-142
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Pienkowski M. On the etiology of listening difficulties in noise despite clinically normal audiograms. Ear Hear 2017; 38 (02) 135-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Mealings K, Yeend I, Valderrama JT. et al. Discovering the unmet needs of people with difficulties understanding speech in noise and a normal or near-normal audiogram. Am J Audiol 2020; 29 (03) 329-355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Pryce H, Wainwright D. Help-seeking for medically unexplained hearing difficulties: a qualitative study. Int J Ther Rehabil 2008; 15 (08) 343-349
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar