Download PDF
Semin Hear 2023; 44(S 01): S36-S48
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1764134
Review Article

Speech Understanding in Complex Environments by School-Age Children with Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss

Dawna E. Lewis
1   Center for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Numerous studies have shown that children with mild bilateral (MBHL) or unilateral hearing loss (UHL) experience speech perception difficulties in poor acoustics. Much of the research in this area has been conducted via laboratory studies using speech-recognition tasks with a single talker and presentation via earphones and/or from a loudspeaker located directly in front of the listener. Real-world speech understanding is more complex, however, and these children may need to exert greater effort than their peers with normal hearing to understand speech, potentially impacting progress in a number of developmental areas. This article discusses issues and research relative to speech understanding in complex environments for children with MBHL or UHL and implications for real-world listening and understanding.

Keywords

mild bilateral hearing loss - unilateral hearing loss - children - speech perception

Disclosures

D.E.L. is a member of the Phonak Pediatric Advisory Board. The membership has no conflicts with the content of this article.




Publication History

Article published online:
02 March 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Carlile S. Active listening: speech intelligibility in noisy environments. Acoust Aust 2014; 42: 90-96
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Dockrell J, Shield B. Acoustical barriers in classrooms: the impact of noise on performance in the classroom. Br Educ Res J 2006; 32: 509-525
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Klatte M, Bergström K, Lachmann T. Does noise affect learning? A short review on noise effects on cognitive performance in children. Front Psychol 2013; 4: 578
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lin G, Carlile S. Costs of switching auditory spatial attention in following conversational turn-taking. Front Neurosci 2015; 9: 124
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Lyberg-Åhlander V, Brännström KJ, Sahlén BS. On the interaction of speakers' voice quality, ambient noise and task complexity with children's listening comprehension and cognition. Front Psychol 2015; 6: 871
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Erber N. Auditory Training. Washington, DC: AG Bell Publications; 1982
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Kiessling J, Pichora-Fuller MK, Gatehouse S. et al. Candidature for and delivery of audiological services: special needs of older people. Int J Audiol 2003; 42 (Suppl. 02) S92-S101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ching TYC, Dillon H, Leigh G, Cupples L. Learning from the longitudinal outcomes of children with hearing impairment (LOCHI) study: summary of 5-year findings and implications. Int J Audiol 2018; 57 (Suppl. 02) S105-S111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 McCreery RW, Walker EA, Spratford M. et al. Speech recognition and parent ratings from auditory development questionnaires in children who are hard of hearing. Ear Hear 2015; 36 Suppl 1 (0 1): 60S-75S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 McCreery RW, Walker EA, Spratford M, Lewis D, Brennan M. Auditory, cognitive, and linguistic factors predict speech recognition in adverse listening conditions for children with hearing loss. Front Neurosci 2019; 13: 1093
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Sininger YS, Grimes A, Christensen E. Auditory development in early amplified children: factors influencing auditory-based communication outcomes in children with hearing loss. Ear Hear 2010; 31 (02) 166-185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Tomblin JB, Oleson J, Ambrose SE, Walker EA, McCreery RW, Moeller MP. Aided hearing moderates the academic outcomes of children with mild to severe hearing loss. Ear Hear 2020; 41 (04) 775-789
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Walker EA, Sapp C, Oleson JJ, McCreery RW. Longitudinal speech recognition in noise in children: effects of hearing status and vocabulary. Front Psychol 2019; 10: 2421
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Walker EA, Sapp C, Dallapiazza M, Spratford M, McCreery RW, Oleson JJ. Language and reading outcomes in fourth-grade children with mild hearing loss compared to age-matched hearing peers. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2020; 51 (01) 17-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Wiggin M, Chung W. Early hearing detection and vocabulary of children with hearing loss. Pediatrics 2017; 140 (02) 1-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Niskar AS, Kieszak SM, Holmes A, Esteban E, Rubin C, Brody DJ. Prevalence of hearing loss among children 6 to 19 years of age: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA 1998; 279 (14) 1071-1075
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Bess FH, Dodd-Murphy J, Parker RA. Children with minimal sensorineural hearing loss: prevalence, educational performance, and functional status. Ear Hear 1998; 19 (05) 339-354
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Fast Facts. Back-to-School Statistics. National Center for Educational Statistics. Accessed January 24, 2022 at: https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=372#K12-enrollment
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 National Workshop on Mild and Unilateral Hearing Loss: Workshop Proceedings. Breckenridge, CO.: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2005: 1-17
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Bess FH, Tharpe AM, Gibler AM. Auditory performance of children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear 1986; 7 (01) 20-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Crandell CC. Speech recognition in noise by children with minimal degrees of sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear 1993; 14 (03) 210-216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kenworthy OT, Klee T, Tharpe AM. Speech recognition ability of children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss as a function of amplification, speech stimuli and listening condition. Ear Hear 1990; 11 (04) 264-270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Johnson CE, Stein R, Broadway A, Markwalter T. “Minimal” high-frequency hearing loss and school-age children: speech recognition in a classroom. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 1997; 28: 77-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Moore DR, Zobay O, Ferguson MA. Minimal and mild hearing loss in children: Association with auditory perception, cognition, and communication. Ear Hear 2020; 41 (04) 720-732
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ruscetta MN, Arjmand EM, Pratt SR. Speech recognition abilities in noise for children with severe-to-profound unilateral hearing impairment. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2005; 69 (06) 771-779
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bess FH, Tharpe AM. Case history data on unilaterally hearing-impaired children. Ear Hear 1986; 7 (01) 14-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Culbertson JL, Gilbert LE. Children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss: cognitive, academic, and social development. Ear Hear 1986; 7 (01) 38-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Davis JM, Elfenbein J, Schum R, Bentler RA. Effects of mild and moderate hearing impairments on language, educational, and psychosocial behavior of children. J Speech Hear Disord 1986; 51 (01) 53-62
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kiese-Himmel C, Ohlwein S. Characteristics of children with permanent mild hearing impairment. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2003; 55 (02) 70-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Lieu JEC, Tye-Murray N, Fu Q. Longitudinal study of children with unilateral hearing loss. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (09) 2088-2095
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Lieu JEC. Unilateral hearing loss in children: speech-language and school performance. B-ENT 2013; (Suppl. 21) 107-115
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Oyler R, Oyler A, Matkin N. Unilateral hearing loss: demographics and educational impact. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 1988; 19: 201-210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Wake M, Poulakis Z. Slight and mild hearing loss in primary school children. J Paediatr Child Health 2004; 40 (1-2): 11-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Porter H, Sladen DP, Ampah SB, Rothpletz A, Bess FH. Developmental outcomes in early school-age children with minimal hearing loss. Am J Audiol 2013; 22 (02) 263-270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Stecker GC, Gallun G. Binaural hearing, sound localization, and spatial hearing. In: Tremblay K, Burkhardt R. eds. Translational Perspectives in Auditory Neuroscience: Normal Aspects of Hearing. San Diego: Plural Publishing, Inc.; 2012: 383-433
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Colburn HS, Shinn-Cunningham B, Kidd Jr G, Durlach N. The perceptual consequences of binaural hearing. Int J Audiol 2006; 45 (Suppl. 01) S34-S44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Humes LE, Allen SK, Bess FH. Horizontal sound localization skills of unilaterally hearing-impaired children. Audiology 1980; 19 (06) 508-518
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Newton VE. Sound localisation in children with a severe unilateral hearing loss. Audiology 1983; 22 (02) 189-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Corbin NE, Buss E, Leibold LJ. Spatial hearing skills and functional auditory skills in children with unilateral hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2021; 64 (11) 4495-4512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Walker EA, Spratford M, Moeller MP. et al. Predictors of hearing aid use time in children with mild-to-severe hearing loss. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2013; 44 (01) 73-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Walker EA, Holte L, McCreery RW, Spratford M, Page T, Moeller MP. The influence of hearing aid use on outcomes of children with mild hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2015; 58 (05) 1611-1625
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Lewis DE, Valente DL, Spalding JL. Effect of minimal/mild hearing loss on children's speech understanding in a simulated classroom. Ear Hear 2015; 36 (01) 136-144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Kahnemann D. Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1973
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Gosselin PA, Gagné J-P. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2011; 54 (03) 944-958
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 McGarrigle R, Munro KJ, Dawes P. et al. Listening effort and fatigue: what exactly are we measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group ‘white paper’. Int J Audiol 2014; 53 (07) 433-440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Brennan MA, Lewis D, McCreery R, Kopun J, Alexander JM. Listening effort and speech recognition with frequency compression amplification for children and adults with hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol 2017; 28 (09) 823-837
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Choi S, Lotto A, Lewis D, Hoover B, Stelmachowicz P. Attentional modulation of word recognition by children in a dual-task paradigm. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008; 51 (04) 1042-1054
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Gustafson S, McCreery R, Hoover B, Kopun JG, Stelmachowicz P. Listening effort and perceived clarity for normal-hearing children with the use of digital noise reduction. Ear Hear 2014; 35 (02) 183-194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Hick CB, Tharpe AM. Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002; 45 (03) 573-584
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Howard CS, Munro KJ, Plack CJ. Listening effort at signal-to-noise ratios that are typical of the school classroom. Int J Audiol 2010; 49 (12) 928-932
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Lewis D, Schmid K, O'Leary S, Spalding J, Heinrichs-Graham E, High R. Effects of noise on speech recognition and listening effort in children with normal-hearing and children with mild bilateral or unilateral hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2016; 59 (05) 1218-1232
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 McCreery RW, Stelmachowicz PG. The effects of limited bandwidth and noise on verbal processing time and word recall in normal-hearing children. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (05) 585-591
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 McFadden B, Pittman A. Effect of minimal hearing loss on children's ability to multitask in quiet and in noise. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2008; 39 (03) 342-351
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 McGarrigle R, Gustafson SJ, Hornsby BWY, Bess FH. Behavioral measures of listening effort in school-age children: Examining the effects of signal-to-noise ratio, hearing loss, and amplification. Ear Hear 2019; 40 (02) 381-392
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Oosthuizen I, Picou EM, Pottas L, Myburgh HC, Swanepoel W. Listening effort in school-age children with normal hearing compared to children with limited useable hearing unilaterally. Am J Audiol 2021; 30 (02) 309-324
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Prodi N, Visentin C, Peretti A, Griguolo J, Bartolucci GB. Investigating listening effort in classrooms for 5- to 7-year-old children. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2019; 50 (02) 196-210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Stelmachowicz PG, Lewis DE, Choi S, Hoover B. Effect of stimulus bandwidth on auditory skills in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. Ear Hear 2007; 28 (04) 483-494
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Griffin AM, Poissant SF, Freyman RL. Auditory comprehension in school-aged children with normal hearing and with unilateral hearing loss. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2020; 51 (01) 29-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Elliott LL. Performance of children aged 9 to 17 years on a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence material with controlled word predictability. J Acoust Soc Am 1979; 66 (03) 651-653
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Fallon M, Trehub SE, Schneider BA. Children's use of semantic cues in degraded listening environments. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 111 (5, Pt 1): 2242-2249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Johnson CE. Children's phoneme identification in reverberation and noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000; 43 (01) 144-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Bradley JS, Sato H. The intelligibility of speech in elementary school classrooms. J Acoust Soc Am 2008; 123 (04) 2078-2086
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 McKellin W, Shahin K, Hodgson M. et al. Noisy zones of proximal development: conversations in noisy classrooms. J Sociolinguist 2011; 15: 65-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Ronsse LM, Wang LM. Relationships between unoccupied classroom acoustical conditions and elementary student achievement measured in eastern Nebraska. J Acoust Soc Am 2013; 133 (03) 1480-1495
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Spratford M, Walker EA, McCreery RW. Use of an application to verify classroom acoustic recommendations for children who are hard of hearing in a general education setting. Am J Audiol 2019; 28 (04) 927-934
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Crukley J, Scollie S, Parsa V. An exploration of non-quiet listening at school. J Educ Audiol 2011; 17: 23-35
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Klatte M, Lachmann T, Meis M. Effects of noise and reverberation on speech perception and listening comprehension of children and adults in a classroom-like setting. Noise Health 2010; 12 (49) 270-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Leibold LJ, Buss E. Children's identification of consonants in a speech-shaped noise or a two-talker masker. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2013; 56 (04) 1144-1155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Brungart DS, Kordik AJ, Simpson BD. Audio and visual cues in a two-talker divided attention speech-monitoring task. Hum Factors 2005; 47 (03) 562-573
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Ricketts TA, Galster J. Head angle and elevation in classroom environments: implications for amplification. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008; 51 (02) 516-525
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Senkowski D, Saint-Amour D, Gruber T, Foxe JJ. Look who's talking: the deployment of visuo-spatial attention during multisensory speech processing under noisy environmental conditions. Neuroimage 2008; 43 (02) 379-387
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Grant KW, Seitz P-F. The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 108 (3, Pt 1): 1197-1208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Arnold P, Hill F. Bisensory augmentation: a speech reading advantage when speech is clearly audible and intact. Br J Psychol 2001; 92: 339-353
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Helfer KS, Freyman RL. The role of visual speech cues in reducing energetic and informational masking. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 117 (02) 842-849
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Lalonde K, McCreery RW. Audiovisual enhancement of speech perception in noise by school-age children who are hard of hearing. Ear Hear 2020; 41 (04) 705-719
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Munhall KG, Jones JA, Callan DE, Kuratate T, Vatikiotis-Bateson E. Visual prosody and speech intelligibility: head movement improves auditory speech perception. Psychol Sci 2004; 15 (02) 133-137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Thomas SM, Jordan TR. Contributions of oral and extraoral facial movement to visual and audiovisual speech perception. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2004; 30 (05) 873-888
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Alsius A, Navarra J, Campbell R, Soto-Faraco S. Audiovisual integration of speech falters under high attention demands. Curr Biol 2005; 15 (09) 839-843
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Mishra S, Lunner T, Stenfelt S, Rönnberg J, Rudner M. Visual information can hinder working memory processing of speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2013; 56 (04) 1120-1132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Al-Salim S, Moeller MP, McGregor KK. Performance of children with hearing loss on an audiovisual version of a nonword repetition task. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2020; 51 (01) 42-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Sandgren O, Hansson K, Sahlén B. Working memory and referential communication-multimodal aspects of interaction between children with sensorineural hearing impairment and normal hearing peers. Front Psychol 2015; 6: 242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Valente DL, Plevinsky HM, Franco JM, Heinrichs-Graham EC, Lewis DE. Experimental investigation of the effects of the acoustical conditions in a simulated classroom on speech recognition and learning in children. J Acoust Soc Am 2012; 131 (01) 232-246
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Lewis DE, Wannagot S. Effects of looking behavior on listening and understanding in a simulated classroom. J Educ Audiol 2014; 20: 24-33
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Lewis DE, Manninen CM, Valente DL, Smith NA. Children's understanding of instructions presented in noise and reverberation. Am J Audiol 2014; 23 (03) 326-336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Lewis DE, Smith NA, Spalding JL, Valente DL. Looking behavior and audiovisual speech understanding in children with normal hearing and children with mild bilateral or unilateral hearing Loss. Ear Hear 2018; 39 (04) 783-794
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Gheller F, Spicciarelli G, Gomez-Merino N, Trevisi P. Pupillometry in children: a good method for assessing listening effort. It J Audiol Phoniatrics 2020; ;(Dec): 3-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Rudner M, Lyberg-Åhlander V, Brännström J, Nirme J, Pichora-Fuller MK, Sahlén B. Listening comprehension and listening effort in the primary school classroom. Front Psychol 2018; 9: 1193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar